Skip to main content
Log in

Audiological implications of earplugs used for the prevention of aural exostoses

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

External auditory canal exostoses may be a preventable disease, so it is surprising that the regular use of water precautions is not greater among surfers. One reason for this is the impairment of hearing whilst wearing earplugs. The objective of this study is to establish the hearing impairment of commonly available earplugs used by surfers. Staff and patients with normal hearing were recruited to have pure tone audiometry performed multiple times, initially with no earplugs, and subsequently with earplugs. Three earplug types were tested which differed in their nature and material (prefabricated elastomer, custom-fitted silicone, and custom-fitted acrylic). Vented and non-vented forms of the earplugs were tested. 30 normal hearing ears were included. Two-tailed paired t-tests comparing hearing thresholds between different earplugs identified that the elastomer earplugs caused the least hearing impairment (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in hearing thresholds between vented and non-vented elastomer earplugs (p = 0.148), but the difference between vented and non-vented forms of other earplugs was statistically significant (silicone p = 0.010, acrylic p = 0.018). Prefabricated ear plugs produce less hearing impairment than other commonly available earplugs. A customised earplug made of hard material causes the greatest impairment of hearing. We therefore recommend that for aquatic sports where hearing is important, a soft prefabricated earplug is preferable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chaplin JM, Stewart IA (1998) The prevalence of exostoses in the external auditory meatus of surfers. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 23:326–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zoltan TB, Taylor KS, Achar SA (2005) Health issues for surfers. Am Fam Phys 71:2313–2317

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hurst W, Bailey M, Hurst B (2004) Prevalence of external auditory canal exostoses in Australian surfboard riders. J Laryngol Otol 118:348–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Umeda Y, Nakajima M, Yoshioka H (1989) Surfer’s ear in Japan. Laryngoscope 99:639–641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Deleyiannis FW, Cockcroft BD, Pinczower EF (1996) Exostoses of the external auditory canal in Oregon surfers. Am J Otolaryngol 17:303–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. DiBartolomeo JR (1979) Exostoses of the external auditory canal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 88(Suppl 61):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  7. Timofeev I, Notkina N, Smith IM (2004) Exostoses of the external auditory canal: a long-term follow-up study of surgical treatment. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 29:588–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reddy VM, Abdelrahman T, Lau A et al (2011) Surfers’ awareness of the preventability of ‘surfer’s ear’ and use of water precautions. J Laryngol Otol 125(6):551–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rice CG, Coles RR (1966) Design factors and use of ear protection. Br J Ind Med 23:194–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Venkat M. Reddy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srinivasan, J., Reddy, V.M. & Flanagan, P.M. Audiological implications of earplugs used for the prevention of aural exostoses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269, 787–790 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1730-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1730-8

Keywords

Navigation