Abstract
Downbeat nystagmus (DBN) is caused by an impairment of Purkinje cells in the flocculus. The decreased cerebellar inhibitory input affects otolith pathways. Since ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (o-/cVEMP) test the otoliths, the VEMP were measured in DBN patients and in controls. Sixteen patients with DBN, 14 cerebellar oculomotor disorder patients without DBN (COMD), and 16 healthy controls were examined with o-/cVEMP. Computational modeling was used to predict VEMP differences between groups. DBN patients had significantly higher oVEMP peak-to-peak (PP) amplitudes than COMD patients without DBN and controls. Cervical VEMP did not differ. The computational model of DBN predicted a twofold oVEMP increase for DBN patients. These findings suggest an enhancement of the utriculo-ocular response. The unchanged cVEMP indicate no effect on the otolith-cervical reflex in DBN. Computational modeling suggests that the utriculo-ocular enhancement is caused by an impaired vertical neural integrator resulting in the increased influence of utricular signals. This also explains the gravitational dependence of DBN.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kalla R, Deutschlander A, Hufner K, Stephan T, Jahn K, Glasauer S, Brandt T, Strupp M (2006) Detection of floccular hypometabolism in downbeat nystagmus by fMRI. Neurology 66:281–283
Hüfner K, Stephan T, Kalla R, Deutschländer A, Wagner J, Holtmannspötter M, Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Strupp M, Brandt T, Glasauer S (2007) Structural and functional MRIs disclose cerebellar pathologies in idiopathic downbeat nystagmus. Neurology 69:1128–1235
Wagner JN, Glaser M, Brandt T, Strupp M (2008) Downbeat nystagmus: aetiology and comorbidity in 117 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:672–677
Marti S, Palla A, Straumann D (2002) Gravity dependence of ocular drift in patients with cerebellar downbeat nystagmus. Ann Neurol 52:712–721
Zee DS, Yamazaki A, Butler PH, Gücer G (1981) Effects of ablation of flocculus and paraflocculus on eye movements in primate. J Neurophysiol 46:878–899
Glasauer S, Strupp M, Kalla R, Büttner U, Brandt T (2005) Effect of 4-aminopyridine on upbeat and downbeat nystagmus elucidates the mechanism of downbeat nystagmus. Ann NY Acad Sci 1039:528–531
Wagner J, Lehnen N, Glasauer S, Rettinger N, Büttner U, Brandt T, Strupp M (2009) Downbeat nystagmus caused by a paramedian ponto-medullary lesion. J Neurol 256:1572–1574
Nakamagoe K, Fujizuka N, Koganezawa T, Yamaguchi T, Tamaoka A (2013) Downbeat nystagmus associated with damage to the medial longitudinal fasciculus of the pons: a vestibular balance control mechanism via the lower brainstem paramedian tract neurons. J Neurol Sci 328:98–101
Helmchen C, Glasauer S, Sprenger A (2013) Inverse eye position dependency of downbeat nystagmus in midline medullary lesion. J Neurol 260:2908–2910
Curthoys IS, Burgess AM, MacDougall HG, McGarvie LA, Halmagyi GM, Smulders YE, Iwasaki S (2009) Testing human otolith function using bone-conducted vibration. Ann NY Acad Sci 1164:344–346
Curthoys IS, Iwasaki S, Chihara Y, Ushio M, McGarvie LA, Burgess AM (2011) The ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential to air-conducted sound; probable superior vestibular nerve origin. Clin Neurophysiol 122:611–616
Colebatch JG, Halmagyi GM (2000) Vestibular evoked potentials in human neck muscles before and after unilateral vestibular deafferentation. Neurology 42:1635–1636
Curthoys I, Manzari L (2013) Otolithic disease: clinical features and the role of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Semin Neurol 33:231–237
Colebatch JG, Halmagyi GM, Skuse NF (1994) Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 57:190–197
Agrawal Y, Bremova T, Kremmyda O, Strupp M (2013) Semicircular canal, saccular and utricular function in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy: analysis based on etiology. J Neurol 260:876–883
Smulders YE, Welgampola MS, Burgess AM, McGarvie LA, Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS (2009) The n10 component of the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) is distinct from the R1 component of the blink reflex. Clin Neurophysiol 120:1567–1576
Nguyen KD, Welgampola MS, Carey JP (2010) Test-retest reliability and age-related characteristics of the ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential tests. Otol Neurotol 31:793–802
Marti S, Straumann D, Büttner U, Glasauer S (2008) A model-based theory on the origin of downbeat nystagmus. Exp Brain Res 188:613–631
Stahl JS, Thumser ZC, Oommen BS (2012) The ataxic mouse as a model for studying downbeat nystagmus. J Vestib Res 22:221–241
Glasauer S, Hoshi M, Kempermann U, Eggert T, Büttner U (2003) Three-dimensional eye position and slow phase velocity in humans with downbeat nystagmus. J Neurophysiol 89:338–354
Crawford JD, Tweed DB, Vilis T (2003) Static ocular counterroll is implemented through the 3-D neural integrator. J Neurophysiol 90:2777–2784
Glasauer S, Dieterich M, Brandt T (2001) Central positional nystagmus simulated by a mathematical ocular motor model of otolith-dependent modification of Listing’s plane. J Neurophysiol 86:1546–1554
Spiegel R, Kalla R, Rettinger N, Schneider E, Straumann D, Marti S, Glasauer S, Brandt T, Strupp M (2010) Head position during resting modifies spontaneous daytime decrease of downbeat nystagmus. Neurology 75:1928–1932
Akin FW, Murnane OD, Tampas JW, Clinard CG (2011) The effect of age on the vestibular evoked myogenic potential and sternocleidomastoid muscle tonic electromyogram level. Ear Hear 32:617–622
Singh NK, Kashyap RS, Supreetha L, Sahana V (2014) Characterization of age-related changes in sacculocolic response parameters assessed by cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:1869–1877
Rosengren SM, Govender S, Colebatch JG (2011) Ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials produced by air- and bone-conducted stimuli: comparative properties and effects of age. Clin Neurophysiol 122:2282–2289
Colebatch JG, Govender S, Rosengren SM (2013) Two distinct patterns of VEMP changes with age. Clin Neurophysiol 124:2066–2068
Bath AP, Harris N, McEwan J, Yardley MP (1999) Effect of conductive hearing loss on the vestibulo-collic reflex. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 24:181–183
Wang MC, Lee GS (2007) Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in middle ear effusion. Acta Otolaryngol 127:700–704
Rosengren SM, Weber KP, Hegemann SC, Roth TN (2014) The effect of alcohol on cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in healthy volunteers. Clin Neurophysiol 125:1700–1708
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) to the German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (grant code 01 EO 0901 and 01 EO 1401) and the Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience (grant code 01 GQ 0440).
