Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Absence of MxA induction is related to a poor clinical response to interferon beta treatment in multiple sclerosis patients

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate whether induction of myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) mRNA after 3 months of interferon-β administration is related to the treatment response in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. In this prospective study, MS patients were enrolled before starting treatment. Demographic, clinical and radiological variables were recorded. Blood samples were obtained before, and at 3 and 12 months after interferon-β treatment. Real-time PCR was used to analyze MxA mRNA expression. Patients were classified as MxA-low or -high depending on MxA levels at baseline, and as MxA-induced or -non-induced according to whether an increase in MxA expression was detected at month 3. Time to the next relapse was investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. One hundred and four patients were selected and followed for a median of 2.2 years (IQR 1.6–3.5). On Cox regression analysis, a higher EDSS score before treatment (HR 1.57; 95 % CI 1.02–2.40; p = 0.039), MxA-high status at baseline (HR 2.71; 95 % CI 1.26–5.81; p = 0.010), and MxA-non-induced at month 3 (HR 2.49; 95 % CI 1.08–5.68; p = 0.031), were predictors of poor response to interferon-β in naïve MS patients. Patients showing a lower capacity for MxA induction following 3 months of interferon-β treatment are more likely to be non-responders to this therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (1993) Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. I. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Neurology 43:655–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobs LD, Cookfair DL, Rudick RA et al (1996) Intramuscular interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 39:285–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. PRIMS (Prevention of Relapses and Disability by Interferon beta-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis) Study Group (1998) Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of interferon beta-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis. Lancet 352:1498–1504

  4. PRISMS (Prevention of Relapses and Disability by Interferon-β-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis) Study Group and the University of British Columbia MS/MRI Analysis Group (2001) PRISMS-4: long-term efficacy of interferon-β-1a in relapsing MS. Neurology 56:1628–1636

  5. Río J, Nos C, Tintoré M et al (2002) Assessment of different treatment failure criteria in a cohort of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon beta: implications for clinical trials. Ann Neurol 52:400–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rudick RA, Lee JC, Simon J et al (2004) Defining interferon beta response status in multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol 56:548–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Malucchi S, Gili F, Caldano M et al (2008) Predictive markers for response to interferon therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 70:1119–1127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilli F, Marnetto F, Caldano M et al (2006) Biological markers of interferon-beta therapy: comparison among interferon-stimulated genes MxA, TRAIL and XAF-1. Mult Scler 12:47–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hesse D, Sellebjerg F, Sorensen PS (2009) Absence of MxA induction by interferon beta in patients with MS reflects complete loss of bioactivity. Neurology 73:372–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sottini A, Capra R, Serana F et al (2009) Interferon-Beta therapy monitoring in multiple sclerosis patients. Edcr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 9:14–28

  11. Deisenhammer F, Reindl M, Harvey J et al (1999) Bioavailability of interferon beta 1b in MS patients with and without neutralizing antibodies. Neurology 52:1239–1243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matas E, Bau L, Martínez-Iniesta M et al (2014) Baseline MxA mRNA expression predicts interferon beta response in multiple sclerosis patients. PLoS One 9(11):e112758. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112758

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G et al (2005) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 58:840–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Confavreux C, Compston DA, Hommes OR et al (1992) EDMUS, a European database for multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:671–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Schumacher GA, Beebe G, Kibler RF et al (1965) Problems of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis: report by the panel on the evaluation of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 122:552–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bertolotto A, Malucchi S, Sala A et al (2002) Differential effects of three interferon betas on neutralising antibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis: a follow up study in an independent laboratory. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:148–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Antonelli G, Bagnato F, Pozzilli C et al (1998) Development of neutralizing antibodies in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with IFN-beta1a. J Interferon Cytokine Res 18:345–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gilli F, Marnetto F, Caldano M et al (2005) Biological responsiveness to first injections of interferon-beta in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 158:195–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bertolotto A, Gilli F, Sala A et al (2001) Evaluation of bioavailability of three types of IFNb in multiple sclerosis patients by a new quantitative-competitive-PCR method for MxA quantification. J Immunol Methods 256:141–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Malucchi S, Gilli F, Caldano M et al (2011) One-year evaluation of factors affecting the biological activity of interferon beta in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol 258:895–903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sominada A, Hillert J (2008) Fogdell-Hahn. In vivo bioactivity of interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis patients with neutralizing antibodies is titre-dependent. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Romeoa M, Martinelli-Boneschib F, Rodeghera M et al (2013) Clinical and MRI predictors of response to interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Eur J Neurol 20:1060–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mezei Z, Bereczki D, Racz L et al (2012) Can a physician predict the clinical response to first-line immunomodulatory treatment in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis? Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 8:465–473

