Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender specific activation patterns of trunk muscles during whole body tilt

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gender specific differences as evidenced in both anthropometric data and physical performance of healthy persons have been broadly demonstrated. Recently advancements in surface electromyography (SEMG) have shown possible differences in men’s and women’s muscle coordination patterns. However, quantitative information about gender related muscle co-ordination patterns are rare. This investigation was carried out to both verify if trunk muscle SEMG amplitude–force relationship differs between men and women and refine techniques of measurement and data analysis using SEMG. Thirty-one healthy volunteers (16 women, 15 men) were investigated during whole body tilt at angles from 5° to 90° (from quasi vertical to horizontal position). Subjects had to maintain body in body axis while their lower body was fixed and the upper body remained unsupported. SEMG was taken from five different trunk muscles of both sides simultaneously. At corresponding tilt angles women exhibited higher amplitude levels of their abdominal muscles in comparison to men, who were characterized by higher back muscle amplitudes. Abdominal muscles showed a non-linear SEMG amplitude–force relationship but differed between genders with more linearity in women. Back muscles showed a linear amplitude–force relationship with no differences between genders. Women were characterized by higher levels of co-contraction of all investigated muscles. The data are in accordance with histological investigations, which already proved specific fiber distribution patterns in both abdominal and back muscles and gender related differences in relative area of Type 1 fibers of back muscles. The observed differences in SEMG–force relationship for the abdominal muscles remain hypothetical because of lack of histological information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anders C, Bretschneider S, Bernsdorf A, Erler K, Schneider W (2004) Activation of shoulder muscles in healthy men and women under isometric conditions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14:699–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anders C, Scholle HC, Wagner H, Puta C, Grassme R, Petrovitch A (2005) Trunk muscle co-ordination during gait: relationship between muscle function and acute low back pain. Pathophysiology 12:243–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt Nielsen L, Graven Nielsen T, Svarrer H, Svensson P (1996) The influence of low back pain on muscle activity and coordination during gait: a clinical and experimental study. Pain 64:231–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsell S, Pearsall AW, Heitman RJ, Helms CA, Major NM, Speer KP (2000) The relationship of age, gender, and degenerative changes observed on radiographs of the shoulder in asymptomatic individuals. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1135–1139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson RG, Riek S (2001) Changes in muscle recruitment patterns during skill acquisition. Exp Brain Res 138:71–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark BC, Manini TM, Ploutz-Snyder LL (2003a) Derecruitment of the lumbar musculature with fatiguing trunk extension exercise. Spine 28:282–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark BC, Manini TM, The DJ, Doldo NA, Ploutz-Snyder LL (2003b) Gender differences in skeletal muscle fatigability are related to contraction type and EMG spectral compression. J Appl Physiol 94:2263–2272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RG, Holli S, Jayson MIV (1992) Gender variation of human spinal and paraspinal structures. Clin Biomech 7:120–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtenay WH (1998) College men’s health: an overview and a call to action. J Am Coll Health 46:279–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denner A (1998) Analyse und Training der wirbelsäulenstabilisierenden Muskulatur. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfving B, Dedering A, Nemeth G (2003) Lumbar muscle fatigue and recovery in patients with long-term low-back trouble-electromyography and health-related factors. Clin Biomech 18:619–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB (1998) Muscle distribution: variations with body weight, gender, and age. Appl Radiat Isot 49:733–734

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greil H (2001) Körpermaße 2000: aktuelle Perzentilwerte der deutschen Bevölkerung im jungen Erwachsenenalter. Brandenburgisches Umweltforschungszentrum, 2001. http://pub.ub.uni-potsdam.de/volltexte/2005/388/. Cited 24 May 2005

  • Haggmark T, Thorstensson A (1979) Fibre types in human abdominal muscles. Acta Physiol Scand 107:319–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hakkinen K, Komi PV (1983) Changes in neuromuscular performance in voluntary and reflex contraction during strength training in man. Int J Sports Med 4:282–288

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Merletti R, Stegeman DF, Blok J, Rau G, Disselhorst-Klug C, Hägg G (1999) European recommendations for surface ElectroMyoGraphy, results of the SENIAM project. Roessingh Research and Development b.v., Roessingh

  • Hodges PW, Richardson CA (1996) Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain. A motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine 21:2640–2650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges PW, Richardson CA (1998) Delayed postural contraction of transversus abdominis in low back pain associated with movement of the lower limb. J Spinal Disord 11:46–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang ZM, Ross R (2000) Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr. J Appl Physiol 89:81–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kankaanpää M, Taimela S, Webber CL, Airaksinen O, Hänninen O (1997) Lumbar paraspinal muscle fatigability in repetitive isoinertial loading: EMG spectral indices, Borg scale and endurance time. Eur J Appl Physiol 76:236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kankaanpää M, Laaksonen D, Taimela S, Kokko SM, Airaksinen O, Hanninen O (1998) Age, sex, and body mass index as determinants of back and hip extensor fatigue in the isometric Sorensen back endurance test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79:1069–1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller TS, Roy AL (2002) Posture-dependent isometric trunk extension and flexion strength in normal male and female subjects. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:312–318