Conflict of interest
T. Bremova received speaker’s honoraria from Actelion. S. Glasauer received funding from the DFG and the BMBF, serves as expert reviewer for the European Commission, and holds shares in EyeSeeTec GmbH. M. Strupp is Joint Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neurology, Editor-in-Chief of Frontiers of Neuro-otology and Section Editor of F1000. He received speaker’s honoraria from Abbott, UCB, GSK, TEVA, Biogen Idec, Pierre-Fabre, Eisai, and HennigPharma.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
The previously published model ([18], see their Figure 1) can be slightly simplified for the present simulations by setting several inputs to zero.
In particular, for the oVEMP simulation we can neglect saccadic eye movements, there is no semicircular canal input, the visual input can be neglected due to the open-loop character of oVEMP, and the eye plant equation describing mainly the dynamics of the eyeball is not required, since oVEMP are measured at the level of the extraocular eye muscles. Consequently, the remaining equations aredepends on the PC gain
-
1.
the utricular input \(u = g_{u} \cdot \sin \alpha + \delta_{\text{tap}}\) with α being the pitch angle of the head and δ tap the oVEMP stimulus (“otoliths” in [18] Figure 1),
-
2.
the brainstem integrator (“INC” in [18] Figure 1) in Laplace notation (s is the complex frequency) can be written as \(e_{i} = \left( { - p + c_{\text{ft}} - u} \right) \cdot \frac{{\tau_{\text{b}} - \tau_{\text{e}} }}{{1 + \tau_{\text{b}} s}}\) with τ b and τ e being the time constants of brainstem integrator and eye plant, p being the PC output, and c ft a bias term compensating for the PC resting discharge,
-
3.
the motor command \(m = \left( { - p + c_{\text{ft}} } \right) \cdot \tau_{\text{e}} + e_{i}\) sent to the eye muscles (input to “eye plant” in [18] Figure 1),
-
4.
the floccular loop yielding the PC output \(p = g \cdot v_{\text{e}} + p_{\text{rest}}\) (“FL-Purkinje-cells” in [18] Figure 1) with g being the PC gain factor, v e being the internal estimate of eye velocity \(v_{\text{e}} = \frac{s}{{1 + \tau_{\text{e}} s}} \cdot m\), and p rest being the PC resting discharge (normally p rest = c ft).
Given these equations, we can now solve for the motor command following an oVEMP tap δ tap. First, we set \(p = g \cdot \frac{s}{{1 + \tau_{\text{e}} s}}m + p_{\text{rest}}\) and plug (2) into (3) as \(m = ( - p + c_{\text{ft}} ) \cdot \tau_{\text{e}} + ( - p + c_{\text{ft}} - u)\frac{{\tau_{\text{b}} - \tau_{\text{e}} }}{{1 + \tau_{\text{b}} s}}\). Ignoring the bias terms (assuming they cancel out) we can simplify and get \(m = - p \cdot \frac{{(1 + \tau_{\text{e}} s)\tau_{\text{b}} }}{{1 + \tau_{\text{e}} s}} - u\frac{{\tau_{\text{b}} - \tau_{\text{e}} }}{{1 - \tau_{\text{b}} s}}\). Now we can insert p and solve for m: \(m = - \frac{{\tau_{\text{b}} - \tau_{\text{e}} }}{{1 + \tau_{\text{b}} (1 + g)s}}u\). The oVEMP input to the utricle can be approximated as impulse with amplitude d resulting in a muscle response of \(m = - \frac{{\tau_{\text{b}} - \tau_{\text{e}} }}{{\tau_{\text{b}} (1 + g)}}d\), which depends on the PC gain g. As in [18], to simulate healthy subjects, the gain is set to g = 10, while for an average DBN patient the gain can be set to about g = 5. If the oVEMP amplitude d is the same in both healthy subjects and patients, independently of the other constants we thus get \(m_{\text{DBN}} = \frac{{1 + g_{\text{healthy}} }}{{1 + g_{\text{DBN}} }} \cdot m_{\text{healthy}} = 1.83 \cdot m_{\text{healthy}}\), i.e. a motor command to the eye muscles which is about 180 % of the amplitude in DBN patients. Note that this analytical derivation assumes upright position and gaze straight ahead. Due to the nonlinear Purkinje cell activation function, the relation changes to lower values with upward gaze and pitch-back position.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bremova, T., Glasauer, S. & Strupp, M. Downbeat nystagmus: evidence for enhancement of utriculo-ocular pathways by ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 3575–3583 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3653-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3653-2