Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Longitudinal and cross-sectional study of patients with early-onset severe retinal dystrophy associated with RPE65 mutations

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To quantify retinal function longitudinally and cross-sectionally in patients with autosomal-recessive early-onset severe retinal dystrophy (EOSRD) associated with RPE65 mutations.

Subjects and methods

The ocular phenotype was characterized in four children from three families up to the second decade of life, and in three siblings from one family aged 43–54 years carrying compound heterozygous or homozygous mutations in RPE65. Standard clinical examination included colour vision testing, fundus photography and Goldmann visual fields (GVF). Full-field ERGs (in all) and multifocal ERGs (in two patients) were also recorded. Visual performance and fundus appearance were compared to literature data.

Results

In childhood, visual acuity (VA) ranged from 0.1 to 0.3, and GVF for target V4 was well preserved. VA and GVF were measurable in only one of the three adult siblings. Nystagmus was present in two of four children and two of three adults. Photophobia was absent in childhood and developed in adulthood. Funduscopic changes were discrete during the first decade of life in three of four children; one patient had clear macular changes already at age 5 years. All three adult siblings had distinct retinal changes including the macula. Bone spicules were not a feature. Residual colour vision was present in all patients with measurable VA. Rod ERGs were absent at any age; cone ERGs were detectable in early childhood. To date, VA data have been reported in 51 patients, visual fields in 29 patients, and a detailed fundus description in 34 patients. For all three parameters, data were comparable to the results in our patient cohort.

Conclusion

In childhood, patients with RPE65 mutations have better visual functions than typically seen in Leber congenital amaurosis. The phenotype shows a common progressive pattern with intrafamilial and interfamilial variation. The data suggest a preserved retinal morphology at young ages, arguing for vision-restoring gene therapy trials in childhood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acland GM, Aguirre GD, Ray J et al (2001) Gene therapy restores vision in a canine model of childhood blindness. Nat Genet 28:92–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Al Khayer K, Hagstrom S, Pauer G, Zegarra H, Sears J, Traboulsi EI (2004) Thirty-year follow-up of a patient with leber congenital amaurosis and novel RPE65 mutations. Am J Ophthalmol 137:375–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Asman P, Olsson J (1995) Physiology of cumulative defect curves: consequences in glaucoma perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 73:197–201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dharmaraj S, Li Y, Robitaille JM et al (2000) A novel locus for Leber congenital amaurosis maps to chromosome 6q. Am J Hum Genet 66:319–326

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards A, Fishman GA, Anderson RJ, Grover S, Derlacki DJ (1998) Visual acuity and visual field impairment in Usher syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 116:165–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Felius J, Thompson DA, Khan NW et al (2002) Clinical course and visual function in a family with mutations in the RPE65 gene. Arch Ophthalmol 120:55–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerth C, Andrassi-Darida M, Bock M, Preising MN, Weber BH, Lorenz B (2002) Phenotypes of 16 Stargardt macular dystrophy/fundus flavimaculatus patients with known ABCA4 mutations and evaluation of genotype–phenotype correlation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:628–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grover S, Fishman GA, Brown J Jr (1997) Frequency of optic disc or parapapillary nerve fiber layer drusen in retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology 104:295–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grover S, Fishman GA, Brown J Jr (1998) Patterns of visual field progression in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology 105:1069–1075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gu S, Thompson DA, Srisailapathy Srikumari CR et al (1997) Mutations in RPE65 cause autosomal recessive childhood-onset severe retinal dystrophy. Nat Genet 17:194–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamel CP, Jenkins NA, Gilbert DJ, Copeland NG, Redmond TM (1994) The gene for the retinal pigment epithelium-specific protein RPE65 is localized to human 1p31 and mouse 3. Genomics 20:509–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamel CP, Griffoin JM, Lasquellec L, Bazalgette C, Arnaud B (2001) Retinal dystrophies caused by mutations in RPE65: assessment of visual functions. Br J Ophthalmol 85:424–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heckenlively JR (1988) Retinitis pigmentosa. Lippinscott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Hooser JP, Aleman TS, He YG et al (2000) Rapid restoration of visual pigment and function with oral retinoid in a mouse model of childhood blindness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:8623–8628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Hooser JP, Liang Y, Maeda T et al (2002) Recovery of visual functions in mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis. J Biol Chem 277:19173–19182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lorenz B, Gyürüs P, Preising M et al (2000) Early-onset severe rod–cone dystrophy in young children with RPE65 mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2735–2742

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lorenz B, Wabbels B, Wegscheider E, Hamel CP, Drexler W, Preising MN (2004) Lack of fundus autofluorescence to 488 nm from childhood on in patients with early onset severe retinal dystrophy (EOSRD) associated with mutations in RPE65. Ophthalmology 111:1585–1594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lotery AJ, Namperumalsamy P, Jacobson SG et al (2000) Mutation analysis of 3 genes in patients with leber congenital amaurosis. Arch Ophthalmol 118:538–543

