Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

TNM classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison between 5th and 6th editions of the AJCC/UICC staging system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A few investigators have evaluated the TNM classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. The new sixth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Internal Union Against Cancer (UICC) staging system focuses on vascular invasion and regional lymph node metastasis.

Methods

For 166 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma undergoing R0 resection, survival curves stratified according to TNM classifications were compared between fifth and sixth editions.

Results

The previous T3 now is divided into T3 and T4. Most new pT4 patients had invasion of the portal bifurcation; their survival was poorer than that for new pT3 patients. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were worse in the previous stage III than in the previous stage IVA, although the difference fell short of significance. The previous stage IVA (T3AnyNM0) is divided into new stages: IIA (T3N0M0), IIB (T1-3N1M0), and III (T4AnyNM0). All patients in stage III had invasion of the portal bifurcation. Survival was similar between stages IA, IB, and IIA, while patients with T4N0M0 tumors survived longer than those with T4N1M0 tumors and similarly to those with stage IIB tumors.

Conclusions

The sixth edition provided improved prediction of survival in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; for still better prediction, cancer invasion of the portal bifurcation and regional lymph node metastasis should be weighted equally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pitt HA, Nakeeb A, Abrams RA, Coleman J, Piantadosi S, Yeo CJ, Lillemore KD, Cameron JL (1995) Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: postoperative radiotherapy does not improve survival. Ann Surg 221:788–798

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Sohn TA, Coleman J, Abrams RA, Piantadosi S, Hruban R, Lillemore KD, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL (1996) Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Ann Surg 224:463–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarmiento JM, Nagorney DM (2002) Hepatic resection in the treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Oncol N Am 11:893–908

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Shionoya S (1990) Hepatic segmentectomy with caudate lobe resection for bile duct carcinoma of the hepatic hilus. World J Surg 14:535–544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, Maeda S, Kondo S, Yasui A, Shionoya S (1991) Combined portal vein and liver resection for carcinoma of the biliary tract. Br J Surg 78:727–731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pichlmayr R, Weimann A, Klempnauer J, Oldhafer KJ, Maschek H, Tusch G, Ringe B (1996) Surgical treatment in proximal bile duct cancer. Ann Surg 224:628–638

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Klempnauer J, Ridder GJ, von Wasielewski R, Werner M, Weimann A, Pichlmayr R (1997) Resectional surgery of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. J Clin Oncol 15:947–954

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kosuge T, Yamamoto J, Shimada K, Yamasaki S, Makuuchi M (1999) Improved surgical results for hilar cholangiocarcinoma with procedures including major hepatic resection. Ann Surg 230:663–671

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Launois B, Terblanche J, Lakehal M, Catheline JM, Bardaxoglou E, Landen S, Campion JP, Sutherland F, Meunier B (1999) Proximal bile duct cancer: high respectability rate and 5-year survival. Ann Surg 230:266–275

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Lohmann R, Radke C, Kling N, Wex C, Lobeck H, Hintze R (1999) Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 230:808–819

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Nagino M, Uesaka K, Oda K, Sano T, Yamamoto H, Hayakawa N (2000) Aggressive preoperative management and extended surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Nagoya experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 7:155–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SG, Lee YJ, Park KM, Hwang S, Min PC (2000) One hundred and eleven liver resections for hilar bile duct cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 7:135–141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsao JI, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Hayakawa N, Kondo S, Nagino M, Miyachi M, Kanai M, Uesaka K, Oda K, Rossi RL, Braasch JW, Dugan JM (2000) Management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Comparison of an American and a Japanese experience. Ann Surg 232:166–174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Figueras J, Llado L, Valls C, Serrano T, Ramos E, Fabregat J, Rafecas A, Torras J, Jaurrieta E (2000) Changing strategies in diagnosis and management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Transplant 6:786–794

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Burke EC, Jarnagin WR, Hochwald SN, Pisters PWT, Fong Y, Blumgart LH (1998) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system. Ann Surg 228:385–394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Gonen M, Burke E, Bodniewicz J, Youssef M, Klimstra D, Blumgart LH (2001) Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 234:507–519

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, Morrow M (eds) (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ebata T, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Uesaka K, Nagasaki T, Nimura Y (2003) Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 238:720–727

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (1997) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 5th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Kennedy BJ, Murphy GP, O’Sullivan B, Sobin LH, Yarbo JW (eds) (1997) AJCC cancer staging manual, 5th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  22. Su CH, Tsay SH, Wu CC, Shyr YM, King KL, Lee CH, Lui WY, Liu TJ, Peng FK (1996) Factors influencing postoperative morbidity, mortality, and survival after resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 223:384–394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kitagawa Y, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Uesaka K, Sano T, Yamamoto H, Hayakawa N, Nimura Y (2001) Lymph node metastasis from hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 110 patients who underwent regional and paraaortic node dissection. Ann Surg 233:385–392

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhuiya MR, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Fukata S, Hayakawa N, Shionoya S (1992) Clinicopathological studies on perineural invasion of bile duct carcinoma. Ann Surg 215:344–349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sakamoto E, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Nagino M, Kanai M, Miyachi M, Uesaka K (1998) The pattern of infiltration at the proximal border of hilar bile duct carcinoma: a histologic analysis of 62 resected cases. Ann Surg 227:405–411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nishio H, Kamiya J, Nagino M, Kanai M, Uesaka K, Sakamoto E, Fukatsu T, Nimura Y (1999) Value of percutaneous transhepatic portography before hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 86:1415–1421

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tojima Y, Nagino M, Ebata T, Uesaka K, Kamiya J, Nimura Y (2003) Immunohistochemically demonstrated lymph node micrometastasis and prognosis in patients with otherwise node-negative hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 237:201–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chamberlain RS, Blumgart LH (2000) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a review and commentary. Ann Surg Oncol 7:55–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Uesaka K, Kin Y, Kutsuna Y, Hayakawa N, Yamamoto H (1995) Right or left trisegmental portal vein embolization before hepatic trisegmentectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 117:677–681

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan

    Hideki Nishio, Masato Nagino, Koji Oda, Tomoki Ebata, Toshiyuki Arai & Yuji Nimura

Authors
  1. Hideki Nishio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masato Nagino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Koji Oda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tomoki Ebata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Toshiyuki Arai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuji Nimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuji Nimura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nishio, H., Nagino, M., Oda, K. et al. TNM classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison between 5th and 6th editions of the AJCC/UICC staging system. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390, 319–327 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0561-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0561-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation