Skip to main content
Log in

The prevalence and characteristics of patients with classic locked-in syndrome in Dutch nursing homes

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To establish the point prevalence and characteristics of patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS), particularly of the classic type, residing in Dutch nursing homes, a cross-sectional survey of Dutch nursing homes was conducted. The classic form of LIS was defined according to the criteria of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (1995). All Dutch long-term care organisations (n = 187) were asked if they had any patients with classic LIS as of December 5, 2011. The treating Elderly Care Physicians were then contacted to provide patient characteristics. Of all organisations, 91.4 % responded, and 11 organisations reported a total of 12 patients. After analysing the questionnaires, it was determined that ten patients had LIS, and two patients were characterised with vegetative state. Only two patients met the criteria for classic LIS, while six patients showed partial LIS. One of these patients was admitted to the nursing home after December 5, 2011, and was therefore, excluded. LIS without accompanying pontine lesion was observed in the remaining two patients. For the first time, the prevalence of classic LIS has been established at 0.7/10,000 somatic nursing home beds in all Dutch long-term care organisations. Possible explanations for this low prevalence could be the Dutch provision of home care or the influence of end-of-life decisions, such as euthanasia and withholding or withdrawing all medical treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration. These alternate outcomes should be explored in further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Plum F, Posner JB (1983) The Diagnosis of stupor and coma. FA Davis, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (1995) Recommendations for use of uniform nomenclature pertinent to patients with severe alterations of consciousness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76:205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer G, Gerstenbrand F, Rumpl E (1979) Varieties of locked-in syndrome. J Neurol 221:77–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Patterson JR, Grabois M (1986) Locked-In Syndrome: a review of 139 cases. Stroke 17(4):758–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chia LG (1991) Locked-in syndrome with bilateral ventral midbrain infarcts. Neurology 41:445–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Laureys S, Pellas F, Van Eeckhout P et al (2005) The locked-in syndrome: what is like to be conscious but paralyzed and voiceless? Prog Brain Res 150:495–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. León-Carrión J, Van Eeckhout P, Domínguez-Morales Mdel R, Pérez-Santamaría FJ (2002) The locked-in syndrome: a syndrome looking for a therapy. Brain Inj 16(7):571–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang B, Morariu MA (1979) Transient traumatic locked-in syndrome. Eur Neurol 18(6):391–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Landi A, Fornezza U, De Luca G, Marchi M, Colombo F (1994) Brain stem and motor-evoked responses in “locked-in” syndrome. J Neurosurg Sci 38(2):123–127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cherington M, Stears J, Hodges J (1976) Locked-in syndrome caused by a tumor. Neurology 26(2):180–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Messert B, Orrison WW, Hawkins MJ, Quaglieri CE (1979) Central pontine myelinolysis. Considerations on etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Neurology 29(2):147–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Murphy MJ, Brenton DW, Aschenbrener CA, Van Gilder JC (1979) Locked-in syndrome caused by a solitary pontine abscess. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 42(11):1062–1065

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sedney CL, Coger BR, Bailes JE (2011) Posterior fossa subdural hematoma resulting in locked-in syndrome: case report. Neurosurgery 69(2):E497–E500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nadour W, Goldwasser B, Biederman RW, Taffe K (2008) Silent aortic dissection presenting as transient locked-in syndrome. Tex Heart Inst J 35(3):359–361

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thielen N, Merkies ISJ (2004) Reversibel ‘locked-in’ syndroom door centrale pontiene en extrapontiene myelinolyse [Reversible ‘locked in’ syndrome by central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis]. Tijdschr Neurol Neurochir 105(6):273–278

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richard I, Pereon Y, Guiheneu P, Nogues B, Perrouin-Verbe B, Mathe JF (1995) Persistence of distal motor control in the locked-in syndrome. Review of 11 patients. Paraplegia 33:640–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith E, Delargy M (2005) Locked-in syndrome. BMJ 330(19):406–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Palmieri RL (2009) Unlocking the secrets of locked-in syndrome. Nursing 39(7):22–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. León-Carrión J, Van Eeckhout P, Domínguez-Morales Mdel R (2002) The locked-in syndrome: a syndrome looking for a therapy. Brain Inj 16(7):555–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bassetti C, Mathis J, Hess CW (1994) Multimodal electrophysiological studies including motor evoked potentials in patients with locked-in syndrome: report of six patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57:1403–1406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Babiloni C, Pistoia F, Sarà M et al (2010) Resting state eyes-closed cortical rhythms in patients with locked-in-syndrome: an EEG study. Clin Neurophysiol 121(11):1816–1824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Levy DE, Sidtis JJ, Rottenberg DA et al (1987) Differences in cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in vegetative versus locked-in patients. Ann Neurol 22:673–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Laureys S, Van Eeckhout P, Ferring M et al (2003) Brain function in acute and chronic locked-in syndrome. Presented at the 9th annual Meeting of the Organisation for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM), June 18-22, NY, USA, NeuroImage CD ROM Vol 19(2), Supplement 1

  24. Thibaut A, Bruno M-A, Chatelle C et al (2012) Metabolic activity in external and internal awareness networks in severely brain-damaged patients. J Rehabil Med 44:487–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hawkes CH (1974) “Locked-in” syndrome: report of seven cases. Br Med J 4(5941):379–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Faymonville M-E, Pantke K-H, Berré J (2004) Zerebrale Funktionen bei hirngeschädigten Patienten. Was bedeuten Koma, “vegetative-state”, “minimally conscious state”, “Locked-in-Syndrom” und Hirntod? Anaesthesist 53:1195–1202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F et al (2010) Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Medicine 8:68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N et al (2002) The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58(3):349–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bruno M-A, Majerus S, Boly M et al (2012) Functional neuroanatomy underlying the clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state patients. J Neurol 259:1087–1098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Casanova E, Lazzari RE, Lotta S, Mazzucchi A (2003) Locked-in syndrome: improvement in the prognosis after an early intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(6):862–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Doble JE, Haig AJ, Anderson C, Katz R (2003) Impairment, activity, participation, life satisfaction, and survival in persons with locked-in syndrome for over a decade follow up on a previously reported cohort. J Head Trauma Rehabil 18(5):435–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Statistics Netherlands. www.cbs.nl, Den Haag/Heerlen: CBS 2010

  33. Dutch Healthcare Authority. www.nza.nl, Utrecht: NZa 2006

  34. Koopmans RT, Lavrijsen JC, Hoek JF, Went PB, Schols JM (2010) Dutch elderly care physician: a new generation of nursing home physician specialists. J Am Geriatr Soc 58(9):1807–1809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Haig AJ, Katz RT, Sahgal V (1987) Mortality and complications of the locked-in syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68(1):24–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Katz RT, Haig AJ, Clark BB, DiPaolo RJ (1992) Long-term survival, prognosis, and life-care planning for 29 patients with chronic locked-in syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73(5):403–408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hufnagel A, Hammers A, Schönle PW, Böhm KD, Leonhardt G (1999) Stroke following chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine. J Neurol 246(8):683–688

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Povlsen UJ, Kjaer L, Arlien-Søborg P (1987) Locked-in syndrome following cervical manipulation. Acta Neurol Scand 76(6):486–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Horn SH (1983) The “locked-in” syndrome following chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine. Ann Emerg Med 12:648–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pamela F, Beaugerie L, Couturier M (1983) Locked-in syndrome caused by thrombosis of the basilar trunk after spinal manipulation. Presse Med 12(24):1548

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Klougart N, Leboeuf-Yde C, Rasmussen LR (1996) Safety in chiropractic practice, Part I; The occurrence of cerebrovascular accidents after manipulation to the neck in Denmark from 1978–1988. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 19(6):371–377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Rothwell DM, Bondy SJ, Williams JI (2001) Chiropractic manipulation and stroke: a population-based case-control study; editorial comment: a population-based case-control study. Stroke 32(5):1054–1060

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Keme-Ebi IK, Asindi AA (2008) Locked-in syndrome in a Nigerian male with Multiple Sclerosis: a case report and literature review. Pan Afr Med J 1:4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Central Government: personal budget (Persoonsgebonden Budget). www.rijksoverheid.nl

  45. Lavrijsen JCM, Van den Bosch JSG, Koopmans RCTM, Van Weel C (2005) Prevalence and characteristics of patients in a vegetative state in Dutch nursing homes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1420–1424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ethics and Humanities Subcommittee of the AAN (1993) Position statement: certain aspects of the care and management of profoundly and irreversibly paralyzed patients with retained consciousness and cognition. Report of the ethics and humanities subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 43:222–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bruno M-A, Bernheim JL, Ledoux D, Pellas F, Demertzi A, Laureys S (2011) A survey on self-assessed well-being in a cohort of chronic locked-in syndrome patients: happy majority, miserable minority. BMJ Open 1:e000039. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2010-000039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Central Goverment: Euthanasia Act (Euthanasiewet). www.rijksoverheid.nl, 2002

  49. Kmietowicz Z (2012) Man with locked-in syndrome who fought for doctors to end his life has died. BMJ 345:e5729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Julian Schnabel (2007) The diving bell and the butterfly. Pathé

  51. Bauby Jean-Dominique (1997) The diving bell and the butterfly (Le Scaphandre et le Papillon). KNOPF, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all of the Elderly Care Physicians and patients who participated in this study.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

This study has been approved by the local ethics committee and has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. F. Kohnen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kohnen, R.F., Lavrijsen, J.C.M., Bor, J.H.J. et al. The prevalence and characteristics of patients with classic locked-in syndrome in Dutch nursing homes. J Neurol 260, 1527–1534 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6821-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6821-y

Keywords

Navigation