Abstract
Background
Funding for paediatric bilateral cochlear implantation became available in Ireland in 2014. Prior to this, children eligible for cochlear implantation received a unilateral implant.
Objective
To examine the cohort of children who received a unilateral cochlear implant in the 4 year period following bilateral cochlear implantation funding becoming available.
Methods
A clinical audit of all children implanted for the first time between July 2014 and July 2018. The unilaterally implanted children (n = 105) were divided into 3 groups according to whether they met the audiometric thresholds for implantation in neither ear (Group 1), one ear (Group 2) or both ears (Group 3). One year post operative functional outcomes were examined for all 3 groups.
Results
All 3 groups showed significant improvements in functional outcomes at 1 year post op. To date, 20% of the unilaterally implanted children have proceeded to get a sequential CI, often where there was no change in audiological status.
Conclusions
The number of children in Groups 1 and 2 highlighted how our decision making around cochlear implantation has changed in recent years. Unilateral cochlear implantation in certain circumstances is good practice, independent of the audiological profile when an experienced multi-disciplinary team (MDT) is involved in the decision making process. Decision making using a holistic model approach is key, including involving the parent/carer and, where appropriate, the child/teenager themselves. A staged bilateral cochlear implant is also a good option, where careful monitoring and support for the first implant has resulted in positive outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
Data available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.
References
Vickers D, De Raeve L, Graham J (2016) International survey of cochlear implant candidacy. Cochlear Implants Int 17:36–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2016.1155809
Vickers D, Kitterick P, Verschuur C et al (2016) Issues in cochlear implant candidacy. Cochlear Implants Int 17:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2016.1163104
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009) Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness. NICE Technol Apprais Guid. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.020301
Carlson ML, Sladen DP, Gurgel RK et al (2018) Survey of the American Neurotology Society on Cochlear Implantation: Part 1, Candidacy Assessment and Expanding Indications. Otol Neurotol 39:e12–e19. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001632
Dhondt CMC, Swinnen FKR, Dhooge IJM (2018) Bilateral cochlear implantation or bimodal listening in the paediatric population: retrospective analysis of decisive criteria. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 104:170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.10.043
Archbold S, Lutman ME, Marshall DH (1995) Categories of auditory performance. In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, pp 312–314
Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM, Gregory S (2005) Young deaf children with hearing aids or cochlear implants: early assessment package for monitoring progress. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 69:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.08.016
Archbold S, Lutman M, Nikolopoulos T (1998) Categories of auditory performance: inter-user reliability. Br J Audiol 32:7–12. https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000045
Allen MC, Nikolopoulos TP, O’Donoghue GM (1998) Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 19:742–746
Zhou H, Chen Z, Shi H et al (2013) Categories of auditory performance and speech intelligibility ratings of early-implanted children without speech training. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0053852
Tobey EA, Thal D, Niparko JK et al (2013) Influence of implantation age on school-age language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 52:219–229. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2012.759666
Fitzpatrick EM, Ham J, Whittingham J (2015) Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: Why Do Children Receive Implants Late? Ear Hear 36:688–694. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000184
Hardonk S, Daniels S, Desnerck G et al (2011) Deaf parents and pediatric cochlear implantation: an exploration of the decision-making process. Am Ann Deaf 156:290–304. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2011.0027
Mitchiner JC (2015) Deaf parents of cochlear-implanted children: beliefs on bimodal bilingualism. Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enu028
O’Neill C, Lamb B, Archbold S et al (2016) Cost implications for changing candidacy or access to service within a publicly funded healthcare system? Cochlear Implants Int 17:31–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2016.1161123
Greaver L, Eskridge H, Teagle HFB (2017) Considerations for pediatric cochlear implant recipients with unilateral or asymmetric hearing loss: Assessment, device fitting, and habilitation. Am J Audiol 26:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJA-16-0051
Polonenko MJ, Papsin BC, Gordon KA (2018) Limiting asymmetric hearing improves benefits of bilateral hearing in children using cochlear implants. Sci Rep 8:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31546-8
Sadadcharam M, Warner L, Henderson L et al (2016) Unilateral cochlear implantation in children with a potentially useable contralateral ear. Cochlear Implants Int 17:55–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2016.1155832
Boyd PJ (2015) Potential benefits from cochlear implantation of children with unilateral hearing loss. Cochlear Implants Int 16:121–136
Gordon K, Henkin Y, Kral A (2015) Asymmetric hearing during development: the aural preference syndrome and treatment options. Pediatrics 136:141–153. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-3520
Leigh JR, Dettman SJ, Dowell RC (2016) Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for young children: audiological criteria and optimizing age at implantation. Int J Audiol 55:S9–S18. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2016.1157268
Lovett RES, Vickers DA, Summerfield AQ (2015) Bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children: criterion of candidacy derived from an observational study. Ear Hear 36:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000087
Acknowledgements
Thanks to the paediatric SLT team at the NHIRC for discussions around specific cases (namely, Patsy Costello, Antonia Hussey and Jennifer Robertson).
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
OF designed the audit, collected data, analysed data and wrote the manuscript. CSF analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. LV, PW and FG provided a supporting role in the audit and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have stated that they had no interests that might be perceived as posing a conflict or bias.
Ethics approval
This audit did not require ethics approval as it analysed routinely collected data. The audit was registered with and approved by Beaumont Hospital's Clinical Audit and Governance Department (CA305).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferguson, O., Simões-Franklin, C., Walshe, P. et al. In an era of bilateral funding and changing criteria, when is unilateral cochlear implantation a better option?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279, 5913–5920 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07500-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07500-w