Abstract
The localization precision is a crucial and important parameter for single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) and directly influences the achievable spatial resolution. It primarily depends on experimental imaging conditions and the registration potency of the algorithm used. We propose a new and simple routine to estimate the average experimental localization precision in SMLM, based on the nearest neighbor analysis. By exploring different experimental and simulated targets, we show that this approach can be generally used for any 2D or 3D SMLM data and that reliable values for the localization precision σ SMLM are obtained. Knowing σ SMLM is a prerequisite for consistent visualization or any quantitative structural analysis, e.g., cluster analysis or colocalization studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banterle N, Bui KH et al (2013) Fourier ring correlation as a resolution criterion for super-resolution microscopy. J Struct Biol 183(3):363–367
Betzig E, Patterson GH et al (2006) Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313:1642–1645
Bobroff N (1986) Position measurement with a resolution and noise-limited instrument. Rev Sci Instrum 57(6):1152–1157
Cheezum MK, Walker WF et al (2001) Quantitative comparison of algorithms for tracking single fluorescent particles. Biophys J 81(4):2378–2388
Churchman LS, Flyvbjerg H et al (2006) A non-Gaussian distribution quantifies distances measured with fluorescence localization techniques. Biophys J 90(2):668–671
Desai A (2012) Fluorescence procedures for the actin and tubulin cytoskeleton in fixed cells. http://mitchison.med.harvard.edu/protocols/general/Fluorescence%20Procedures%20for%20the%20Actin%20and%20Tubulin%20Cytoskeleton%20in%20Fixed%20Cells.pdf
DeSantis MC, DeCenzo SH et al (2010) Precision analysis for standard deviation measurements of immobile single fluorescent molecule images. Opt Express 18(7):6563–6576
Deschout H, Neyts K et al (2012) The influence of movement on the localization precision of sub-resolution particles in fluorescence microscopy. J Biophotonics 5(1):97–109
Endesfelder U, van de Linde S et al (2010) Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence microscopy of myosin-actin motility. ChemPhysChem 11(4):836–840
Endesfelder U, Malkusch S et al (2011) Chemically induced photoswitching of fluorescent probes—a general concept for super-resolution microscopy. Molecules 16(4):3106–3118
Fitzgerald JE, Lu J et al (2012) Estimation theoretic measure of resolution for stochastic localization microscopy. Phys Rev Lett 109(4):048102
Heilemann M, van de Linde S et al (2008) Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging with conventional fluorescent probes. Angew Chem Int Ed 47(33):6172–6176
Huang B, Wang W et al (2008) Three-dimensional super-resolution imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy. Science 319(5864):810–813
Jia H, Yang J et al (2010) Minimum variance unbiased subpixel centroid estimation of point image limited by photon shot noise. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 27(9):2038–2045
Kubitscheck U, Kuckmann O et al (2000) Imaging and tracking of single GFP molecules in solution. Biophys J 78(4):2170–2179
Lando D, Endesfelder U et al (2012) Quantitative single-molecule microscopy reveals that CENP-A(Cnp1) deposition occurs during G2 in fission yeast. Open Biol 2(7):120078
Loschberger A, van de Linde S et al (2012) Super-resolution imaging visualizes the eightfold symmetry of gp210 proteins around the nuclear pore complex and resolves the central channel with nanometer resolution. J Cell Sci 125(Pt 3):570–575
Moerner WE, Kador L (1989) Optical detection and spectroscopy of single molecules in a solid. Phys Rev Lett 62(21):2535–2538
Mortensen KI, Churchman LS et al (2010) Optimized localization analysis for single-molecule tracking and super-resolution microscopy. Nat Methods 7(5):377–381
Mukamel EA, Schnitzer MJ (2012) Unified resolution bounds for conventional and stochastic localization fluorescence microscopy. Phys Rev Lett 109(16):168102
Muranyi W, Malkusch S et al (2013) Super-resolution microscopy reveals specific recruitment of HIV-1 envelope proteins to viral assembly sites dependent on the envelope C-terminal tail. PLoS Pathog 9(2):e1003198
Nieuwenhuizen RPJ, Lidke KA et al (2013) Measuring image resolution in optical nanoscopy. Nat Methods 10(6):557
Ober RJ, Ram S et al (2004) Localization accuracy in single-molecule microscopy. Biophys J 86(2):1185–1200
Oliphant TE (2007) Python for scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng 9(3):10–20
Olivier N, Keller D et al (2013) Resolution doubling in 3D-STORM imaging through improved buffers. PLoS ONE 8(7):e69004
Orrit M, Bernard J (1990) Single pentacene molecules detected by fluorescence excitation in a p-terphenyl crystal. Phys Rev Lett 65(21):2716–2719
Ram S, Ward ES et al (2006) Beyond Rayleigh’s criterion: a resolution measure with application to single-molecule microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(12):4457–4462
Rust MJ, Bates M et al (2006) Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat Methods 3(10):793–795
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):676–682
Shannon CE (1949) Communication in the presence of noise. Proc Inst Radio Eng 37(1):10–21
Small AR (2009) Theoretical limits on errors and acquisition rates in localizing switchable fluorophores. Biophys J 96(2):L16–L18
Steinhauer C, Jungmann R et al (2009) DNA origami as a nanoscopic ruler for super-resolution microscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 48(47):8870–8873
Thompson RE, Larson DR et al (2002) Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. Biophys J 82:2775–2783
Truan Z, Tarancon Diez L et al (2013) Quantitative morphological analysis of arrestin2 clustering upon G protein-coupled receptor stimulation by super-resolution microscopy. J Struct Biol 184(2):329–334
Vaughan JC, Jia S et al (2012) Ultrabright photoactivatable fluorophores created by reductive caging. Nat Methods 9(12):1181–1184
Vaughan JC, Dempsey GT et al (2013) Phosphine quenching of cyanine dyes as a versatile tool for fluorescence microscopy. J Am Chem Soc 135(4):1197–1200
Wolter S, Schuttpelz M et al (2010) Real-time computation of subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence images. J Microsc 237(1):12–22
Wolter S, Endesfelder U et al (2011) Measuring localization performance of super-resolution algorithms on very active samples. Opt Express 19(8):7020–7033
Yau W, Zhiping L et al (2011) Limit of the accuracy of parameter estimation for moving single molecules imaged by fluorescence microscopy. Signal Process IEEE Trans 59(3):895–911
Acknowledgments
We thank Steve Wolter for helpful discussions. We acknowledge funding by the German Ministry of Education and Research (Grants 0315262 and 0316170D) and the cluster of excellence “Macromolecular Complexes” (CEF, DFG cluster of excellence (EXC 115)).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Endesfelder, U., Malkusch, S., Fricke, F. et al. A simple method to estimate the average localization precision of a single-molecule localization microscopy experiment. Histochem Cell Biol 141, 629–638 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-014-1192-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-014-1192-3