Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Increased rate of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after deep enucleation of small pancreatic tumors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Only small, potentially benign pancreatic tumors located ≥3 mm distant from the main pancreatic duct (MPD) are considered good candidates for enucleation. This study evaluates the outcome of enucleations with regard to their distance to the MPD.

Methods

Clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes of prospectively documented patients with small (≤30 mm), potentially benign pancreatic tumors, who underwent enucleation, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided in two groups, either deep enucleation (DE, distance ≤3 mm) or standard enucleation (SE, distance >3 mm), as determined by intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS).

Results

Sixty patients underwent DE (n = 30) or SE (n = 30) with IOUS. Both groups did not differ regarding age, tumor size, pathology, and operating time. Complications occurred in 24/30 (80 %) patients of the DE group compared to 15/30 (50 %) patients after SE (P = 0.029). Mortality was nil. The most frequent complication was pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurring in 22/30 (73.3 %) patients after DE and 9/30 (30 %) patients undergoing SE (P = 0.002). Especially, the rate of clinically significant POPF types B and C was higher after DE (21 of 30 patients) compared to SE (7 of 30 patients, P = 0.0006). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed DE as the only significant factor that negatively influenced the occurrence of POPF. Postoperative hospital stay tended to be longer after DE (15 vs. 11.5 days, P = 0.050). All but two patients with metastatic gastrinoma and two patients, who died of unrelated causes, showed no evidence of disease after a median follow-up of 24 (3–235) months.

Conclusions

Deep enucleation of small, potentially benign pancreatic tumors should be considered with caution given the high rate of clinically relevant POPF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Megibow AJ, Lombardo FP, Guarise A, Carbognin G, Scholes J, Rofsky NM, Macari M, Balthazar EJ, Procacci C (2001) Cystic masses: cross-sectional imaging observations and serial follow-up. Abdom Imaging 26:640–647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Plockinger U, Wiedemann B (2002) Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic system: the role of early diagnosis, genetic testing and preventive surgery. Dig Dis 20:49–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Falconi M, Mantovani W, Crippa S, Mascetta G, Salvia R, Pederzoli P (2008) Pancreatic insufficiency after different resections for benign tumours. Br J Surg 95:85–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahl S, Malferheiner P (2004) Exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency after pancreatic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18:947–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crippa S, Boninsegna L, Partelli S, Falconi M (2010) Parenchyma-sparing resections for pancreatic neoplasms. J Hepato-Biliary Pancreat Sci 17:782–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crippa S, Bassi M, Salvia R, Falconi M, Butturini G, Pederzoli P (2007) Enucleation of pancreatic neoplasms. Br J Surg 94:1254–1259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Casadei R, Ricci C, Rega D, D'Ambra M, Pezzilli R, Tomassetti P, Campana D, Nori F, Minni F (2010) Pancreatic endocrine tumors less than 4 cm in diameter: resect or enucleate? A single-center experience. Pancreas 39:825–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiely JM, Nakeeb A, Komorowski RA, Wilson SD, Pitt HA (2003) Cystic pancreatic neoplasms: enucleate or resect? J Gastrointest Surg 7:890–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Talamini MA, Moesinger R, Yeo CJ, Poulose B, Hruban RH, Cameron JL, Pitt HA (1998) Cystadenomas of the pancreas: is enucleation an adequate operation? Ann Surg 227:896–903

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pitt SC, Pitt HA, Baker MS, Christians K, Touzios JG, Kiely JM, Weber SM, Wilson SD, Howard TJ, Talamonti MS, Rikkers LF (2009) Small pancreatic and periampullary neuroendocrine tumors: resect or enucleate? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1692–1698

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nikfarjam M, Warshaw AL, Axelrod L, Deshpande V, Thayer SP, Ferrone CR, Fernandez-del Castillo C (2008) Improved contemporary surgical management of insulinomas. A 24-year experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Ann Surg 247:165–172

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Falconi M, Zerbi A, Crippa S, Balzano G, Boninsegna L, Capitanio V, Bassi C, Di Carlo V, Pederzoli P (2010) Parenchyma-preserving resections for small non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1621–1627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Madan AK, Weldon CB, Long WP, Raafat JD (2004) Solid and papillary epithelial neoplasm of the pancreas. J Surg Oncol 15:193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sciaudone G, Perniceni T, Levy P, Bougaran J, Gayet B (2000) Enucleation of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor of the head of the pancreas. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 24:17–20

