Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intraocular humidity immediately after fluid–air exchange in pars plana vitrectomy

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study vitreous cavity humidity during fluid–air exchange in pars plana vitrectomy.

Methods

Intraocular humidity in the vitreous cavity was recorded for 2 min in six artificial eyes, six enucleated pig eyes, and ten patient eyes, after the eyes had been filled with either humidified air (75% humidity) or dry air (8% humidity).

Results

In artificial eyes the humidity levelled off at a value that was approximately equal to the humidity of the infused air, i.e., a mean of 71.9% when humidified air was used and a mean of 14.4% when dry air was used. In enucleated pig eyes humidity increased slightly with humidified air and remained stable with dry air. In patients intraocular humidity increased to over 90%, regardless of whether humidified or dry air was used.

Conclusion

In the living eye, dry air deprives the retinal tissue of humidity, which is lost into the vitreous cavity. This effect can be reduced by using humidified air.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boldt HC, Munden PM, Folk JC, Mehaffey MG (1996) Visual field defects after macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 122:371–381

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brubaker RF (1991) Flow of aqueous humor in humans (The Friedenwald Lecture). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32:3145–3166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cullinane AB, Cleary PE (2000) Prevention of visual field defects after macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 84:372–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ezra E, Arden GB, Riordan-Eva P, Aylward GW, Gregor ZJ (1996) Visual field loss following vitrectomy for stage 2 and 3 macular holes. Br J Ophthalmol 80:519–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gass CA, Haritoglou C, Messmer EM, Schaumberger M, Kampik A (2001) Peripheral visual field defects after macular hole surgery: a complication with decreasing incidence. Br J Ophthalmol 85:549–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hasumura T, Yonemura N, Hirata A, Murata Y, Negi A (2000) Retinal damage by air infusion during vitrectomy in rabbit eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:4300–4304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirata A, Yonemura N, Hasumura T, Murata Y, Negi A (2000) Effect of infusion air pressure on visual field defects after macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 130:611–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hutton WL, Fuller DG, Snyder WB, Fellman RL, Swanson WH (1996) Visual field defects after macular hole surgery. Ophthalmology 103:2152–2159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerrison JB, Haller JA, Elman M, Miller NR (1996) Visual field loss following vitreous surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 114:564–569

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kokame GT (2000) Visual field defects after vitrectomy with fluid–air exchange. Am J Ophthalmol 130:653–654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kokame GT (2001) Visual field defects after vitrectomy with fluid–air exchange. Br J Ophthalmol 85:121–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee YW, Kwok AKH, Lan DSC (2000) Prevention of visual field defects after macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 84:1439–1441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Malinowski SM, Pesin SR (1997) Visual field loss caused by retinal vascular occlusion after vitrectomy surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 123:707–708

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Melberg NS, Thomas MA (1995) Visual field loss after pars plana vitrectomy with air/fluid exchange. Am J Ophthalmol 120:386–388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oh KT, Boldt HC, Maturi RK, Folk JC, Kardon RH (2000) Evaluation of patients with visual field defects following macular hole surgery using multifocal electroretinography. Retina 20:238–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohji M, Nao-i N, Saito Y, Hayashi A, Tano Y (1999) Prevention of visual field defect after macular hole surgery by passing air used for fluid–air exchange through water. Am J Ophthalmol 127:62–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Paques M, Massin P, Santiago PY, Spielmann AC, Gaudric A (1997) Visual field loss after vitrectomy for full thickness macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol 124:88–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pendergast SD, McCuen BW II (1996) Visual field loss after macular hole surgery. Ophthalmology 103:1069–1077

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vogel H, Gerthsen C (1997) Gerthsen Physik, vol. 19. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 110–114

    Google Scholar 

  20. Williams JM, Jacobson DM (1997) Visual field loss after vitreous surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 115:434–435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Welch JC (1997) Dehydration injury as a possible cause of visual field defect after pars plana vitrectomy for macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol 124:698–699

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yonemura N, Hirata A, Hasumura T, Negi A (2001) Fundus changes corresponding to visual defects after vitrectomy for macular hole. Ophthalmology 108:1638–1643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Eter.

Additional information

The authors have no proprietary interest in any part of the study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eter, N., Brinken, R., Garbe, S. et al. Intraocular humidity immediately after fluid–air exchange in pars plana vitrectomy. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmo 244, 305–308 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-1168-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-1168-z

Keywords

Navigation