Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evolution of central corneal thickness in children with congenital glaucoma requiring glaucoma surgery

  • Glaucoma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The purpose of the study was to investigate the evolution of central corneal thickness (CCT) in correlation to the intraocular pressure (IOP) in children with congenital glaucoma before and after glaucoma surgery.

Methods

Nine eyes of five children (age 2 weeks to 6 months, mean 23 weeks) underwent trabeculotomy for congenital glaucoma. Corneal ultrasound pachymetry (PacScan 3000 AP, Technomed, Germany), tonometry using the Perkins tonometer, and slit-lamp examination (additionally to a clinical routine examination with retinoscopy, funduscopy, measurement of axial length and corneal diameter) were performed before and for at least 12 months after glaucoma surgery. In all children, corneal pachymetry and slit-lamp biomicroscopy—and whenever possible applanation tonometry—were performed without sedation or general anesthesia. If measurement of the IOP was not possible otherwise (in four of the five children), sedation with midazolam orally was used to measure the IOP at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months after trabeculotomy, then every 3 months.

Results

Six of nine eyes had biomicroscopically clear corneas without visible corneal edema before trabeculotomy. In three eyes, a corneal edema was visible in at least one quadrant of the cornea. Regarding all eyes together, mean CCT was 651 ± 138 μm before trabeculotomy; this decreased to 592 ± 119 μm within 2 weeks after trabeculotomy. At 6 weeks and 3 months there was a further regression to 569.4 ± 16 μm. Mean IOP was 18.6 ± 7.5 mmHg before and decreased to 14.8 ± 5.8 mmHg after glaucoma surgery. Regarding IOP data obtained under general anaesthesia, decrease of CCT was significantly correlated with decrease in IOP. There was no significant difference in the correlation between eyes with and without visible corneal edema.

Conclusions

Corneal ultrasound pachymetry appears to be a valuable additional measure in the follow-up of infants and small children requiring glaucoma surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dickens CJ, Hoskins HD (1996) Diagnosis and treatment of congenital glaucoma. In: Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T (eds) The glaucomas, 2nd edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 739–749

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jaafer MS (1988) Care of the infantile glaucoma patient. In: Reinecke RD (ed) Ophthalmology Annual. Raven, New York, pp 15–28

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lleo A, Marcos A, Calatayud M et al (2003) The relationship between central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Clin Exp Optom 86:104–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldmann H (1955) Un nouveau tonomètre d'applanation. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr 67:474–478

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldmann H, Schmidt Th (1957) Über Applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologica 134:221–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen KF, Ehlers N (1971) Elevated tonometer readings caused by a thick cornea. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh.) 49:775–778

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S (1975) Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta ophthalmol 53:34–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ehlers N, Hansen KF, Aasved H (1975) Biometric correlations of corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh.) 53:652–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Draeger J, Körner Ch, Lüders M (1982) Tonometrie mit unterschiedlichen Applanationsdurchmessern. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 120:458–460

    Google Scholar 

  10. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K (1993) The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 115:592–596

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Argus WA (1995) Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmology 102:1810–1812

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Herndon LW, Choudhri SA, Cox T, Damji KF, Shields MB, Allingham RR (1997) Central corneal thickness in normal, glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 115:1137–1141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Velten IM, Bergua A, Horn FK, Jünemann A, Korth M (2000). Central corneal thickness in normals, patients with ocular hypertension, low-tension glaucomas, and open-angle glaucomas - a clinical study. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 217:219–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J (2001) Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol 85:85–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pürsten A, Grein HJ, Pillunat LE (2006) Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 124:471–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Velten K, Günther M, Oberacher-Velten I, Lorenz B (2006) Finite element simulation of corneal applanation. Letter to the editor. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:1073–1074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hussein MA, Paysse EA, Bell NP, Coats DK, Brady McCreery KM, Koch DD, Orengo-Nania S, Baskin D, Wilhelmus KR (2004) Corneal thickness in children. Am J Ophthalmol 138:744–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sampaolesi R, Caruso R (1982) Ocular echometry in the diagnosis of congenital glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 100:574–577

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Henriques MJ, Vessani RM, Reis FAC, de Almeida GV, Betinjane AJ, Susanna RJ (2004) Corneal thickness in congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma 13:185–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tai TY, Mills MD, Beck AD, Joos KM, Ying GS, Liu C, Piltz-Seymour JR (2006) Central corneal thickness and corneal diameter in patients with childhood glaucoma. J Glaucoma 15:524–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jordan JF, Dietlein TS, Dinslage S, Krieglstein GK (2005) New aspects of corneal pachymetry in congenital glaucoma and pediatric aphakic glaucoma. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 222:883–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML (2000) Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measure: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44:367–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Muir KW, Jin J, Freedman SF (2004) Central corneal thickness and its relationship to intraocular pressure in children. Ophthalmology 111:2220–2223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Muir KW, Duncan L, Enyedi LB, Stinnett SS, Freedman SF (2006) Central corneal thickness in children: stability over time. Am J Ophthalmol 141:955–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Muir KW, Duncan L, Enyedi LB, Freedman SF (2006) Central corneal thickness in children: Racial differences (black vs white) and correlation with measured intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 15:520–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sator-Katzenschlager S, Deusch E, Dolezal S, Michalek-Sauberer A, Grubmüller R, Heinze G, Wedrich A (2002) Sevoflurane and propofol decrease intraocular pressure equally during non-ophthalmic surgery and recovery. Br J Anaesth 89:764–766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fragen RJ, Hauch T (1981) The effect of midazolam maleate and diazepam on intraocular pressure in adults. Arzneimittelforschung 31:2273–2275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Virkkila ME, Ali-Melkkila TM, Kanto JH (1992) Premedication for outpatient cataract surgery: a comparative study of intramuscular alfentanil, midazolam and placebo. ACTA Anaesthesiol Scan 36:559–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Carter K, Faberowski LK, Sherwood MB, Berman LS, McGorray S (1999) A randomized trial of the effect of midazolam on intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 8:204–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Birgit Lorenz

    Present address: Department of Ophthalmology, Universitaetsklinikum Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Giessen Campus, Friedrichstrasse 18, 35385, Giessen, Germany

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Paediatric Ophthalmology, Strabismology, and Ophthalmogenetics, University of Regensburg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany

    Isabel Oberacher-Velten & Birgit Lorenz

  2. Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Regensburg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany

    Christopher Prasser

Authors
  1. Isabel Oberacher-Velten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher Prasser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Birgit Lorenz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Oberacher-Velten.

Additional information

Financial interest: None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oberacher-Velten, I., Prasser, C. & Lorenz, B. Evolution of central corneal thickness in children with congenital glaucoma requiring glaucoma surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246, 397–403 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0690-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0690-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation