Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inter- and intra-observer variability in grading lesions of age-related maculopathy and macular degeneration

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose.

To introduce a revised version of the grading system established by the International ARM Epidemiological Study Group for identifying and quantifying abnormalities of age-related maculopathy (ARM) and age-related degeneration (AMD) and to investigate its reliability, specifically the inter- and intra-observer variability.

Methods.

Fifty eyes of 25 patients with ARM or AMD in at least one eye were randomly selected from a large ongoing collection of clinical data and DNA in a tertiary referral UK population. Stereoscopic color fundus photographs were taken with a 30° fundus camera and were centered on the macula. Presence and severity of fundus abnormalities in ARM and AMD were graded using a grid to define macular subfields and standard circles to define the size of lesions. Inter-observer variability was assessed by having three retinal specialists evaluate the color slides and intra-observer variability by re-grading the same set.

Results.

The inter-observer agreement for all subfields was fair to substantial for small hard drusen (70–89%; κ=0.26–0.63) and intermediate soft drusen (76–94%; κ=0.27–0.69). Agreement ranged between 87% and 100%, between 50% and 92%, and between 78% and 100% for larger drusen, the presence of hyperpigmentation, and the presence of hypopigmentation, respectively. Agreement was moderate to almost perfect for the presence of geographic atrophy (88–98%; κ=0.60–0.95) and substantial to almost perfect for the presence of choroidal neovascularization (84–100%; κ=0.62–1.00). The intra-observer variability for the grading of drusen characteristics and pigmentary changes was similar in magnitude, but slightly greater for features of advanced AMD.

Conclusion.

Reproducibility was achieved using a revised version of the grading system established by the International ARM Epidemiological Study Group. This grading system may therefore be used for phenotyping of ARM and AMD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allikmets R, Shroyer NF, Singh N, Seddon JM, Lewis RA, Bernstein PS, Peiffer A, Zabriskie NA, Li Y, Hutchinson A, Dean M, Lupski JR, Leppert M (1997) Mutation of the Stargardt disease gene (ABCR) in age-related macular degeneration. Science 277:1805–1807

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bird AC, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Chisholm IH, Coscas G, Davis MD, de Jong PT, Klaver CC, Klein BE, Klein R, et al (1995) An international classification and grading system for age-related maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration. The International ARM Epidemiological Study Group. Surv Ophthalmol 39:367–374

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brennan P, Silman A (1992) Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ 304:1491–1494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dosso AA, Bovet J (1992) Monozygotic twin brothers with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmologica 205:24–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hammond CJ, Webster AR, Snieder H, Bird AC, Gilbert CE, Spector TD (2002) Genetic influence on early age-related maculopathy. A twin study. Ophthalmology 109:730–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heiba IM, Elston RC, Klein BE, Klein R (1994) Sibling correlations and segregation analysis of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Genet Epidemiol 11:51–67

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyman LG, Lilienfeld AM, Ferris FL, Fine SL (1983) Senile macular degeneration: a case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 118:213–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klaver CC, Wolfs RC, Assink JJ, van Duijn CM, Hofman A, de Jong PT (1998) Genetic risk of age-related maculopathy. Population-based familial aggregation study. Arch Ophthalmol 116:1646–1651

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Klein ML, Mauldin WM, Stoumbos VD (1994) Heredity and age-related macular degeneration. Observations in monozygotic twins. Arch Ophthalmol 112:932–937

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Klein R, Davis MD, Magli YL, Segal P, Klein BE, Hubbard L (1991) The Wisconsin age-related maculopathy grading system. Ophthalmology 98:1128–1134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Knobloch WH, Leavenworth NM, Bouchard TJ, Eckert ED (1985) Eye findings in twins reared apart. Ophthalmic Paediatr Genet 5:59–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Melrose MA, Magargal LE, Lucier AC (1985) Identical twins with subretinal neovascularization complicating senile macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Surg 16:648–651

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meyers SM (1994) A twin study on age-related macular degeneration. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 92:775–843

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyers SM, Zachary AA (1988) Monozygotic twins with age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 106:651–653

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Piguet B, Wells JA, Palmvang IB, Wormald R, Chisholm IH, Bird AC (1993) Age-related Bruch's membrane change: a clinical study of the relative role of heredity and environment. Br J Ophthalmol 77:400–403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rivera A, White K, Stohr H, Steiner K, Hemmrich N, Grimm T, Jurklies B, Lorenz B, Scholl HPN, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Weber BH (2000) A comprehensive survey of sequence variation in the ABCA4 (ABCR) gene in Stargardt disease and age-related macular degeneration. Am J Hum Genet 67:800–813

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seddon JM, Ajani UA, Mitchell BD (1997) Familial aggregation of age-related maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 123:199–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Silvestri G, Johnston PB, Hughes AE (1994) Is genetic predisposition an important risk factor in age-related macular degeneration? Eye 8:564–568

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stone EM, Webster AR, Vandenburgh K, Streb LM, Hockey RR, Lotery AJ, Sheffield VC (1998) Allelic variation in ABCR associated with Stargardt disease but not age-related macular degeneration. Nat Genet 20:328–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group (2001) The Age-Related Eye Disease Study system for classifying age-related macular degeneration from stereoscopic color fundus photographs: the Age-Related Eye Disease Study Report Number 6. Am J Ophthalmol 132:668–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson WD, Walter SD (1988) A reappraisal of the kappa coefficient. J Clin Epidemiol 41:949–958

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yates JR, Moore AT (2000) Genetic susceptibility to age related macular degeneration. J Med Genet 37:83–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements.

We thank Andrew Webster for general support and Nicola Harris for data input. This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grant SCHO 734/1-1 to H.P.N.S., a grant from Friends of Moorfields to T.P., and grants from the Medical Research Council (no. G000682) and the Foundation for Fighting Blindness to S.D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hendrik P. N. Scholl.

Additional information

Parts of this study were presented at the 100th annual meeting of the Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft, 26–29 September 2002 in Berlin (no. DO.01.18)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scholl, H.P.N., Peto, T., Dandekar, S. et al. Inter- and intra-observer variability in grading lesions of age-related maculopathy and macular degeneration. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 241, 39–47 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-002-0602-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-002-0602-8

Keywords

Navigation