Skip to main content
Log in

Gender and modulation frequency effects on auditory steady state response (ASSR) thresholds

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For estimating behavioral hearing thresholds, auditory steady state response (ASSR) can be reliably evoked by stimuli at low and high modulation frequencies (MFs). In this regard, little is known regarding ASSR thresholds evoked by stimuli at different MFs in female and male participants. In fact, recent data suggest that 40-Hz ASSR is influenced by estrogen level in females. Hence, the aim of the present study was to determine the effect of gender and MF on ASSR thresholds in young adults. Twenty-eight normally hearing participants (14 males and 14 females) were enrolled in this study. For each subject, ASSR thresholds were recorded with narrow-band chirps at 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz carrier frequencies (CFs) and at 40 and 90 Hz MFs. Two-way mixed ANOVA (with gender and MF as the factors) revealed no significant interaction effect between factors at all CFs (p > 0.05). The gender effect was only significant at 500 Hz CF (p < 0.05). At 500 and 1,000 Hz CFs, mean ASSR thresholds were significantly lower at 40 Hz MF than at 90 Hz MF (p < 0.05). Interestingly, at 2,000 and 4,000 Hz CFs, mean ASSR thresholds were significantly lower at 90 Hz MF than at 40 Hz MF (p < 0.05). The lower ASSR thresholds in females might be due to hormonal influence. When recording ASSR thresholds at low MF, we suggest the use of gender-specific normative data so that more valid comparisons can be made, particularly at 500 Hz CF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osterhammel PA, Shallop JK, Terkildsen K (1985) The effect of sleep on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and the middle latency response (MLR). Scand Audiol 14(1):47–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zirn S, Louza J, Reiman V, Wittlinger N, Hempel JM, Schuster M (2014) Comparison between ABR with click and narrow band chirp stimuli in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78(8):1352–1355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. François M, Teissier N, Barthod G, Nasra Y (2012) Sedation for children 2 to 5 years of age undergoing auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state responses recordings. Int J Audiol 51(4):282–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Luts H, Wouters J (2005) Comparison of MASTER and AUDERA for measurement of auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 44(4):244–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cebulla M, Stürzebecher E, Elberling C (2006) Objective detection of auditory steady-state responses: comparison of one-sample and q-sample tests. J Am Acad Audiol 17(2):93–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Naves KF, Pereira AA, Nasuto SJ, Russo IP, Andrade AO (2012) Assessment of inter-examiner agreement and variability in the manual classification of auditory brainstem response. Biomed Eng Online 11:86

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. D’haenens W, Dhooge I, De Vel E, Maes L, Bockstael A, Vinck BM (2007) Auditory steady-state responses to MM and exponential envelope AM(2)/FM stimuli in normal-hearing adults. Int J Audiol 46(8):399–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodrigues GR, Lewis DR (2014) Establishing auditory steady-state response thresholds to narrow band CE-chirps(®) in full-term neonates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78(2):238–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mühler R, Rahne T, Mentzel K, Verhey JL (2014) 40-Hz multiple auditory steady-state responses to narrow-band chirps in sedated and anaesthetized infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78(5):762–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Batra R, Kuwada S, Stanford TR (1989) Temporal coding of envelopes and their interaural delays in the inferior colliculus of the unanaesthetized rabbit. J Neurophysiol 61(2):257–268

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuwada S, Anderson J, Batra R, Fitzpatrick DC, Teissier N, D’Angelo WR (2002) Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. J Am Acad Audiol 13(4):188–204

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Maanen A, Stapells DR (2005) Comparison of multiple auditory steady-state responses (80 vs. 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol 44(11):613–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomlin D, Rance G, Graydon K, Tsialios I (2006) Comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects. Int J Audiol 45(10):580–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Luts H, Desloovere C, Kumar A, Vandermeersch E, Wouters J (2004) Objective assessment of frequency-specific hearing thresholds in babies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 68(7):915–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee HS, Ahn JH, Chung JW, Yoon TH, Lee KS (2008) Clinical comparison of the auditory steady-state response with the click auditory brainstem response in infants. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 1(4):184–188

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Scherf F, Brokx J, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH (2006) The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure-tone audiometry. Int J Audiol 45(5):281–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin YH, Ho CH, Wu HP (2009) Comparison of auditory steady state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Auris Nasus Larynx 36(2):140–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dehan CP, Jerger J (1990) Analysis of gender differences in the auditory brainstem response. Laryngoscope 100(1):18–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McFadden D, Hsieh MD, Garcia-Sierra A, Champlin CA (2010) Differences by sex, ear, and sexual orientation in the time intervals between successive peaks in auditory evoked potentials. Hear Res 270(1–2):56–64

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Vohs JL, Chambers RA, Krishnan GP, O’Donnell BF, Berg S, Morzorati SL (2010) GABAergic modulation of the 40 Hz auditory steady-state response in a rat model of schizophrenia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 13(4):487–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Vohs JL, Chambers RA, O’Donnell BF, Krishnan GP, Morzorati SL (2012) Auditory steady state responses in a schizophrenia rat model probed by excitatory/inhibitory receptor manipulation. Int J Psychophysiol 86(2):136–142

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Griskova-Bulanova I, Griksiene R, Korostenskaja M, Ruksenas O (2014) 40 Hz auditory steady-state response in females: when is it better to entrain? Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 74(1):91–97

    Google Scholar 

  23. Huang GZ, Woolley CS (2012) Estradiol acutely suppresses inhibition in the hippocampus through a sex-specific endocannabinoid and mGluR dependent mechanism. Neuron 74(5):801–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Beck RM, Ramos BF, Grasel SS, Ramos HF, Moraes MF, Almeida ER, Bento RF (2014) Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects. Br J Otorhinolaryngol 80(1):35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aoyagi M, Kim Y, Yokoyama J, Kiren T, Suzuki Y, Koike Y (1990) Head size as a basis of gender difference in the latency of the brainstem auditory-evoked response. Audiology 29(2):107–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bowman DM, Brown DK, Kimberley BP (2000) An examination of gender differences in DPOAE phase delay measurements in normal-hearing human adults. Hear Res 142(1–2):1–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. van der Reijden CS, Mens LM, Snik FM (2006) Frequency-specific objective audiometry: tone-evoked brainstem responses and steady-state responses to 40 Hz and 90 Hz amplitude modulated stimuli. Int J Audiol 45(1):40–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Herdman AT, Lins O, Van Room P, Stapells DR, Scherg M, Picton TW (2002) Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr 15(2):69–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mühler R, Mentzel K, Verhey J (2012) Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns. Sci World J 2012:192178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cone B, Dimitrijevic A (2009) The auditory steady state response. In: Katz J, Medwetsky L, Burkhard R, Hood L (eds) Handbook of clinical audiology, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 322–350

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all subjects who participated voluntarily in this study. This study was funded by Research University (RU) Grant (1001/PPSK/812114), Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest arose from the study. The authors are fully responsible for the content of the paper.

Ethical standard

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of Universiti Sains Malaysia and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Normani Zakaria.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zakaria, M.N., Jalaei, B. & Abdul Wahab, N.A. Gender and modulation frequency effects on auditory steady state response (ASSR) thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 349–354 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3555-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3555-3

Keywords

Navigation