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marlhens F, Bareil C, Griffoin JM et al (1997) Mutations in RPE65 cause Leber’s congenital amaurosis. Nat Genet 17:139–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marlhens F, Griffoin JM, Bareil C, Arnaud B, Claustres M, Hamel CP (1998) Autosomal recessive retinal dystrophy associated with two novel mutations in the RPE65 gene. Eur J Hum Genet 6:527–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marmor MF, Zrenner E (1999) Standard for clinical electroretinography (1998 update). Doc Ophthalmol 97:143–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moiseyev G, Crouch RK, Goletz P, Oatis J Jr, Redmond TM, Ma JX (2003) Retinyl esters are the substrate for isomerohydrolase. Biochemistry 42:2229–2238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morimura H, Fishman GA, Grover SA, Fulton AB, Berson EL, Dryja TP (1998) Mutations in the RPE65 gene in patients with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa or Leber congenital amaurosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:3088–3093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Myers VS, Gidlewski N, Quinn GE, Miller D, Dobson V (1999) Distance and near visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and visual fields of 10-year-old children. Arch Ophthalmol 117:94–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Narfström K (1999) Retinal dystrophy or ‘congenital stationary night blindness’ in the Briard dog. Vet Ophthalmol 2:75–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Narfström K, Wrigstad A, Nilsson SE (1989) The Briard dog: a new animal model of congenital stationary night blindness. Br J Ophthalmol 73:750–756

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Narfström K, Katz ML, Bragadottir R et al (2003) Functional and structural recovery of the retina after gene therapy in the RPE65 null mutation dog. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:1663–1672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Perrault I, Rozet JM, Ghazi I et al (1999) Different functional outcome of RetGC1 and RPE65 gene mutations in Leber congenital amaurosis. Am J Hum Genet 64:1225–1228

    Google Scholar 

  29. Poehner WJ, Fossarello M, Rapoport AL et al (2000) A homozygous deletion in RPE65 in a small Sardinian family with autosomal recessive retinal dystrophy. Mol Vis 6:192–198

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Quinn GE, Miller DL, Evans JA, Tasman WE, McNamara JA, Schaffer DB (1996) Measurement of Goldmann visual fields in older children who received cryotherapy as infants for threshold retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol 114:425–428

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Redmond TM, Yu S, Lee E et al (1998) Rpe65 is necessary for production of 11-cis-vitamin A in the retinal visual cycle. Nat Genet 20:344–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Seeliger MW, Grimm C, Stahlberg F et al (2001) New views on RPE65 deficiency: the rod system is the source of vision in a mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis. Nat Genet 29:70–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Simovich MJ, Miller B, Ezzeldin H et al (2001) Four novel mutations in the RPE65 gene in patients with Leber congenital amaurosis. Hum Mutat 18:164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sitorus RS, Lorenz B, Preising MN (2003) Analysis of three genes in Leber congenital amaurosis in Indonesian patients. Vision Res 43:3087–3093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Thompson DA, Gyürüs P, Fleischer LL et al (2000) Genetics and phenotypes of rpe65 mutations in inherited retinal degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:4293–4299

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Veske A, Nilsson SE, Narfström K, Gal A (1999) Retinal dystrophy of Swedish Briard/Briard-beagle dogs is due to a 4-bp deletion in RPE65. Genomics 57:57–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yzer S, van den Born LI, Schuil J et al (2003) A Tyr368His RPE65 founder mutation is associated with variable expression and progression of early onset retinal dystrophy in 10 families of a genetically isolated population. J Med Genet 40:709–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG Lo 457/3-1-3, Lo 457/5-1), the ReForM programme of the Medical Faculty of the University of Regensburg, Germany, and Pro Retina e.V. Deutschland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Paediatric Ophthalmology, Strabismology and Ophthalmogenetics, University of Regensburg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany

    Karina Paunescu, Bettina Wabbels, Markus N. Preising & Birgit Lorenz

Authors
  1. Karina Paunescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bettina Wabbels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Markus N. Preising
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Birgit Lorenz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birgit Lorenz.

Additional information

Nucleotide counting in this paper differs from some previous reports since it was adjusted to start from the adenine of the first methionine codon and follows the reference sequence at http://www.retina-internatinal.org/sci-news/rpe65seq.doc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paunescu, K., Wabbels, B., Preising, M.N. et al. Longitudinal and cross-sectional study of patients with early-onset severe retinal dystrophy associated with RPE65 mutations. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243, 417–426 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1020-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1020-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation