Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study is to compare vaginal hysterectomy performed with standard technique versus the one performed with LigaSure.
Methods
Observational-longitudinal-cohort study on 42 women candidates to vaginal hysterectomy because of benign uterine pathology. Outcome variables, methods of analysis, inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined prospectively. Eligible patients were subdivided in Group-A (LigaSure-21 patients), or in Group-B (classical-21 patients). Group-A was divided into Subgroup-A1 (10 patients) and Subgroup-A2 (11 patients), depending on the point where the stump of the uterosacral-ligament was transfixed: Subgroup-A1 at cervical portion, Subgroup-A2 at intermediate portion. For all patients were reported: pre-post surgery haemoglobin and hematocrit, number of sutures, duration of intervention and blood loss, NRS-score on first/third post-operative days. All patients underwent gynaecological examination 30 and 180 days after surgery.
Results
General characteristics did not show significant differences between the two groups. Statistically significant differences emerged from the comparison between Group-A versus Group-B in terms of: intraoperative bleeding, post-operative value of haemoglobin, Δ-Hb, number of sutures, surgical time, pain at first and third post-operative day. The 180 days follow-up demonstrated four cases of vaginal vault prolapse, only in the Subgroup-A1 related to thermal damage of the uterosacral ligament.
Conclusion
LigaSure vessel sealing system is a safe alternative for securing pedicles in vaginal hysterectomy with significant improvement in patients outcome. Following vaginal vault prolapse, we determined the optimal fixation-site to perform the colposuspension in the intermediate portion of the uterosacral-ligament, especially if the cervical portion received a thermal damage, as occurs during the LigaSure use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kovac SR (2000) Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications. Obstet Gynecol 95:787–793
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444 (2009) Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 114(5):1156–1158
Silva-Filho AL, Rodrigues AM, Vale de Castro Monteiro M et al (2009) Randomized study of bipolar vessel sealing system versus conventional suture ligature for vaginal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 146(2):200–203
Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A et al (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3): CD003677
Levy B, Emery L (2003) Randomized trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 102(1):147–151
Ding Z, Wable M, Rane A (2005) Use of LigaSure bipolar diathermy system in vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynaecol 25(1):49–51
Newcomb WL, Hope WW, Schmelzer TM et al (2009) Comparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices. Surg Endosc 23(1):90–96
Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, Chandler JG (1998) High-burst strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc 12:876–878
Peirce SC, Edwards SD, Hedges A, Crawford DC (2007) Evidence review, electrosurgical vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy. Centre for evidence-based purchasing. NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency (CEP 07019); 2007. http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/Documents/443/CEP07019_ESVS%20in%20Vaginal%20Hysterectomy.pdf. Accessed Jun 2009
Saiura A, Yamamoto J, Koga R et al (2006) Usefulness of LigaSure for liver resection: analysis by randomized clinical trial. Am J Surg 192(1):41–45
Macario A, Dexter F, Sypal J, Cosgriff N, Heniford BT (2008) Operative time and other outcomes of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (LigaSure) versus other methods for surgical hemostasis: a meta-analysis. Surg Innov 15(4):284–291
Baden WB, Walker T (1992) Fundamentals, symptoms and classification. In: Baden WB, Walker T (eds) Surgical repair of vaginal defects. JB Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, p 9
Doumouchtsis SK, Khunda A, Jeffery ST, Franco AV, Fynes MM (2011) Long-term outcomes of modified high uterosacral ligament vault suspension (HUSLS) at vaginal hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J 22(5):577–584
Vu D, Haylen BT, Tse K, Farnsworth A (2010) Surgical anatomy of the uterosacral ligament. Int Urogynecol J 21(9):1123–1128
Yaman C, Ebner T, Jesacher K, Obermayr G, Pölz W, Tews G (2002) Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound endometrial volume measurements in patients with postmenopausal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19(3):282–286
Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L (2000) Three methods for hysterectomy: A randomized, prospective study of short term outcome. BJOG 107:1380–1385
Elhao M, Abdallah K, Serag I, El-Laithy M, Agur W (2009) Efficacy of using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in patients with different degrees of operative difficulty: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 147(1):86–90
Hefni MA, Bhaumik J, El-Toukhy T et al (2005) Safety and efficacy of using the LigaSure vessel sealing system for securing the pedicles in vaginal hysterectomy: randomised controlled trial. BJOG 112(3):329–333
Cronjé HS, de Coning EC (2005) Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 91(3):243–245
Tamussino K, Afschar P, Reuss J, Perschler M, Ralph G, Winter R (2005) Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing for radical abdominal hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 96(2):320–322
Mistrangelo E, Febo G, Ferrero B, Ferrero S, Deltetto F, Camanni M (2008) Safety and efficacy of vaginal hysterectomy in the large uterus with the LigaSure bipolar diathermy system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(5):475.e1–475.e5
Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GW, Krueger Sullivan L, Schön Ybarra MA, Bent AE (2001) Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety. Obstet Gynecol 97(6):873–879
Landman J, Kerbl K, Rehman J et al (2003) Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. J Urol 169(2):697–700
Person B, Vivas DA, Ruiz D, Talcott M, Coad JE, Wexner SD (2008) Comparison of four energy-based vascular sealing and cutting instruments: a porcine model. Surg Endosc 22(2):534–538
Noble EJ, Smart NJ, Challand C, Sleigh K, Oriolowo A, Hosie KB (2011) Experimental comparison of mesenteric vessel sealing and thermal damage between one bipolar and two ultrasonic shears devices. Br J Surg 98(6):797–800
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all Gynaecologists who helped in collecting data. The Authors thank all Anaesthesiologists for their precious contribute in performing the study. All authors declare they have no funding.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gizzo, S., Burul, G., Di Gangi, S. et al. LigaSure vessel sealing system in vaginal hysterectomy: safety, efficacy and limitations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288, 1067–1074 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2857-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2857-1