Skip to main content
Log in

Who is performing percutaneous tracheotomies? Practice patterns of surgeons in the USA

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tracheotomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the ICU setting. Traditionally tracheotomy has been performed by otolaryngologists as well as general surgeons. While percutaneous tracheotomy (PT) has been available for some time, it has only recently gained widespread acceptance with the advent of convenient and safe kits. Over the past decade, there has been increased utilization of this technique. However, there is a relative reluctance of certain surgical specialties to perform and train residents in PT; a previous study identified that only 29% of otolaryngology head and neck surgery (OTO-HNS) departments in the USA perform PT. In this study we aim to investigate the trends of PT usage in general surgery training programs and compare them to those previously described in otolaryngology programs. The study design is multi-institution physician survey and the study method was a survey of 250 general surgery program directors. This survey was identical to a published survey of OTO-HNS and a head-to-head comparison of results was performed. The response rate was 53% (133 programs). 89% of general surgery programs performed open tracheotomy on a regular basis. 75% performed percutaneous tracheotomy on a regular basis. 79% use the Ciaglia Blue Rhino method. Simultaneous video bronchoscopy was used by 67%. 83% of general surgery residency programs train their residents in PT. 61% felt that PT was either safer than or equal to open tracheotomy. PT is performed in a majority of general surgery residency programs and taught to their trainees. This is in contrast to otolaryngology residency programs, which have been shown to prefer open tracheotomies in both practice and teaching. This trend may severely impact the skills of the next generation of otolaryngologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldenberg D, Park SS, Carr M (2009) Percutaneous tracheotomy in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residency training programs. Laryngoscope 119(2):289–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldenberg D et al (2002) Tracheotomy: changing indications and a review of 1, 130 cases. J Otolaryngol 31(4):211–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blankenship DR et al (2004) Percutaneous tracheostomy: don’t beat them, join them. Laryngoscope 114(9):1517–1521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Donaldson DR, Emami AJ, Wax MK (2000) Endoscopically monitored percutaneous dilational tracheotomy in a residency program. Laryngoscope 110(7):1142–1146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldenberg D et al (2003) Percutaneous dilation tracheotomy versus surgical tracheotomy: our experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(3):358–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lim JW et al (2000) Experience with percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109(9):791–796

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang MB et al (1992) Early experience with percutaneous tracheotomy. Laryngoscope 102(2):157–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhatti N et al (2007) Reduction of complication rate in percutaneous dilation tracheostomies. Laryngoscope 117(1):172–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kost KM (2005) Endoscopic percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy: a prospective evaluation of 500 consecutive cases. Laryngoscope 115(10 Pt 2):1–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhatti N et al (2007) Percutaneous dilation tracheotomy in intensive care unit patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136(6):938–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Nalos M (2006) Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 10(2):R55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fikkers BG et al (2003) Tracheostomy for long-term ventilated patients: a postal survey of ICU practice in The Netherlands. Intensive Care Med 29(8):1390–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Freeman BD et al (2000) A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest 118(5):1412–1418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kluge S et al (2008) Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a nationwide survey. Anesth Analg 107(5):1639–1643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Krishnan K, Elliot SC, Mallick A (2005) The current practice of tracheostomy in the United Kingdom: a postal survey. Anaesthesia 60(4):360–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Silvester W et al (2006) Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: a randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up. Crit Care Med 34(8):2145–2152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Winkler WB et al (1994) Bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy with endoscopic guidance: experience with 71 ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 20(7):476–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Goldenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newhouse, E., Ondik, M.P., Carr, M. et al. Who is performing percutaneous tracheotomies? Practice patterns of surgeons in the USA. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268, 415–418 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1406-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1406-9

Keywords

Navigation