Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of Margaria staircase test: the effect of body size

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the methodology of Margaria staircase test (MT) for assessment of muscle anaerobic power. Specifically, we hypothesized that due to the scaling effects the outcome of MT calculated using the standard formula that suggests the power output to be proportional to body mass [P = (m · g · h)/T; P = power output, m = body mass, = 9.81 m/s2, h = height of stairs climbed, T = running time] overestimates the effect of body size on the calculated muscle power output. Young and physically active subjects (= 111) were tested and the relationship between P and body size (S; either body mass or height) was assessed by standard allometric model (i.e., P = a · S b; where a and b were the constant multiplier and allometric parameter, respectively). The results supported the hypothesized relationship by revealing = 0.66 (95%CI = 0.49–0.83; r = 0.59; P < 0.001) and = 1.13 (95%CI = 0.49–0.83; r = 0.34; P < 0.001) for body mass and body height, respectively. The obtained values of b (i.e., b < 1 for body mass and < 3 for body height) suggest that the standard formula of MT overestimates the power output of larger subjects and underestimates the power of smaller ones. Since the results were mainly in line with both the experimental findings and theoretical predictions regarding the general effects of scale on human muscle power, we propose a modified formula that provides normalized power: P n  = P/m 0.67 = [(m · g · h)/T]/m 0.67 = (m 0.33  · g · h)/T. The modified formula could provide a body size independent index of muscle power that would both allow for establishing standards and enable comparison of individuals and groups of individuals of different body dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Abernethy P, Wilson G, Logan P (1995) Strength and power assessment. Issues, controversies and challenges. Sports Med 19:401–417

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Astrand P-O, Rodahl K (1986) Textbook of work physiology, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 392–412

  • Batterham AM, George KP (1997) Allometric modeling does not determine a dimensionless power function ratio for maximal muscular function. J Appl Physiol 83(6):2158–2166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard C, Taylor AW, Simoneau JA, Dulac S (1991) Testing anaerobic power and capacity. In: MacDougail JD, Wenger HA, Green HJ (eds) Physiological testing of the high-performance athlete, 2nd edn. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 175–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiozzo VJ, Kyle CR (1980) The effect of external loading upon power output in stair climbing. Eur J Appl Physiol 44:217–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies MJ, Dalsky GP (1997) Normalizing strength for body size differences in older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29(5):713–717

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harman E, Garhammer J, Pandorf C (2000) Administration, scoring, and interpretation of selected tests. In: Bachle TR, Earle RW (eds) Essentials of strength training and conditioning, 2nd edn. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 287–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill AV (1950) The dimensions of animals and their muscular dynamics. Sci Prog 38:209–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaric S (2002) Muscle strength testing: the use of normalization for body size. Sports Med 32:615–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaric S (2003) Role of body size in the relation between muscle strength and movement performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 31(1):8–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaric S, Mirkov D, Markovic G (2005) Normalizing physical performance tests for body size: a proposal for standardization. J Strength Cond Res 19:467–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kitigawa K, Suzuki M, Myashita M (1980) Anaerobic power output of young obese man; comparison with non-obese man and the role of excess fat. Eur J Appl Physiol 43:229–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margaria R, Aghemo P, Rovelli E (1966) Measurement of muscular power (anaerobic) in man. J Appl Physiol 21(5):1662–1664

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markovic G, Jaric S (2004) Movement performance and body size: the relationship for different groups of tests. Eur J Appl Physiol 92:139–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markovic G, Jaric S (2005) Scaling of muscle power to body size: the effect of stretch-shortening cycle. Eur J Appl Physiol 95:11–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon TA (1984) Muscles, reflexes and locomotion. Princeton Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevill AM, Stewart AD, Olds T, Holder R (2004) Are adult physiques geometrically similar? The dangers of allometric scaling using body mass power laws. Am J Phys Anthrop 124:177–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newton RU, Kraemer WJ (1994) Developing explosive muscular power: implications for a mixed methods training strategy. Strength Cond 16:20–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton K, Marfell-Jones M, Whittingham N, Kerr D, Carter L, Saddington K, Gore CJ (2000) Anthropometric assessment protocols. In: Gore CJ (ed) Physiological tests for elite athletes. Australian Sports Commission, Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 66–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton JF, Dugan A (1987) An evaluation of test of anaerobic power. Aviat Space Environ Med 58:237–242

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vandewalle H, Peres G, Monod H (1987) Standard anaerobic exercise tests. Sports Med 4:268–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Praagh E, Dore E (2002) Short-term muscle power during growth and maturation. Sports Med 32:701–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmore JH (1983) Body composition in sport and exercise: direction for future research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 15:21–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GJ, Murphy AJ (1996) The use of isometric tests of muscular function in athletic assessment. Sports Med 22:19–37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported in part by grant from Serbian Research Council (#145082).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Slobodan Jaric.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nedeljkovic, A., Mirkov, D.M., Pazin, N. et al. Evaluation of Margaria staircase test: the effect of body size. Eur J Appl Physiol 100, 115–120 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0401-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0401-3

Keywords

Navigation