Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ocular perfusion pressure control during pars plana vitrectomy: testing a novel device

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study the efficacy of a novel device intended to control infusion pressure based on mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP) during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

Methods

An arm blood pressure cuff connected to a vitrectomy machine calculated mean arterial pressure (MAP), while a pressure sensor close to the infusion trocar measured intraocular pressure (IOP). MOPP was calculated in real time in 36 consecutive patients undergoing PPV, who were divided into two groups. The device lowered IOP every time that calculated MOPP fell below 30 mmHg in the Control ON group (18 patients), while no action was taken in the Control OFF group (18 patients).

Results

Baseline IOP and blood pressure were similar between groups. The Control ON group had significantly lower average intraoperative IOP (30.5 ± 2.1 vs. 35.9 ± 6.9 mmHg; p = 0.002) and higher MOPP (56.4 ± 5.9 vs. 49.7 ± 6.1 mmHg) than the Control OFF group. The Control ON group also spent less time at MOPP < 10 mmHg and < 30 mmHg: 0 vs. 3.40 ± 2.38 min (p < 0.001) and 9.91 ± 7.15 vs. 16.13 ± 8.12 min (p = 0.02), respectively.

Conclusions

The MOPP control device effectively maintained lower IOP and higher MOPP throughout surgery. It also helped avoid dangerous IOP peaks and MOPP dips, allowing patients to spend less time at MOPP of < 10 and < 30 mmHg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caprioli J, Coleman AL (2011) Blood flow in glaucoma discussion. Blood pressure, perfusion pressure, and glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 149:704–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Quaranta L, Katsanos A, Russo A, Riva I (2013) 24-hour intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure in glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 58:26–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi J, Jeong J, Cho H-S, Kook MS (2011) Effect of nocturnal blood pressure reduction on circadian fluctuation of mean ocular perfusion pressure: a risk factor for normal tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:831–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu JHK, Gokhale PA, Loving RT et al (2003) Laboratory assessment of diurnal and nocturnal ocular perfusion pressures in humans. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 19:291–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Uchida A, Shinoda K, Matsumoto CS, Kawai M, Kawai S, Ohde H, Ozawa Y, Ishida S, Inoue M, Mizota A, Tsubota K (2012) Acute visual field defect following Vitrectomy determined to originate from optic nerve by electrophysiological tests. Case Rep Ophthalmol 3:396–405

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Taban M, Lewis H, Lee MS (2007) Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and ‘visual field defects’ following vitrectomy: could they be related? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:600–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jain N, McCuen BW 2nd, Mruthyunjaya P (2012) Unanticipated vision loss after pars plana vitrectomy. Surv Ophthalmol 57:91–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rossi T, Querzoli G, Angelini G, Rossi A, Malvasi C, Iossa M, Ripandelli G (2014) Ocular perfusion pressure during pars plana vitrectomy: a pilot study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:8497–8505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parel JM, Parrish RK 2nd, Nose I (1987) An intraoperative intraocular pressure monitor. Ophthalmic Surg 18:371–374

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Blumenthal M, Cahane M, Ashkenazi I (1992) Direct intraoperative continuous monitoring of intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Surg 23:132–134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gardner TW, Quillen DA, Blankenship GW, Marshall WK (1993) Intraocular pressure fluctuations during scleral buckling surgery. Ophthalmology 100:1050–1054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bansal AS, Hsu J, Garg SJ, Sivalingam A, Vander JF, Moster M, Maguire JI, Regillo CD (2012) Optic neuropathy after vitrectomy for retinal detachment: clinical features and analysis of risk factors. Ophthalmology 119:2364–2370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hayreh SS (2004) Posterior ischaemic optic neuropathy: clinical features, pathogenesis, and management. Eye (Lond) 18:1188–1206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Minami M, Oku H, Okuno T, Fukuhara M, Ikeda T (2007) High infusion pressure in conjunction with vitreous surgery alters the morphology and function of the retina of rabbits. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:633–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chu ER, Lee AW, Chen CS (2009) Resolution of visual field constriction with verapamil in a patient with bilateral optic neuropathy, migraine and Raynaud’s phenomenon. Intern Med J 39:851–853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M et al (2000) Vascular risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma: the Egna-Neumarkt study. Ophthalmology 107:1287–1293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Michelson G, Groh MJ, Langhans M (1996) Perfusion of the juxtapapillary retina and optic nerve head in acute ocular hypertension. Ger J Ophthalmol 5:315–321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Riva CE, Hero M, Titze P, Petrig B (1997) Autoregulation of human optic nerve head blood flow in response to acute changes in ocular perfusion pressure. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 235:618–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommaso Rossi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Giampiero Angelini and Alessandro Rossi are employees of Optikon 2000 S.p.A. All other authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licencing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rossi, T., Querzoli, G., Gelso, A. et al. Ocular perfusion pressure control during pars plana vitrectomy: testing a novel device. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255, 2325–2330 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3799-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3799-2

Keywords

Navigation