Skip to main content
Log in

Interferon beta in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

An eight years experience in a specialist multiple sclerosis centre

  • ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objective

Long–term observational studies may provide additional information about the behaviour of different drugs in the post–marketing period. We present the data of our cohort of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with interferon beta (IFNβ).

Methods

We analysed RRMS patients followed for at least 2 years. From 1995, we initiated therapy with IFNβ.As they became available, patients were allocated to one of the IFNs at standard doses (IFNβ–1b, IFNβ–1a i. m. or IFNβ–1a s. c.). Each patient was included in a follow–up protocol containing demographic and baseline clinical data.

Results

Between 1995 and 2004, 382 patients have completed at least 2 years of follow–up. Significant differences at entry were observed. Patients on IFNβ–1b had a higher disease activity and disability at baseline than those on IFNβ–1a i. m. or IFNβ–1a s. c. A significant reduction in the relapse rate was observed for the three drugs (70 % for IFNβ–1b, 64% for IFNβ–1a i. m. and 74 % for IFNβ–1a s. c.). We observed a sustained progression of disability in 11% of patients on IFNβ–1b, 17% on IFNβ–1a i. m. and 19% on IFNβ–1a s. c.; and at four years of follow–up in 24% of patients on IFNβ–1b, 23% on IFNβ–1a i. m. and 35% on IFNβ–1a s. c. No unexpected major adverse events were observed with any of the drugs.

Conclusions

Interferon beta is safe and well tolerated. The various registered interferon beta drugs provide a comparable efficacy in a large non–selected cohort of RRMS patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (1993) Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. I. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 43:655–661

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobs LD, Cookfair DL, Rudick RA, Herndon RM, et al. (1996) Intramuscular interferon β-1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 39:285–294

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. PRIMS Study Group (1998) Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of interferon β-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Lancet 352:1498–1504

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Paty DW, Li DK, for the University of British Columbia MS/MRI Study Group and the IFNβ Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (1993) Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. II. MRI analysis results of a multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 43:662–667

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simon JH, Jacobs LD, Campion M, et al. for the Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group (1998) Magnetic Resonance studies of intramuscular interferon β-1a for the relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 43:79–87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li DK, Paty DW (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging results of the PRISMS trial: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of interferon- β1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 46:197–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Durelli L, Verdun E, Barbero P, et al. (2002) Every-other-day interferon beta-1b versus once-weekly interferon beta-1a for multiple sclerosis: Results of a 2-year prospective randomised multicentre study (INCOMIN). Lancet 359:1453–1460

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Panitch H, Goodin DS, Francis G, et al. EVIDENCE Study Group (2002) Randomized, comparative study of interferon beta-1a treatment regimens in MS: The EVIDENCE Trial. Neurology 59:1496–1506

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clanet M, Radue EW, Kappos L, et al. (2002) A randomized, double-blind, dose-comparison study of weekly interferon beta-1a in relapsing MS. Neurology 59:1507–1517

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Noseworthy J, O’Brien P, Erickson BJ, Lee D, et al. (1998) The Mayo Clinic Canadian-Cooperative Trial of Sulfasalazine in active multiple sclerosis. Neurology 51:1342–1352

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rio J, Nos C, Tintore M, et al. (2002) Assessment of different treatment failure criteria in a cohort of relapsingremitting MS patients treated with interferon beta. Implications for clinical trials. Ann Neurol 52:400–406

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wingerchuk DM, Noseworthy JH (2002) Randomized controlled trials to assess therapies for multiple sclerosis. Neurology 58(8 Suppl 4):S40–S48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, McDonald WI, et al. (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 13:227–231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Benson K, Arthur HJ (2000) A comparison of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. N Eng J Med 342:1878–1886

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Concato J, Shah N, Horowitz RI (2000) Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 342:1887–1892

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pocock SJ, Elbourne DR (2000) Randomized trials or observational tribulations? N Engl J Med 342:1907–1909

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Interferon beta-1b in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: final outcome of the randomized controlled trial (1995) The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group and The University of British Columbia MS/MRI Analysis Group. Neurology 45:1277–1285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. PRISMS Study Group and the University of British Columbia MS/MRI Analysis Group (2001) PRISMS-4: Long-term efficacy of interferon-β-1a in relapsing MS. Neurology 56: 1628–1636

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Trojano M, Liguori M, Paolicelli D, et al. (2003) Interferon beta in relapsing- remitting multiple sclerosis: an independent postmarketing study in southern Italy. Mult Scler 9:451–457

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Waubant E, Vukosic S, Gignoux L, et al. (2003) Clinical characteristics of responders to interferon therapy for relapsing MS. Neurology 61:184–189

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dubois BD, Keenan E, Porter BE, et al. (2003) Interferon beta in multiple sclerosis: experience in a British specialist multiple sclerosis centre. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:946–949

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weinshenker BG, Ebers GC (1987) The natural history of multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci 14:255–261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Goodin DS (2003) Interferons in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Lancet 361:1821

    Google Scholar 

  24. Malucchi S, Sala A, Gilli F, et al. (2004) Neutralizing antibodies reduce the efficacy of IFNβ during treatment of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 62: 2031–2037

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Río.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Río, ., Tintoré, M., Nos, C. et al. Interferon beta in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 252, 795–800 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-0748-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-0748-5

Key words

Navigation