Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Properties of 3D rotations and their relation to eye movement control

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Rotations of the eye are generated by the torques that the eye muscles apply to the eye. The relationship between eye orientation and the direction of the torques generated by the extraocular muscles is therefore central to any understanding of the control of three-dimensional eye movements of any type. We review the geometrical properties that dictate the relationship between muscle pulling direction and 3D eye orientation. We then show how this relation can be used to test the validity of oculomotor control hypotheses. We test the common modeling assumption that the extraocular muscle pairs can be treated as single bidirectional muscles. Finally, we investigate the consequences of assuming fixed muscle pulley locations when modeling the control of eye movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Demer JL, Miller JM, Poukens V, Vinters HV, Glasgow BJ (1995) Evidence for fibromuscular pulleys of the recti extraocular muscles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:1135–1136

    Google Scholar 

  2. Demer JL, Oh SY, Poukens V (2000) Evidence for active control of rectus extraocular muscle pulleys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1280–1290

    Google Scholar 

  3. Demer JL, Kono R, Wright W (2003a) Magnetic resonance imaging of human extraocular muscles in convergence. J Neurophysiol 89:2072–85

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demer JL, Oh SY, Clark RA, Poukens V (2003b) Evidence for a pulley of the inferior oblique muscle. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:3856–3865

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haustein W (1989) Considerations on listing’s law and the primary position by means of a matrix description of eye position control. Biol Cybern 60:411–420

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hepp K (1994) Oculomotor control: listing’s law and all that. Curr Opin Neurobiol 4:862–868

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koene AR (2002) Eye mechanics and their implications for eye movement control. Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands ISBN 90-393-3185-5

  8. Miller JM, Robinson DA (1984) A model of the mechanics of binocular alignment. Comput Biomed Res 17:436–470

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller JM, Demer JL, Rosenbaum AL (1993) Effect of transposition surgery on rectus muscle paths by magnetic resonance imaging. Ophthalmology 100:475–487

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller JM, Pavlovski DS, Shamaeva I (1999) Orbit tm 1.8 Gaze mechanics simulation, Eidactics, San Francisco

  11. Misslisch H, Tweed D (2001) Neural and mechanical factors in eye control. J Neurophysiol 86:1877–1883

    Google Scholar 

  12. Porrill J, Warren PA, Dean P (2000) A simple control law generates Listing’s positions in a detailed model of the extraocular muscle system. Vision Res 40:3743–3758

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quaia C, Optican LM (1998) Commutative saccadic generator is sufficient to control a 3-D ocular plant with pulleys. J Neurophysiol 79:3197–3215

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quaia C, Optican LM (2003) Dynamic eye plant models and the control of eye movements. Strabismus 11:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raphan T (1998) Modeling control of eye orientation in three dimensions: I. role of muscle pulleys in determining saccadic trajectory. J Neurophysiol 79:2653–2667

    Google Scholar 

  16. Robinson DA (1975) A quantitative analysis of extraocular muscle cooperation and squint. Invest Ophthalmol 14:801–825

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schnablok C, Raphan T (1994) Modeling three-dimensional velocity to position transformation in oculomotor control. J Neurophysiol 71:623–638

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith MA, Crawford JD (1998) Neural control of rotational kinematics within realistic vestibuloocular coordinate systems. J Neurophysiol 80:2295–2315

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thurtell MJ, Kunin M, Raphan T (2000) Role of muscle pulleys in producing eye position-dependence in the angular vestibuloocular reflex: a model-based study. J Neurophysiol 84: 639–650

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tweed D (1997) Three-dimensional model of the human eye-head saccadic system. J Neurophysiol 77:654–66

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tweed D, Vilis T (1987) Implications of rotational kinematics for the oculomotor system in three dimensions. J Neurophysiol 58:823–849

    Google Scholar 

  22. von Helmholtz H (1867) Handbuch der physiologischen optik. Leipzig: Voss (English translation: Treatise on physiological optics. Dover, New York, 1962)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Helmholtz Institute, Physics, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

    Ansgar R. Koene & Casper J. Erkelens

Authors
  1. Ansgar R. Koene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Casper J. Erkelens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ansgar R. Koene.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koene, A., Erkelens, C. Properties of 3D rotations and their relation to eye movement control. Biol. Cybern. 90, 410–417 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-004-0477-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-004-0477-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation