Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ossiculoplasty with hydroxyapatite bone cement: our reconstruction philosophy

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to analyze results obtained with hydroxyapatite bone cement (HABC) ossiculoplasties. This is a retrospective study of a case series. This study was conducted in an academic hospital and tertiary referral center. A total of 127 ossiculoplasties using HABC were evaluated. Ears were divided into three groups according to procedure: group 1 involved reinforcement of the incudostapedial joint with cement and reconstruction of an incus long process defect with cement. Group 2 involved partial ossicular reconstruction between the stapes and malleus handle with HABC. Group 3 was divided into two subgroups. Group 3B entailed reconstruction of the stapes with a mobile footplate (Austin–Kartush type B = group 3B) and group 3F with a fixed footplate (Austin–Kartush type F = group 3F) using a K-Helix piston (Grace Medical, Memphis, TN, USA) or a classical titanium piston (Kurz, Fuerth, Germany) glued to the incus remnant or malleus handle with cement. Anatomical and pre- and postoperative audiological results were assessed. The mean follow-up was 26 ± 14 months. Percentages of average postoperative air–bone gap ≤20 dB were 95, 82.5, 50 and 83.3 %, and for air–bone gap ≤10 dB, 80, 50.9, 16.6 and 50 % for groups 1, 2, 3B and 3F, respectively. No complications related to the cement or extrusion occurred. Hearing outcomes also remained stable over time. In our experience, ossiculoplasty with cement provides good and stable functional results, is safe, cost effective, and easy to use. HABC with or without biocompatible ossicular prostheses allows repair of different types of ossicular defects with preservation of the anatomical and physiological ossicular chain, as well as improved stability. Reconstruction of the incus long process or incudostapedial joint defect with cement is preferred over partial ossicular reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen DA, Arriaga MA (2003) Technical refinements and precautions during ionomeric cement reconstruction of incus erosion during revision stapedectomy. Laryngoscope 113(5):848–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Rompaey V, Claes G, Somers T et al (2011) Erosion of the long process of the incus in revision stapes surgery: malleovestibular prosthesis or incus reconstruction with hydroxyapatite bone cement. Otol Neurotol 32(6):914–918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kveton JF, Coelho DH (2004) Hydroxyapatite cement in temporal bone surgery: a 10 year experience. Laryngoscope 114(1):33–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elsheikh MN, Elsherief H, Elsherief S (2006) Physiologic reestablishment of ossicular continuity during excision of retraction pockets: use of hydroxyapatite bone cement for rebridging the incus. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132(2):196–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hantson P, Mahieu P, Gersdorff M et al (1994) Encephalopathy with seizures after use of aluminium-containing bone cement. Lancet 344(8937):1647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kartush JM (1994) Ossicular chain reconstruction. Capitulum to malleus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 27:689–715

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gurgel RK, Popelka GR, Oghalai JS et al (1995) American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:186–187

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Bruijn AJ, Tange RA, Dreschler WA (2001) Efficacy of evaluation of audiometric results after stapes surgery in otosclerosis. II. A method for reporting results from individual cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(1):84–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Babu S, Seidman MD (2004) Ossicular reconstruction using bone cement. Otol Neurotol 25(2):98–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feghali JG, Barrs DM, Beatty CW et al (1998) Bone cement reconstruction of the ossicular chain: a preliminary report. Laryngoscope 108(6):829–836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goebel JA, Jacob A (2005) Use of Mimix hydroxyapatite bone cement for difficult ossicular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132(5):727–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kupperman D, Tange RA (1997) Long-term results of glass ionomer cement, Ionocem, in the middle ear of the rat. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 51(1):27–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Vos C, Gersdorff M, Gérard JM (2007) Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 28(1):61–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bayazit YA, Ozer E, Kanlikama M et al (2005) Bone cement ossiculoplasty: incus to stapes versus malleus to stapes cement bridge. Otol Neurotol 26(3):364–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozer E, Bayazit YA, Kanlikama M et al (2002) Incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty with bone cement. Otol Neurotol 23(5):643–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baglam T, Karatas E, Durucu C et al (2009) Incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty with bone cement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141(2):243–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalcioglu MT, Tan M, Fleerakkers J (2013) The use of bone cement for ossicular chain defects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:2849–2855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No fund received for this work.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors or any relatives have any financial interest in Olympus. Olympus had no part in the writing or approving this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Marc Gérard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gérard, JM., De Bie, G., Franceschi, D. et al. Ossiculoplasty with hydroxyapatite bone cement: our reconstruction philosophy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 1629–1635 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-2975-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-2975-9

Keywords

Navigation