Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ischemic preconditioning boosts post-exercise but not resting cardiac vagal control in endurance runners

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

High cardiac vagal control in endurance athletes has been generally associated with adequate recovery from training and readiness to cope high-intensity training. A method that improves cardiac vagal control in endurance athletes could therefore be advantageous. Accordingly, we sought to test whether ischemic preconditioning (IPC) could enhance cardiac vagal control in endurance runners.

Methods

Fifteen subjects underwent IPC, sham ultrasound (SHAM) or control (CT), in random order. Subjects were informed both IPC and SHAM would be beneficial vs. CT (i.e., similar placebo induction), and IPC would be harmless despite ischemia sensations (i.e., nocebo avoidance). Resting cardiac vagal control was assessed via respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and heart rate variability (HRV) indexes. Post-exercise cardiac vagal control was assessed via heart rate recovery [HR time constant decay (T30) and absolute HR decay (HRR30s)] during 30-s breaks of a discontinuous incremental test. Capillary blood samples were collected for lactate threshold identification.

Results

RSA and HRV were similar among interventions at pre- and post-intervention assessments. Lactate threshold occurred at 85 ± 4% of maximal effort. T30 was similar among interventions, but IPC increased HRR30s at 70% and 75% of maximal effort vs. SHAM and CT (70%: IPC = 31 ± 2 vs. SHAM = 26 ± 3 vs. CT = 26 ± 2 bpm, mean ± SEM, P < 0.01; 75%: IPC = 29 ± 2 vs. SHAM = 25 ± 2 vs. CT = 24 ± 2 bpm, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

IPC did not change resting cardiac vagal control, but boosted fast post-exercise cardiac vagal reactivation at exercise intensities below lactate threshold in endurance runners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

CT:

Resting control

CV:

Coefficient of variation

E/I max :

Ratio between the longest R–R interval among all expirations and the shortest R–R interval among all inspirations

E/I mean :

Ratio between the mean of the longest R–R interval of each expiration and the mean of the shortest R–R interval of each inspiration

HF:

High frequency

HR:

Heart rate

HRex:

Heart rate at the end of a given stage of the discontinuous incremental

HRR:

Heart rate recovery

HRR30s:

Heart rate recovery at 30 s post-exercise

HRR60s:

Heart rate recovery at 60 s post-exercise

HRV:

Heart rate variability

ICC:

Intra-class correlation coefficient

IPC:

Ischemic preconditioning

LF:

Low frequency

LF/HF:

Ratio between low- and high-frequency powers of heart rate variability

Ln:

Natural logarithm of the RMSSD was divided by the mean R–R interval

RMSSD:

Square root of the mean squared differences between consecutive R–R intervals

RRi:

R–R intervals

RSA:

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

SHAM:

Sham ultrasound

SWC:

Smallest worthwhile change

TP:

Total power

T30:

Time constant of heart rate decay

VLF:

Very low frequency

\(\dot {V}{{\text{O}}_{{\text{2max}}}}\) :

Maximal oxygen consumption

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The time and effort expended by all the volunteer subjects is greatly appreciated.

Funding

J.L.S. and M.P. received scholarship from the Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES). J.L.S., M.P. and T.O. received scholarship from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP; grants: 2014/15877-8, 2015/22198-2 and 2015/03572-0, respectively). B.M.S received funding from FAPESP (Grant: 2014/25683-6) and CNPq (Grant: 461516/2014-4) to conduct the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JLS, TRL and BMS conceived and designed research. JLS, TO, TRL and THNF conducted experiments. JLS, TO, MP and TRL analyzed data. All authors interpreted the results of experiments. JLS and BMS prepared the figures and tables. JLS, BMS drafted the manuscript. All authors edited, revised and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Moreira Silva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors declares a conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Massimo Pagani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabino-Carvalho, J.L., Obeid-Freitas, T., Paula-Ribeiro, M. et al. Ischemic preconditioning boosts post-exercise but not resting cardiac vagal control in endurance runners. Eur J Appl Physiol 119, 621–632 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-4052-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-4052-3

Keywords

Navigation