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hackert T, Hinz U, Fritz S, Strobel O, Schneider L, Hartwig W, Büchler MW, Werner J (2011) Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:1197–1203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Langer P, Bartsch DK, Fendrich V, Kann PH, Rothmund M, Zielke A (2005) Minimal-invasive operative treatment of organic hyperinsulinism. Dtsch Med Wochschr 130:514–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernandez-Cruz L, Blanco L, Cosa R, Rendon H (2008) Is laparoscopic resection adequate in patients with neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors? World J Surg 32:904–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brient C, Regenet N, Sulpice L, Brunaud L, Mucci-Hennekine S, Carrère N, Milin J, Ayav A, Pradere B, Hamy A, Bresler L, Meunier B, Mirallié E (2012) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistulization subsequent to enucleation. J Gastrointest Surg 16(10):1883–1887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Büchler M (2005) International study group on pancreatic fistula definition (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG (2002) Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z’graggen K (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection. Toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS, Tomlinson JS, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY, Bentrem DJ (2008) Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Surg 247:490–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barakat MT, Meeran K, Bloom SR (2004) Neuroendocrine tumours. Endocrine-Related Cancer 11:1–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Norton JA (2006) Surgery for primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 10:327–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rha SE, Jung SE, Lee KH, Ku YM, Byun JY, Lee JM (2007) CT and MR imaging findings of endocrine tumor of the pancreas according to WHO classification. Eur J Radiol 62:371–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Langer P, Kann PH, Fendrich V, Richter G, Diehl S, Rothmund M, Bartsch DK (2004) Prospective evaluation of imaging procedures fort he detection of pancreaticoduodenal tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. World J Surg 28:1317–1322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Veronesi P, Cristallo, Di Carlo MV (2003) Surgical treatment of benign and borderline neoplasms of the pancreatic body. Dig Surg 20:506–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee CJ, Scheiman J, Anderson MA, Hines OJ, Reber HA, Farrell J, Kochman ML, Foley PJ, Drebin J, Oh YS, Ginsberg G, Ahmad N, Merchant NB, Isbell J, Parikh AA, Stokes JB, Bauer T, Adams RB, Simeone DM (2008) Risk of malignancy in resected cystic tumors of the pancreas ≤3 cm in size: Is it safe to observe asymptomatic patients? A multi-institutional report. J Gastroenterol Surg 12:234–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, Tomazic A, Bruns CJ, Busch OR, Farkas S, Belyaev O, Neoptolemos JP, Halloran C, Keck T, Niedergethmann M, Gellert K, Witzigmann H, Kollmar O, Langer P, Steger U, Neudecker J, Berrevoet F, Ganzera S, Heiss MM, Luntz SP, Bruckner T, Kieser M, Büchler MW (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy: a prospective randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 377:1514–1522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fernández-Cruz L, Molina V, Vallejos R, Jiménez Chavarria E, López-Boado MA, Ferrer J (2012) Outcome after laparoscopic enucleation for non-functional neuroendocrine pancreatic tumours. HPB (Oxford) 14:171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Drymousis P, Raptis DA, Spalding D, Fernandez-Cruz L, Menon D, Breitenstein S, Davidson B, Frilling A. Laparoscopic versus open pancreas resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2013 [Epub ahead of print].

  33. Bartsch DK, Waldmann J, Fendrich V, Boninsegna L, Lopez CL, Partelli S, Falconi M (2012) Impact of lymphadenectomy on survival after surgery for sporadic gastrinoma. Br J Surg 99:1234–1240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None of the authors has any potential or actual personal, financial, political, or competing interest. The study was not sponsored by any funding source.

Conflicts of Interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Philipps-University, Baldingerstraße, D-35043, Marburg, Germany

    Kristin Heeger, Jens Waldmann, Volker Fendrich & Detlef K. Bartsch

  2. Department of Surgery, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy

    Massimo Falconi, Stefano Partelli & Stefano Crippa

Authors
  1. Kristin Heeger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Massimo Falconi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefano Partelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jens Waldmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stefano Crippa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Volker Fendrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Detlef K. Bartsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin Heeger.

Additional information

Kristin Heeger and Massimo Falconi contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heeger, K., Falconi, M., Partelli, S. et al. Increased rate of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after deep enucleation of small pancreatic tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399, 315–321 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1171-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1171-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation