Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social cognition and metacognition in obsessive–compulsive disorder: an explorative pilot study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is a severe psychiatric condition that is, among other features, characterized by marked impairment in social functioning. Although theoretically plausible with regard to neurobiological underpinnings of OCD, there is little research about possible impairments in social cognitive and meta-cognitive abilities and their connections with social functioning in patients with OCD. Accordingly, we sought to examine social cognitive skills and metacognition in OCD. Twenty OCD patients and age-, sex-, and education-matched 20 healthy controls were assessed using neurocognitive and diverse social cognitive skills including the Ekman 60 Faces test, the Hinting Task, the faux pas test, and a proverb test. In addition, the Metacognition Questionnaire-30 was administered to both the OCD and the control groups. Social functioning was measured using the Personal and Social Performance Scale. Symptom severity in patients was determined by the Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale and the Maudsley Obsessive–Compulsive Inventory. No group differences emerged in basic social cognitive abilities. In contrast, compared to controls, OCD patients scored higher on all MCQ dimensions, particularly negative beliefs about worry, uncontrollability, and danger; beliefs about need to control thoughts; and cognitive self-consciousness. There were no significant correlations between social or metacognitive parameters and OCD symptom severity. However, in the patient group, depression and metacognition predicted social functioning. OCD patients show normal basal social cognitive abilities, but dysfunctional metacognitive profiles, which may contribute to their psychosocial impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kessler RC, Petukhova M, Sampson NA et al (2012) Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 21:169–184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Menzies L, Chamberlain SR, Laird AR et al (2010) Integrating evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies of obsessive–compulsive disorder: the orbitofronto-striatal model revisited. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:525–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bodden ME, Dodel R, Kalbe E (2010) Theory of mind in Parkinson’s disease and related basal ganglia disorders: a systematic review. Mov Disord 25:13–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adolphs R (2001) The neurobiology of social cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:231–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Premack D, Woodruff G (1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav Brain Sci 4:515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brüne M, Brüne-Cohrs U (2006) Theory of mind-evolution, ontogeny, brain mechanisms and psychopathology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:437–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brüne M (2005) “Theory of mind” in schizophrenia: a review of the literature. Schizophr Bull 31:21–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biedermann F, Frajo-Apor B, Hofer A (2012) Theory of mind and its relevance in schizophrenia. Curr Opin Psychiatry 25:71–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolf F, Brüne M, Assion HJ (2010) Theory of mind and neurocognitive functioning in patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 12:657–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cusi AM, Nazarov A, Holshausen K et al (2012) Systematic review of the neural basis of social cognition in patients with mood disorders. J Psychiatry Neurosci 37:154–169

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Brüne M, Blank K, Witthaus H, Saft C (2011) “Theory of mind” is impaired in Huntington’s disease. Mov Disord 26:671–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sayin A, Oral N, Utku C et al (2010) Theory of mind in obsessive–compulsive disorder: comparison with healthy controls. Eur Psychiatry 25:116–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Happé FG, Brownell H, Winner E (1999) Acquired, “theory of mind” impairments following stroke. Cognition 20:211–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wells A, Matthews G (1996) Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: the S-REF model. Behav Res Ther 34:881–888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher PL, Wells A (2005) Experimental modification of beliefs in obsessive–compulsive disorder: a test of the metacognitive model. Behav Res Ther 43:821–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moritz S, Peters MJ, Laroi F, Lincoln TM (2010) Metacognitive beliefs in obsessive–compulsive patients: a comparison with healthy and schizophrenia participants. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 15:31–548

    Google Scholar 

  17. Myers SG, Wells A (2005) Obsessive–compulsive symptoms: the contribution of metacognitions and responsibility. J Anxiety Disord 19:806–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Exner C, Kohl A, Zaudig M et al (2009) Metacognition and episodic memory in obsessive–compulsive disorder. J Anxiety Disord 23:624–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cucci M, Bottelli V, Cavadini D et al (2012) An explorative study on metacognition in obsessive–compulsive disorder and panic disorder. Compr Psychiatry 53:546–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Önen S, Ugurlu GK, Cayköylü A (2013) The relationship between metacognitions and insight in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Compr Psychiatry 54:541–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shafran R, Rachman S (2004) Thought action fusion: a review. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 35:87–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brüne M (2014) Metacognition in schizophrenia: a concept coming of age. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 51:63–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edition, text revision. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Dilling H, Freyberger HJ (eds) (1999) Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen (ICD-10). Taschenführer zur ICD-10-Klassifikation psychischer Störungen. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA et al (1989) The Yale-Brown obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) I. Development, use and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46:1006–1011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA et al (1989) The Yale-Brown obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) II. Validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46:1012–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hodgson RJ, Rachman S (1977) Obsessional compulsive complaints. Behav Res Ther 15:389–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hamilton M (1967) Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 6:278–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Beck AR, Ward C, Mendelson M (1976) Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Arch Gen Psychiatry 4:561–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE (1970) State-Trait-anxiety-inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  31. Laux L, Glanzmann P, Schaffner P, Spielberger CD (1981) Das State-Trait-Angstinventar. Beltz Test GmbH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  32. National Institute of Mental Health (1970) 12-CGI. Clinical global impressions. In: Guy W, Bonato RR (eds) Manual for the ECDEU assessment battery, 2 Rev edn. Chevy Chase, Maryland, pp 12.1–12.6

