Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous wound infiltration system for postoperative pain management in gynecologic oncology patients

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Major open surgery for gynecologic cancer usually involves a long midline skin incision and induces severe postoperative surgical site pain (POSP) that may not be effectively controlled with the conventional management. We investigated whether combining a continuous wound infiltration system (CWIS, ON-Q PainBuster®) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) effectively decreases POSP, compared with IV PCA alone, in gynecologic oncology patients.

Methods

This retrospective study included 62 Korean patients who received a long midline skin incision during gynecologic cancer surgery. The combined therapy group (n = 31), which received CWIS (0.5% ropivacaine infused over 72 h) and IV PCA (fentanyl citrate), and the IV PCA only group (n = 31) were determined using 1:1 matching. POSP was assessed using resting numeric rating scale (NRS) scores measured for 96 h after surgery, which were analyzed using a linear mixed model.

Results

The slopes of the predicted NRS values from the linear mixed model were significantly different between the groups. Compared with the control group, the combined therapy group had lower predicted NRS scores for the first 72 h, but higher predicted scores between 72 and 96 h. Moreover, the mean NRS scores over the first 48 h postoperation were significantly lower in the combined therapy group than in the control group; the scores were similar in both groups during the remaining period. With the exception of a higher body mass index in the CWIS group, the other variables, such as the dosage and usage time of fentanyl citrate, use of additional painkillers, and side effects, including wound complications, did not differ between groups.

Conclusions

Combined therapy using CWIS and IV PCA may be a useful strategy for POSP management in gynecologic oncology patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferguson SE, Malhotra T, Seshan VE et al (2009) A prospective randomized trial comparing patient-controlled epidural analgesia to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain control and recovery after major open gynecologic cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol 114:111–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chung D, Lee YJ, Jo MH et al (2013) The ON-Q pain management system in elective gynecology oncologic surgery: Management of postoperative surgical site pain compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Obstet Gynecol Sci 56:93–101

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Azari L, Santoso JT, Osborne SE (2013) Optimal pain management in total abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 68:215–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen TF, Clarke N, Bowman R, Harper NJ, Payne SR (1994) Intermuscular bupivacaine infusion for control of pain after renal surgery: a preliminary report. Br J Urol 74:155–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Elder JB, Hoh DJ, Wang MY (2008) Postoperative continuous paravertebral anesthetic infusion for pain control in lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:210–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mecklem DW, Humphrey MD, Hicks RW (1995) Efficacy of bupivacaine delivered by wound catheter for post-Caesarean section analgesia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 35:416–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oderda G (2012) Challenges in the management of acute postsurgical pain. Pharmacotherapy 32:6s–11s

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Forastiere E, Sofra M, Giannarelli D, Fabrizi L, Simone G (2008) Effectiveness of continuous wound infusion of 0.5% ropivacaine by On-Q pain relief system for postoperative pain management after open nephrectomy. Br J Anaesth 101:841–847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fredman B, Shapiro A, Zohar E et al (2000) The analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled ropivacaine instillation after Cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 91:1436–1440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung F, Ritchie E, Su J (1997) Postoperative pain in ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 85:808–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalkman CJ, Visser K, Moen J, Bonsel GJ, Grobbee DE, Moons KG (2003) Preoperative prediction of severe postoperative pain. Pain 105:415–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schroeder K, Andrei AC, Furlong MJ, Donnelly MJ, Han S, Becker AM (2012) The perioperative effect of increased body mass index on peripheral nerve blockade: an analysis of 528 ultrasound guided interscalene blocks. Rev Bras Anestesiol 62:28–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Skinner HB (2004) Multimodal acute pain management. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 33:5–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schumann R, Jones SB, Ortiz VE et al (2005) Best practice recommendations for anesthetic perioperative care and pain management in weight loss surgery. Obes Res 13:254–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Garimella V, Cellini C (2013) Postoperative pain control. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 26:191–196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis SS, Moehring RW, Chen LF, Sexton DJ, Anderson DJ (2013) Assessing the relative burden of hospital-acquired infections in a network of community hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34:1229–1230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibrahim MI, Moustafa GF, Al-Hamid AS, Hussein MR (2014) Superficial incisional surgical site infection rate after cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial of subcuticular versus interrupted skin suturing. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:981–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Hop WC et al (2010) Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg 34:20–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Blikkendaal MD, Schepers EM, van Zwet EW, Twijnstra AR, Jansen FW (2015) Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:723–738

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hotta K, Inoue S, Taira K, Sata N, Tamai K, Takeuchi M (2016) Comparison of the analgesic effect between continuous wound infiltration and single-injection transversus abdominis plane block after gynecologic laparotomy. J Anesth 30:31–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bertoglio S, Fabiani F, Negri PD et al (2012) The postoperative analgesic efficacy of preperitoneal continuous wound infusion compared to epidural continuous infusion with local anesthetics after colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled multicenter study. Anesth Analg 115:1442–1450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kalogera E, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Weaver AL et al (2016) Abdominal incision injection of liposomal bupivacaine and opioid use after laparotomy for gynecologic malignancies. Obstet Gynecol 128:1009–1017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

BL: Manuscript writing, protocol/project development, data collection, and data analysis. KK: Protocol/project development, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript editing. SA: Data management and data analysis. HJS: Manuscript revising. DHS: Data collection. JHN: Protocol/project development and manuscript revising. YBK: Protocol/project development, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Beom Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was waived.

Additional information

B. Lee and K. Kim contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, B., Kim, K., Ahn, S. et al. Continuous wound infiltration system for postoperative pain management in gynecologic oncology patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295, 1219–1226 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4342-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4342-8

Keywords

Navigation