Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison between non-visualized polyps and visualized polyps on optical coherence tomography angiography in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the underlying reasons for the non-visualization of polyps on en face optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).

Methods

A cross-sectional study of consecutive treatment-naïve 30 eyes with active PCV was included. Results of fundus photography, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and en face OCTA were analyzed.

Results

A total of 64 active polyps were found on FFA and ICGA in 30 eyes. On OCTA, 42/64 (65.6%) polyps were visualized, while 22/64 (34.4%) polyps were non-visualized. There were no significant differences in the size (P = 0.723) and filling time of polyps (P = 0.558) between the two groups. However, polypoidal lesions were less common in the non-visualized group (P < 0.001). The height of the polyps on SD-OCT was 243.95 ± 114.24 μm in the non-visualized group, which was higher than those (188.00 ± 87.93 μm) in the visualized group (P = 0.048). Moreover, more pulsatile polyps (72.7%) were found in the non-visualized group than those (2.4%) in the visualized group (P < 0.001). Four of the 22 polyps in the non-visualized group (18.2%) were located under a thick subretinal hemorrhage, and two of 22 invisible polyps (9.6%) located under and parallel to the retinal vessel in the inner layer of retina.

Conclusions

Our results revealed that the height of the polyps, and not the size and pulsation of the polyps, correlated with the visualization of the polyps on OCTA. Polyps that were pulsating in early ICGA were difficult to be visualized on OCTA, which is the most possible reason for the non-visualization. Coverage with thick subretinal hemorrhage or retina vessels was another reason for the non-visualization of the polyps in active PCV on OCTA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yannuzzi LA, Sorenson J, Spaide RF, Lipson B (1990) Idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (IPCV). Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 10:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Laude A, Cackett PD, Vithana EN, Yeo IY, Wong D, Koh AH, Wong TY, Aung T (2010) Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and neovascular age-related macular degeneration: same or different disease? Prog Retin Eye Res 29:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coscas F, Coscas G, Querques G, Massamba N, Querques L, Bandello F, Souied EH (2012) En face enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of fibrovascular pigment epithelium detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:4147–4151. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-9878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheung CM, Laude A, Wong W, Mathur R, Chan CM, Wong E, Wong D, Wong TY, Lim TH (2015) Improved specificity of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy diagnosis using a modified EVEREST criteria. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 35:1375–1380. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu R, Li J, Li Z, Yu S, Yang Y, Yan H, Zeng J, Tang S, Ding X (2016) Distinguishing polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy from typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration based on spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 36:778–786. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaikitmongkol V, Khunsongkiet P, Patikulsila D, Ratanasukon M, Watanachai N, Jumroendararasame C, Mayerle CB, Han IC, Chen CJ, Winaikosol P, Dejkriengkraikul C, Choovuthayakorn J, Kunavisarut P, Bressler NM (2018) Color fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescein angiography in diagnosing polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 192:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.05.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koh A, Lee WK, Chen LJ, Chen SJ, Hashad Y, Kim H, Lai TY, Pilz S, Ruamviboonsuk P, Tokaji E, Weisberger A, Lim TH (2012) EVEREST study: efficacy and safety of verteporfin photodynamic therapy in combination with ranibizumab or alone versus ranibizumab monotherapy in patients with symptomatic macular polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 32:1453–1464. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31824f91e8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jia Y, Tan O, Tokayer J, Potsaid B, Wang Y, Liu JJ, Kraus MF, Subhash H, Fujimoto JG, Hornegger J, Huang D (2012) Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 20:4710–4725. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.20.004710

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bradley PD, Sim DA, Keane PA, Cardoso J, Agrawal R, Tufail A, Egan CA (2016) The evaluation of diabetic macular ischemia using optical coherence tomography angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:626–631. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Srour M, Querques G, Semoun O, El Ameen A, Miere A, Sikorav A, Zambrowski O, Souied EH (2016) Optical coherence tomography angiography characteristics of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Srour M, Querques G, Souied EH (2016) Optical coherence tomography angiography of idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Dev Ophthalmol 56:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheung CM, Yanagi Y, Mohla A, Lee SY, Mathur R, Chan CM, Yeo I, Wong TY (2016) Characterization and differentiation of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy using swept source optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000001391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanaka K, Mori R, Kawamura A, Nakashizuka H, Wakatsuki Y, Yuzawa M (2017) Comparison of OCT angiography and indocyanine green angiographic findings with subtypes of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 101:51–55. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takayama K, Ito Y, Kaneko H, Kataoka K, Sugita T, Maruko R, Hattori K, Ra E, Haga F, Terasaki H (2017) Comparison of indocyanine green angiography and optical coherence tomographic angiography in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Eye (London, England) 31:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Inoue M, Balaratnasingam C, Freund KB (2015) Optical coherence tomography angiography of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and polypoidal choroidal neovascularization. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 35:2265–2274. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang M, Zhou Y, Gao SS, Liu W, Huang Y, Huang D, Jia Y (2016) Evaluating polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with optical coherence tomography angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:OCT526–OCT532. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18955

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Fukuyama H, Iwami H, Araki T, Ishikawa H, Ikeda N, Gomi F (2018) Indocyanine green dye filling time for Polypoidal lesions in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy affects the visibility of the lesions on OCT angiography. Ophthalmol Retina 2:803–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2017.11.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seong S, Choo HG, Kim YJ, Kim JY, Lee JH, Oh HS, You YS, Kim SH, Kwon OW (2019) Novel findings of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy via optical coherence tomography angiography. Korean J Ophthalmol 33:54–62. https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2018.0048

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheung CMG, Lai TYY, Ruamviboonsuk P, Chen SJ, Chen Y, Freund KB, Gomi F, Koh AH, Lee WK, Wong TY (2018) Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: definition, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Ophthalmology 125:708–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.11.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shin JY, Lee JM, Byeon SH (2015) Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor with or without pneumatic displacement for submacular hemorrhage. Am J Ophthalmol 159:904–914 e901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.01.024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Carlo TE, Bonini Filho MA, Chin AT, Adhi M, Ferrara D, Baumal CR, Witkin AJ, Reichel E, Duker JS, Waheed NK (2015) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography of choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmology 122(6):1228–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jia Y, Bailey ST, Wilson DJ, Tan O, Klein ML, Flaxel CJ, Potsaid B, Liu JJ, Lu CD, Kraus MF, Fujimoto JG, Huang D (2014) Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography of choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 121(7):1435–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang Y-M, Hsieh M-H, Li A-F, Chen S-J (2017) Sensitivity, specificity, and limitations of optical coherence tomography angiography in diagnosis of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. J Ophthalmol 2017:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cheung CMG, Yanagi Y, Akiba M, Tan A, Mathur R, Chan CM, Yeo I, Wong TY (2018) Improved detection and diagnosis of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy using a combination of optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000002228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuroiwa S, Tateiwa H, Hisatomi T, Ishibashi T, Yoshimura N (2004) Pathological features of surgically excised polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy membranes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 32(3):297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Puliafito CA (2014) OCT angiography: the next era of OCT technology emerges. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina 45(5):360–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all patients who participated in this study. The authors have full control of all primary data, and they agree to allow Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology to review their data upon request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoyan Ding.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University. All investigations followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the prospective study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhan, Z., Sun, L., Jin, C. et al. Comparison between non-visualized polyps and visualized polyps on optical coherence tomography angiography in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257, 2349–2356 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04445-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04445-5

Keywords

Navigation