    Google Scholar 

  33. Morosini PL, Magliano L, Brambilla L et al (2000) Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1001:323–329

    Google Scholar 

  34. Juckel G, Morosini PL (2008) The new approach: psychosocial functioning as a necessary outcome criterion for therapeutic success in schizophrenia. Curr Opin Psychiatry 21:630–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lehrl S, Der MWT (1976) Ein Intelligenztest für die ärztliche Praxis. Neurologie und Psychiatrie 7:488–491

    Google Scholar 

  36. Baddeley A, Emslie H, Nimmo-Smith I (1993) The spot-the word test: a robust estimate of verbal intelligence on lexical decision. Br J Clin Psychol 32:55–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wilson BA, Alderman N, Burgess P et al (1996) Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). Thames Test Company, Bury St Edmunds

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ekman P, Friesen W (1976) Pictures of facial affect. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stone VE, Baron-Cohen S, Knight RT (1998) Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. J Cogn Neurosci 10:640–656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gregory C, Lough S, Stone V et al (2002) Theory of mind in patients with frontal variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer`s disease: theoretical and practical implications. Brain 125:752–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Barth A, Küfferle B (2001) Die Entwicklung eines Sprichworttests zur Erfassung konkretistischer Denkstörungen bei schizophrenen Patienten. Nervenarzt 72:853–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Brüne M, Bodenstein L (2005) Proverb comprehension reconsidered-“Theory of mind” and the pragmatic use of language in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 75:233–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bömmer I, Brüne M (2006) Social cognition in “pure” delusional disorder. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 11:493–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wells A, Cartwright-Hatton S (2004) A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ 30. Behav Res Ther 42:385–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cartwright-Hatton S, Wells A (1997) Beliefs about worry and intrusions: the metacognitions questionnaire and its correlates. Behav Res Ther 34:163–173

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wells A, Cartwright-Hatton S (2004) A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ 30. Behav Res Ther 42:385–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Langdon R, Coltheart M, Ward PB, Catts SV (2002) Disturbed communication in schizophrenia: the role of poor pragmatics and poor mind-reading. Psychol Med 32:1273–1284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Langdon R, Coltheart M (2004) Recognition of metaphor and irony in young adults: the impact of schizotypal personality traits. Psychiatry Res 125:9–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kashyap H, Kumar JK, Kandavel T, Reddy YC (2013) Neuropsychological functioning in obsessive–compulsive disorder: are executive functions the key deficit? Compr Psychiatry 54:533–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Greisberg S, McKay D (2003) Neuropsychology of obsessive–compulsive disorder: a review and treatment implications. Clin Psychol Rev 23:95–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Neumann A, Geissner E (2007) Die Bedeutung von Metakognitionen für das Verständnis und die Psychotherapie von Zwang. Verhaltenstherapie 17:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Brüne M (2006) The evolutionary psychology of obsessive–compulsive disorder: the role of cognitive meta representation. Perspect Biol Med 49:317–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wells A (1995) Metacognition and worry: a cognitive model of generalised anxiety disorder. Behav Cogn Psychother 23:301–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Harrington L, Siegert RJ, McClare J (2005) Theory of mind in schizophrenia: a critical review. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 10:249–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Moritz S, Jelinek L, Hauschild M, Naber D (2010) How to treat the untreated: effectiveness of a self-help metacognitive training program (myMCT) for obsessive–compulsive disorder. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 12:209–220

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cognitive Neuropsychiatry and Psychiatric Preventive Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, LWL-University Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Alexandrinenstr. 1, 44791, Bochum, Germany

    Paraskevi Mavrogiorgou, Mareike Bethge, Stefanie Luksnat, Fabio Nalato, Georg Juckel & Martin Brüne

Authors
  1. Paraskevi Mavrogiorgou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mareike Bethge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefanie Luksnat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fabio Nalato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Georg Juckel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Martin Brüne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Brüne.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest with regard to this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mavrogiorgou, P., Bethge, M., Luksnat, S. et al. Social cognition and metacognition in obsessive–compulsive disorder: an explorative pilot study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 266, 209–216 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-016-0669-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-016-0669-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation