Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effects of different environmental pH on healing of tympanic membrane: an experimental study

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 15 February 2016

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effect of environmental pH on healing of acute rat tympanic membrane perforations. Twenty Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups and used in the study. A large myringotomy was performed in the posteroinferior quadrants of both tympanic membranes. In left ears, topical pH 4 standard calibration solution was used in groups 1 and 3, and pH 7 standard calibration solution was used in groups 2 and 4. Right ears served as controls, and allowed for spontaneous healing. The solutions were applied for 2 days in groups 1 and 2, and for 7 days in groups 3 and 4. Healing was assessed by macroscopic closure of the tympanic membrane perforation, and histopathological analysis of lamina propria edema, neovascularization, inflammatory cells, and fibroblastic reaction in the temporal bones. pH 7 and pH 4 groups were similar for macroscopic closure of perforation on day 2; however difference was significant on day 7. The fibroblastic activity was significantly less on days 2 and 7 in pH 4 group. On day 7, there were significant differences between pH 4 and pH 7, and pH 7 and control groups for inflammatory cell infiltration. In conclusion, clinical and histopathological results of this study indicated that acidic environmental pH speeded up and shortened wound-healing process. By building up optimum environmental pH, a healthy healing may be achieved in acute tympanic membrane perforations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson AP, Smallman LA, Kent SE (1990) The mechanism of healing of tympanic membrane perforations. A two-dimensional histological study in guinea pigs. Acta Otolaryngol 109:406–415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Araújo MM, Murashima AA, Alves VM et al (2014) Spontaneous healing of the tympanic membrane after traumatic perforation in rats. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 80:330–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schneider LA, Korber A, Grabbe S et al (2007) Influence of pH on wound-healing: a new perspective for wound-therapy? Arch Dermatol Res 298:413–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rippke F, Schreiner V, Schwanitz HJ (2002) The acidic milieu of the horny layer: new findings on the physiology and pathophysiology of skin pH. Am J Clin Dermatol 3:261–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Meara S, Cullum N, Majid M et al (2000) Systemic review of wound care management: (3) antimicrobial agents for chronic wounds; (4) diabetic foot ulceration. Health Technol Assess 4:1–237

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stewart CM, Cole MB, Legan JD et al (2002) Staphylococcus aureus growth boundaries: moving towards mechanistic predictive models basedon solute-specific effects. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1864–1871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Runeman B, Faergemann J, Larko O (2000) Experimental Candida albicans lesions in healthy humans: dependence on skin pH. Acta Derm Venereol 80:421–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurabayashi H, Tamura K, Machida I et al (2002) Inhibiting bacteria and skin pH in hemiplegia: effects of washing hands with acidic mineral water. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81:40–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Robbins SL (1994) Robbins pathologic basis of disease. In: Robbins SL, Cotran RS, Kumar V (eds) Inflammation and repair. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 52–92

    Google Scholar 

  10. Siervo S (2008) Suturing techniques in oral surgery. Quintessence Publishing, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  11. Şenol M (1995) Wound healing. T Clin J Dermatol 5:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts G, Hammad L, Collins C et al (2002) Some effects of sustained compression on ulcerated tissues. Angiology 53:451–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shukla VK, Shukla D, Tiwary SK et al (2007) Evaluation of pH measurement as a method of wound assessment. J Wound Care 16:291–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mercier RC, Stumpo C, Rybak MJ (2002) Effect of growth phase and pH on the in vitro activity of a new glycopeptide, oritavancin (LY333328), against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium. J Antimicrob Chemother 50:19–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greener B, Hughes AA, Bannister NP et al (2005) Proteases and pH in chronic wounds. J Wound Care 14:59–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sule Demirci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest. No financial support was obtained for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akkoc, A., Celik, H., Arslan, N. et al. The effects of different environmental pH on healing of tympanic membrane: an experimental study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 2503–2508 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3859-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3859-3

Keywords

Navigation