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller A, Brox JI, Gunderson R, Holm I, Friis A, Reikeras O (2004) Trunk muscle strength, cross-sectional area, and density in patients with chronic low back pain randomized to lumbar fusion or cognitive intervention and exercises. Spine 29:3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan DC, Todd MK, Della Croce U (1998) Gender differences in joint biomechanics during walking: normative study in young adults. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 77:2–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence JH, De Luca CJ (1983) Myoelectric signal versus force relationship in different human muscles. J Appl Physiol 54:1653–1659

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lay BS, Sparrow WA, Hughes KM, O’Dwyer NJ (2002) Practice effects on coordination and control, metabolic energy expenditure, and muscle activation. Hum Mov Sci 21:807–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lephart SM, Ferris CM, Riemann BL, Myers JB, Fu FH (2002) Gender differences in strength and lower extremity kinematics during landing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 401:162–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mannion AF (1999) Fibre type characteristics and function of the human paraspinal muscles: normal values and changes in association with low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 9:363–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mannion AF, Dumas GA, Cooper RG, Espinosa FJ, Faris MW, Stevenson JM (1997) Muscle fiber size and type distribution in thoracic and lumbar regions of erector spinae in healthy subjects without low back pain: normal values and sex differences. J Anat 190(Pt 4):505–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannion AF, Dvorak J, Taimela S, Muntener M (2001) Increase in strength after active therapy in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients: muscular adaptations and clinical relevance. Schmerz 15:468–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marras WS, Jorgensen MJ, Granata KP, Wiand B (2001) Female and male trunk geometry: size and prediction of the spine loading trunk muscles derived from MRI. Clin Biomech 16:38–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer JM, Graves JE, Udermann BE, Ploutz-Snyder LL (2002) Quantification of the loading characteristics of the upper body and back extension strength on a variable angle Roman chair. J Back Musculoskeletal Rehabil 16:95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill SM, Grenier S, Kavcic N, Cholewicki J (2003) Coordination of muscle activity to assure stability of the lumbar spine. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13:353–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNair PJ, Depledge J, Brettkelly M, Stanley SN (1996) Verbal encouragement: effects on maximum effort voluntary muscle action. Br J Sports Med 30:243–245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AE, MacDougall JD, Tarnopolsky MA, Sale DG (1993) Gender differences in strength and muscle fiber characteristics. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 66:254–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mirka GA (1991) The quantification of EMG normalization error. Ergonomics 34:343–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mital A, Kumar S (1998) Human muscle strength definitions, measurement, and usage: part I—guidelines for the practitioner. Int J Ind Ergon 22:101–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng JK, Kippers V, Richardson CA (1998) Muscle fibre orientation of abdominal muscles and suggested surface EMG electrode positions. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 38:51–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panjabi MM (1992) The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord 5:390–396

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simoneau JA, Bouchard C (1989) Human variation in skeletal muscle fiber-type proportion and enzyme activities. Am J Physiol 257:E567–E572

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith LK, Lelas JL, Kerrigan DC (2002) Gender differences in pelvic motions and center of mass displacement during walking: stereotypes quantified. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 11:453–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solomonow M, Baratta R, Shoji H, D’Ambrosia R (1990) The EMG–force relationships of skeletal muscle; dependence on contraction rate, and motor units control strategy. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 30:141–152

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staron RS, Hagerman FC, Hikida RS, Murray TF, Hostler DP, Crill MT, Ragg KE, Toma K (2000) Fiber type composition of the vastus lateralis muscle of young men and women. J Histochem Cytochem 48:623–629

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorstensson A, Carlson H (1987) Fibre types in human lumbar back muscles. Acta Physiol Scand 131:195–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toft I, Lindal S, Bonaa KH, Jenssen T (2003) Quantitative measurement of muscle fiber composition in a normal population. Muscle Nerve 28:101–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Dieen JH, Cholewicki J, Radebold A (2003) Trunk muscle recruitment patterns in patients with low back pain enhance the stability of the lumbar spine. Spine 28:834–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaciorskij WM, Aruin AS, Selujanow WN (1984) Biomechanik der menschlichen Bewegungsapparates. Sportverlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Zazulak BT, Ponce PL, Straub SJ, Medvecky MJ, Avedisian L, Hewett TE (2005) Gender comparison of hip muscle activity during single-leg landing. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35:292–299

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Mrs Elke Mey for technical assistance and Ms Marcie Matthews for language correction.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinic for Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, Division for Motor Research, Pathophysiology and Biomechanics, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 07740, Jena, Germany

    Christoph Anders, Gunther Brose, Gunther O. Hofmann & Hans-Christoph Scholle

Authors
  1. Christoph Anders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gunther Brose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gunther O. Hofmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hans-Christoph Scholle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Anders.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anders, C., Brose, G., Hofmann, G.O. et al. Gender specific activation patterns of trunk muscles during whole body tilt. Eur J Appl Physiol 101, 195–205 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0490-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0490-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation