Skip to main content
Log in

Impaired facilitation of motor evoked potentials in incomplete spinal cord injury

  • ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To improve the diagnosis of damaged spinal motor pathways in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) by assessing the facilitation of lower limbs motor evoked potentials (MEP).

Methods

Control subjects (n = 12) and iSCI patients (n = 21) performed static and dynamic isometric foot dorsiflexions. MEPs induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation and EMG background of tibialis anterior muscle (TA) were analyzed. Static and dynamic muscle activation was performed at comparable levels of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). The influence of the motor tasks on the excitability and facilitation of MEPs was compared between controls and iSCI patients.

Results

In the controls an increased facilitation of TA MEP at lower levels of dynamic compared with static activation (10–20% MVC) could be shown. At matched EMG background level the MEP responses were significantly increased. In the iSCI patients at a comparable level of TA activation the MEP responses were significantly reduced and 3 different patterns of MEP responses could be distinguished: i) preserved increment of TA MEP in the dynamic motor task, ii) unchanged MEP size in the dynamic and static motor task, and iii) elicitable MEPs in the dynamic motor task,which were abolished in the static motor task.

Conclusions

Static and dynamic motor tasks have different effects on TA MEP facilitation. The task–dependent modulation of TA MEPs is comparable to that described for upper limb muscles. Complementary to the MEP delay this approach allows for an estimation of the severity of spinal tract damage. The task–dependent modulation of TA MEPs is an additional diagnostic tool to improve the assessment and monitoring of motor function in iSCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aranyi Z, Mathis J, Hess CW, Rosler KM (1998) Task–dependent facilitation of motor evoked potentials during dynamic and steady muscle contractions. Muscle Nerve 21(10):1309–1316

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bawa P, Chalmers GR, Stewart H, Eisen AA (2002) Responses of ankle extensor and flexor motoneurones to transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurophysiol 88(1):124–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brouwer B, Ashby P, Midroni G (1989) Excitability of corticospinal neurons during tonic muscle contractions in man. Exp Brain Res 74(3):649–652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buhler R, Magistris MR, Treffert A, Hess CW, Rosler KM (2001) The triple stimulation technique to study central motor conduction to the lower limbs. Clin Neurophysiol 112(5):938–949

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Capaday C, Lavoie BA, Barbeau H, Schneider C, Bonnard M (1999) Studies on the corticospinal control of human walking: I. Responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 81(1):129–139

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen LO, Andersen JB, Sinkjaer T, Nielsen J (2001) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and stretch reflexes in the tibialis anterior muscle during human walking. J Physiol 531(2):545–557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clamann HP (1993) Motor unit recruitment and the gradation of muscle force. Phys Ther 73(12):830–843

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Claus D, Weis M, Spitzer A (1991) Motor potentials evoked in tibialis anterior by single and paired cervical stimuli in man. Neurosci Lett 125(2):198–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Curt A, Keck ME, Dietz V (1998) Functional outcome following spinal cord injury: Significance of motor–evoked potentials. Arch Phys Med Rehab 79:81–86

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. de Noordhout AM, Pepin JL, Gerard P, Delwaide PJ (1992) Facilitation of responses to motor cortex stimulation: effects of isometric voluntary contraction. Ann Neurol 32(3):365–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Noordhout AM, Rapisarda G, Bogacz D, Gerard P, De Pasqua V, Pennisi G, Delawaide PJ (1999) Corticomotoneuronal synaptic connections in normal man: an electrophysiological study. Brain 122:1327–1340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Proficue P, Insola A, Mazzone P, Tonali P, Rothwell JC (1999) Effects of voluntary contraction on descending volleys evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation over the motor cortex hand area in conscious humans. Exp Brain Res 124:525–528

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Profice P, Ferrara L, Saturno E, Pilato F, Tonali P (1999) The diagnostic value of motor evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 110(7):1297–1307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellaway PH, Davey NJ, Maskill DW, Rawlinson SR, Lewis HS, Anissimova NP (1998) Variability in the amplitude of skeletal muscle responses to magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 109(2):104–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Enoka RM (1995) Morphological features and activation patterns of motor units. J Clin Neurophysiol 12(6):538–559

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Flament D, Goldsmith P, Buckley CJ, Lemon RN (1993) Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseus muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man. J Physiol 464:361–378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Funase K, Miles TS, Gooden BR (1999) Trial–to–trial fluctuations in H–reflexes and motor evoked potentials in human wrist flexors. Neurosci Lett 271(1):25–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hasegawa Y, Kasai T, Tsuji T, Yahagi S (2001) Further insight into the taskdependent excitability of motor evoked potentials in first dorsal interosseus muscle in humans. Exp Brain Res 140(4):387–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray NM (1987) Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain. J Physiol 388:397–419

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Humm AM, Z’Graggen WJ, von Hornstein NE, Magistris MR, Rosler KM (2004) Assessment of central motor conduction to intrinsic hand muscles using the triple stimulation technique: normal values and repeatability. Clin Neurophysiol 115(11):2558–2566

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones KE, Lyons M, Bawa P, Lemon RN (1994) Recruitment order of motoneurons during functional tasks. Exp Brain Res 100(3):503–508

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kasai T, Kawai S, Kawanishi M, Yohagi S (1997) Evidence for facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by motor imagery. Brain Res 744(1):147–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Keck ME, Pijnappels M, Schubert M, Colombo G, Curt A, Dietz V (1998) Stumbling reactions in man: influence of corticospinal input. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 109(3):215–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kiers L, Cros D, Chiappa KH, Fang J (1993) Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 89(6):415–423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kimura T, Yamanaka K, Nozaki D, Nakazawa K, Miyoshi T, Akai M, Ohtsuki T (2003) Hysteresis in corticospinal excitability during gradual muscle contraction and relaxation in humans. Exp Brain Res 152:123–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kischka U, Fajfr R, Fellenberg T, Hess CW (1993) Facilitation of motor evoked potentials from magnetic brain stimulation in man: a comparative study of different target muscles. J Clin Neurophysiol 10(4):505–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lentz M, Nielsen JF (2002) Post–exercise– facilitation and depression of M wave and motor evoked potentials in healthy subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 113(7):1092–1098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Magistris MR, Rosler KM, Truffert A, Landis T, Hess CW (1999) A clinical study of motor evoqued potentials using a triple stimulation technique. Brain 122 (2):265–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maton B (1980) Fast and slow motor units: their recruitment for tonic and phasic contraction in normal man. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 43(1):45–55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Maynard FM Jr, Bracken MB, Crearey G, Ditunno JF Jr, Donovan WH, Ducke TB (1997) International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Spinal Cord 35:266–274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mills KR, Kimiskidis V (1996) Cortical and spinal mechanisms of facilitation to brain stimulation. Muscle Nerve 19(8):953–958

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nielsen J, Petersen N (1995) Evidence favouring different descending pathways to soleus motoneurones activated by magnetic brain stimulation in man. J Physiol 486(3):779–788

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Palmer E, Ashby P (1992) Corticospinal projections to upper limb motoneurones in humans. J Physiol 448:397–412

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Romaiguere P, Vedel JP, Pagni S (1989) Fluctuations in motor unit recruitment threshold during slow isometric contractions of wrist extensor muscles in man. Neurosci Lett 103(1):50–55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rossi F, Triggs WJ, Eisenschenk S (1999) Topographic differences in task–dependent facilitation of magnetic motor evoked potentials. Neurology 52(3):537–540

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rossini PM, Rossi S (1998) Clinical applications of motor evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 106(3):180–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Day BL, Dick JP, Kachi T, Cowan JM, Marsden CD (1987) Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 1. General characteristics of EMG responses in different muscles. Brain 110(5):1173–1190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sbriccoli P, Bazzucchi I, Rosponi A, Bernardi M, De Vito G, Felici F (2003) Amplitude and spectral characteristics of biceps Brachii s EMG depend upon speed of isometric force generation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13(2):139–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schieppati M, Trompetto C, Abbruzzese G (1996) Selective facilitation of responses to cortical stimulation of proximal and distal arm muscles by precision tasks in man. J Physiol 49(12):551–562

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schubert M, Curt A, Jensen L, Dietz V (1997) Corticospinal input in human gait:Modulation of magnetically evoked motor responses. Exp Brain Res 115(2):234–246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sogaard K (1995) Motor unit recruitment pattern during low–level static and dynamic contractions. Muscle Nerve 18(3):292–300

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Thompson PD, Day BL, Rothwell JC, Dressler D, Maertens de Noordhout A, Marsden CD (1991) Further observations on the facilitation of muscle responses to cortical stimulation by voluntary contraction. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 81(5):397–402

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Turton A, Lemon RN (1999) The contribution of fast corticospinal input to the voluntary activation in normal subjects and in stroke patients. Exp Brain Res 129(4):559–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ugawa Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Sakai K, Kanazawa I (1995) Facilitatory effect of tonic voluntary contraction on responses to motor cortex stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 97(6):451–454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Curt MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diehl, P., Kliesch, U., Dietz, V. et al. Impaired facilitation of motor evoked potentials in incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurol 253, 51–57 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-0921-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-0921-x

Key words

Navigation