Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of functional results of CWD surgery with ossicular replacement prosthesis due to cholesteatoma using computed tomography

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the use of high-resolution computed tomography, this retrospective clinical study evaluated the factors affecting hearing in patients who were operated on due to chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma and underwent ossiculoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP). Fifteen patients with postoperative hearing results of 20 dB or less air-bone gap, and thirteen patients with postoperative hearing results of 21 dB or more air-bone gap were the subjects of this study. All patients were operated on due to chronic otitis media and underwent ossiculoplasty with titanium TORP. High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) and pure-tone audiometry were performed on each patient after an average of 17 months, postoperatively. Three-dimensional oblique CT cross-sections were analyzed with Vitrea 2® software. The presence of soft tissue in the middle ear and contact between the prosthesis head plate and the bone had an adverse effect on hearing (p < 0.05). The angle between the TORP and the oval window did not seem to affect the hearing results (p > 0.05). The study results indicate that an examination of the patients with poor postoperative hearing with HRCT may help find the possible cause and allow for the determination of the prosthesis location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iseri M, Ustundağ E, Ulubil A, Ozturk M, Bircan O (2012) Synchronous ossiculoplasty with titanium prosthesis during canal wall down surgery for advanced cholesteatoma: anatomical and hearing outcomes. J Laryngol Otol 126:131–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yung MW (2003) Literature review of alloplastic materials in ossiculoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 117:431–436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. House JW, Teufert KB (2001) Extrusion rates and hearing results in ossicular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:135–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grote JJ (1990) Reconstruction of the middle ear with hydroxylapatite implants: long-term results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 144:12–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dalchow CV, Grun D, Stupp HF (2001) Reconstruction of the ossicular chain with titanium implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:628–630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho SY, Battista RA, Wiet RJ (2003) Early results with titanium ossicular implants. Otol Neurotol 24:149–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim HH, Battista RA, Kumar A, Wiet RJ (2006) Should ossicular reconstruction be staged following tympanomastoidectomy. Laryngoscope 116:47–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Truy E, Naiman AN, Pavillon C, Abedipour D, Lina-Granade G, Rabilloud M (2007) Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 28:492–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yung M (2006) Long-term results of ossiculoplasty: reasons for surgical failure. Otol Neurotol 27:20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yung M (2005) Long-term results of ossiculoplasty: reasons for surgical failure. Otol Neurotol 27:20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zahnert T, Huttenbrink KB (2005) Pitfalls in ossicular chain reconstruction. HNO 53(1):89–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodt T, Bartling S, Schmidt AM, Weber BP, Lenarz T, Becker H (2002) Virtual endoscopy of the middle ear: experimental and clinical results of a standardized approach using multi-slice helical computed tomography. Eur Radiol 12:1684–1692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schubert O, Sartor K, Forsting M, Reisser C (1996) Three-dimensional computed display of otosurgical operation sites by spiral CT. Neuroradiology 38:663–668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Black B (2003) Reporting results in ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 24:534–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Austin DF (1971) Ossicular reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol 94:525–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Becvarovski Z, Kartush JM (2001) Smoking and tympanoplasty: implications for prognosis and the middle ear risk index (MERI). Laryngoscope 111:1806–1811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dornhoffer JL, Gardner E (2001) Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty: a statistical staging system. Otol Neurotol 22:299–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shinnabe A, Hara M, Hasegawa M, Matsuzawa S, Kodama K, Kanazawa H, Yoshida N, Iino Y (2011) Relationship between postoperative aeration around the stapes and postoperative hearing outcome after canal wall down tympanoplasty with canal reconstruction for cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 32:1230–1233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huettenbrink KB (1994) Surgery in chronic otitis media. II: Cholesteatoma removal, open and closed techniques. HNO 42:648–657

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN (1995) Mechanical and acoustic analysis of middle ear reconstruction. Am J Otol 16:486–497

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vincent R, Oates J, Sperling NM, Annamalai S (2004) Malleus relocation in ossicular reconstruction: managing the anteriorly positioned malleus: results in a series of 268 cases. Otol Neurotol 25:223–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Herkenhoff S, Fischer B, Gleich O, Strutz J, Kwok P (2011) A micro-computed tomographic study: determination of the angle between the tympanic membrane and stapes footplate in a total ossicular reconstruction prosthesis reconstruction. Otol Neurotol 32:610–615

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Offergeld C, Kromeier J, Merchant SN et al (2010) Experimental investigation of rotational tomography in reconstructed middle ears with clinical implications. Hear Res 263:191–197

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Ozturk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ucar, S., Iseri, M. & Ozturk, M. Evaluation of functional results of CWD surgery with ossicular replacement prosthesis due to cholesteatoma using computed tomography. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 2393–2400 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2733-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2733-4

Keywords

Navigation