Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative study of patients with and without associated digestive surgery in a two-stage hepatectomy setting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the feasibility and outcomes of two-stage hepatectomy in patients with or without accompanying digestive surgery.

Methods

We analyzed prospectively data from 56 patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing two-stage hepatectomy between 1995 and 2009. Patients undergoing associated digestive resection (group I, n = 32) were compared with patients without associated digestive surgery (group II, n = 17).

Results

The feasibility rate was 87.5 % (49 patients). Neither the type and extent of hepatectomy nor the type of chemotherapy administered differed between the two groups. The median interval between hepatectomies was 1.79 and 2.07 months for groups I and II, respectively (not significant). One patient (group I) died of liver failure after the second hepatectomy. Postoperative morbidity rates were comparable: 37.5 % (group I) vs. 35.5 % (group II) after the first hepatectomy and 46.9 % (group I) vs. 52.9 % (group II) after the second hepatectomy. The median hospital stay after the first hepatectomy was longer in group I (13.5 days) than in group II (10 days) (P < 0.01). Median follow-up was 54 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 45.8 months, and 3- and 5-year OS were 58 and 31 %, respectively. Median OS was longer for group II (58 months) than for group I (34 months) (P = 0.048).

Conclusions

Digestive tract resection associated with two-stage hepatectomy does not increase postoperative mortality or morbidity nor does it lead to delay in chemotherapy or a reduction in cycles administered. The need for digestive tract surgery should not affect the surgical management of two-stage hepatectomy patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wicherts DA, Miller R, de Haas RJ et al (2008) Long-term results of two-stage hepatectomy for irresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Ann Surg 248:994–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Simmonds PC, Primrose JN, Colquitt JL, Garden OJ, Poston GJ, Rees M (2006) Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published studies. Br J Cancer 94:982–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chun YS, Vauthey JN, Ribero D et al (2007) Systemic chemotherapy and two-stage hepatectomy for extensive bilateral colorectal liver metastases: perioperative safety and survival. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1498–1504, discussion 504-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adam R, Laurent A, Azoulay D, Castaing D, Bismuth H (2000) Two-stage hepatectomy: a planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors. Ann Surg 232:777–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaeck D, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, Greget M, Weber JC, Bachellier P (2004) A two-stage hepatectomy procedure combined with portal vein embolization to achieve curative resection for initially unresectable multiple and bilobar colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 240:1037–1049, discussion 49-51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hillingso JG, Wille-Jorgensen P (2009) Staged or simultaneous resection of synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer—a systematic review. Color Dis 11:3–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Capussotti L, Ferrero A, Vigano L, Ribero D, Lo Tesoriere R, Polastri R (2007) Major liver resections synchronous with colorectal surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 14:195–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karoui M, Vigano L, Goyer P et al (2010) Combined first-stage hepatectomy and colorectal resection in a two-stage hepatectomy strategy for bilobar synchronous liver metastases. Br J Surg 97:1354–1362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pang YY (2000) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:333–339, HPB (Oxford) 2002; 4:99

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aydin HN, Remzi FH, Tekkis PP, Fazio VW (2005) Hartmann's reversal is associated with high postoperative adverse events. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2117–2126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaiser AM, Israelit S, Klaristenfeld D, Selvindoss P, Vukasin P, Ault G, Beart RW (2008) Morbidity of ostomy takedown. J Gastrointest Surg 12:437–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Akiyoshi T, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Kuroyanagi H, Ueno M, Oya M, Yamaguchi T (2010) Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor. World J Surg 34:1937–1942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsim N, Healey AJ, Frampton AE et al (2011) Two-stage resection for bilobar colorectal liver metastases: R0 resection is the key. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1939–1946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brouquet A, Abdalla EK, Kopetz S et al (2011) High survival rate after two-stage resection of advanced colorectal liver metastases: response-based selection and complete resection define outcome. J Clin Oncol 29:1083–1090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin RC 2nd, Augenstein V, Reuter NP, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM (2009) Simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Am Coll Surg 208:842–850, discussion 50-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin R, Paty P, Fong Y et al (2003) Simultaneous liver and colorectal resections are safe for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis. J Am Coll Surg 197:233–241, discussion 41-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T (2006) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD005200

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH (1999) Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 230:309–318, discussion 18-21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Thérèse Gargi for data management and Rob Stepney (medical writer, Charlbury, UK) for editing the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurélien Dupre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stella, M., Dupre, A., Chabaud, S. et al. A comparative study of patients with and without associated digestive surgery in a two-stage hepatectomy setting. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397, 1289–1296 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-1002-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-1002-0

Keywords

Navigation