  25. Sá MJ, de Sá J, Sousa L (2014) Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: patterns of response to disease-modifying therapies and associated factors: a national survey. Neurol Ther 3(2):89–99. doi:10.1007/s40120-014-0019-4 (eCollection 2014)

  26. Comabella M, Lünemann JD, Rio J et al (2009) A type I interferon signature in monocytes is associated with poor response to interferon-B in multiple sclerosis. Brain 132:3353–3365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. van Baarsen L, Vosslamber S, Tijssen M et al (2008) Pharmacogenomics of interferon-B therapy in multiple sclerosis: baseline IFN signature determines pharmacological differences between patients. PLoS One 3(4):e1927. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001927

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Axtell RC, de Jong BA, Boniface K et al (2010) T helper type I and 17 cells determine efficacy of interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis and experimental encephalomyelitis. Nat Med 16:406–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hundeshagen A, Hecker M, Paap BK et al (2012) Elevated type I interferon-like activity in a subset of multiple sclerosis patients: molecular basis and clinical relevance. J Neuroinflamm 9:140. doi:10.1186/1742-2094-9-140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Serana F, Imberti L, Amato MP et al (2014) MxA mRNA quantification and disability progression in interferon beta-treated multiple sclerosis patients. PLoS One 9(4):e94794. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094794

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Garcia-Montojo M, De Las Heras V, Bartolome M et al (2007) Interferon beta treatment: bioavailability and antiviral activity in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurovirol 13:504–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis study group and the (1996) University of British Columbia MS/MRI analysis group. Neutralizing antibodies during treatment of multiple sclerosis with interferon beta-1b: experience during the first three years. Neurology 47:889–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Malucchi S, Sala A, Gilli F et al (2004) Neutralizing antibodies reduce the efficacy of βIFN during treatment of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 62:2031–2037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sorensen PS, Ross C, Clemmesen KM et al (2003) Clinical importance of neutralising antibodies against interferon-beta in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Lancet 362:1184–1191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sominanda A, Rot U, Suoniemi M et al (2007) Interferon beta preparations for the treatment of multiple sclerosis patients differ in neutralizing antibody seroprevalence and immunogenicity. Mult Scler 13:208–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Txomin Arbizu for his support in the development of the study, Ana M. González, Nuria Iranzo, Isabel León, M. Teresa Anguix, Silvia Macho and Mireya Bures for their nursing assistance, Gemma Aiza and Nadia García for their laboratory support, Susana Pobla for her administrative support and all patients for their invaluable participation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabet Matas.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

E Matas, L. Bau, L. Romero-Pinel, MA. Mañé-Martínez and S. Martínez-Yélamos received research support, funding for travel and congress expenses and honoraria from speaking engagements from Biogen Idec, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and Merck Serono. M. Martínez-Iniesta reports no disclosures.

Ethical standard

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, and written informed consent to participate was obtained from each patient and control.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Convenio de Investigación. Dep. de Salut. Generalitat de Catalunya (352/05).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matas, E., Bau, L., Martínez-Iniesta, M. et al. Absence of MxA induction is related to a poor clinical response to interferon beta treatment in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol 263, 722–729 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8053-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8053-z

Keywords

Navigation