Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Social determinants of health associated with cervical cancer screening among women living in developing countries: a scoping review

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Thousands of women living in many middle and low-income countries are unnecessarily dying from cervical cancer, partly due to limited screening coverage.

Objectives

To identify social determinants of health (SDH) associated with cervical screening for women living in middle and low-income countries, to inform responses to improve SDH and screening coverage, and to identify research gaps.

Methods

A scoping literature review. We located original research articles on SDH associated with cervical cancer screening through bibliographic databases, supplemented by hand searching (n = 166 + 4). Included were those conducted in middle and low-income countries and published in English, Portuguese and Spanish academic journals between January 2000 and June 2011 (n = 37). Excluded were those from high-income countries or focusing on screening-diagnostic techniques or HPV vaccine. Narrative synthesis examined the results in relation to a SDH framework.

Results

A number of factors influence access along the pathway to cervical cancer screening. Structural (cultural and societal values, socioeconomic position, ethnicity), intermediary (geographic location, health seeking behaviours, psychosocial factors, nature of the health system), and cross-cutting (social cohesion) SDH were all important. No single factor could entirely explain the observed cervical screening patterns.

Conclusion

Cervical cancer screening among women living in middle and low-income countries are influenced by the interaction among several different SDH. The majority of researchers studying cervical cancer screening focused on exploring single socio-demographic variables, which is typical of positivist, biomedical and epidemiological research. An inter-sectionality approach may provide a richer understanding of the complexities that influence women’s pathways to cervical cancer screening and assist design of international programmes and policies from a social justice perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arrossi A, Sankaranarayanan R, Parkin DM (2003) Incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Latin America. Salud Púlica México 45:s306–s314

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Atomic Energy Agency (2011) Inequality in cancer care: a global perspective. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F et al (2010) GLOBOCAN 2008, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 [Internet]. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr

  4. Parikh A, Brennan P, Boffetta P (2003) Meta-analysis of social inequality and the risk of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 105:687–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization (2009) Women and health: today’s evidence, tomorrow’s agenda. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  6. Raphael D (2006) Social determinants of health: present status, unanswered questions, and future directions. Int J Health Serv 3694:651–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Navarro V, Muntaner C (eds) (2004) Political and economic determinants of population health and well-being: controversies and developments. Baywood Publishing Company, Amityville

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martmot M, Wilkinson RG (2006) Social determinants of health. Oxford University Press Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization (2008) The world health report 2008: primary healthcare now more than ever. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization (2010) A conceptual framework for actions on the social determinants of health: social determinants of health discussion paper 2, debates, policy & practice, case studies. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luciani S, Andrus J (2008) A Pan American Health Organization strategy for cervical cancer prevention and control in Latin America and the Caribbean. Reprod Health Matters 16:59–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Drain PK, Holmes KK, Hughes JP et al (2002) Determinants of cervical cancer rates in developing countries. Int J Cancer 100:199–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsu V, Levin C (2008) Making the case for cervical cancer prevention: what about equity? Reprod Health Matters 16:104–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Method 8:19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. World Bank (2011) Country and lending groups [World Bank web site]. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/country-and-lending-groups. 30 June 2011

  16. Thorne S (2000) Data analysis in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs 3:68–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abotchie PN, Shok NK (2009) Cervical cancer screening among college student in Ghana: knowledge and health beliefs. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19:412–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ansink AC, Tolhurst R, Haque R (2008) Cervical cancer in Bangladesh: community perceptions of cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 102:499–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gichangi P, Estambale B, Bwayo J et al (2003) Knowledge and practice about cervical cancer and Pap smear testing among patients at Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya. Int J Gynecol Cancer 13:827–833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Amarin ZO, Badria LF, Obeidat BR (2008) Attitudes and beliefs about cervical smear testing in ever-married Jordanian women. East Mediterr Health J 14:389–397

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Basu P, Sarkar S, Mukherjee S et al (2006) Women’s perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical cancer screening: results from a population based study in India. Cancer Detect Prev 30:369–374

    Google Scholar 

  22. Claeys P, Gibzalez C, Gonzalez M et al (2002) Determinants of cervical cancer screening in a poor area: results of a population-based survey in Rivas, Nicaragua. Trop Med Int Health 7:935–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gu A, Chan CWH, Twinn S (2010) How sexual history and knowledge of cervical cancer and screening influence Chinese women’s screening behavior in mainland China. Cancer Nurs 33:445–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin SJ (2008) Factors influencing the uptake of screening services for breast and cervical cancer in Taiwan. J R Soc Promot Health 128:327–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nene B, Jayant K, Arossi S et al (2007) Determinants of women’s participation in cervical cancer screening trial, Maharashtra, India. Bull World Health Organ 85:264–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tung WC, Lu M, Cook D (2010) Cervical cancer screening among Taiwanese women: a transtheoretical approach. Oncol Nurs Forum 37:E288–E294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tung WC, Lu M, Cook D (2010) Papanicolaou screening in Taiwan: perceived barriers and self-efficacy. Health Care Women Int 31:421–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vastbinder MB, Castillo C, Bekkers RLM (2010) Barriers to follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears among women in Leon, Nicaragua. Trop Dr 40:22–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Aguto I, Bishop A, Sánchez et al (2004) Perceived barriers and benefits to cervical cancer screening in Latin America. Prev Med 39:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gakidou E, Nordhagen S, Obermeyer Z (2008) Coverage of cervical cancer screening in 57 countries: low average and large inequities. PLos Med 5:0863–0868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Reyes-Ortiz CA, Velez LF, Camacho ME et al (2008) Health insurance and cervical cancer screening among older women in Latin America and Caribbean cities. Int J Epidemiol 37:870–878

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Al-Naggar R, Low WY, Isa Z (2010) Knowledge and barriers towards cervical cancer screening among young women in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 11:867–873

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Amorim V, Barros M, César C et al (2006) Fatores associados á não realização do exame de Papanicolaou: um estudo de base populacional no Município de Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 22:2329–2338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Castro-Jiménez M, Londoño-Cuellar P, Vera-Cala L (2006) Asistencia a citología del cuello uterino y sus determinantes en una población rural Colombiana 1998–1999. Rev Salud Pública 8:248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cuesta DIL, Gutiérrez LFG (2004) Accesibilidad a los servicios de salud en la práctica de citología reciente de cuello uterino en una zona urbana de Colombia. Rev Esp Salud Pública 78:367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. de Quadros CAT, Victoria CG, da Costa SD (2004) Coverage and focus of a cervical cancer prevention program in southern Brazil. Pan Am J Public Health 16:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dunn RA, Tan AKG (2010) Cervical cancer screening in Malaysia: are targeted interventions necessary? Soc Sci Med 71:1089–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fernandes JV, Rodrigues SHL, da Costa YGAS et al (2009) Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to Pap smear test in Northeastern Brazil. Rev Sáude Pública 43:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  39. Francis SA, Nelson J, Liverpool J et al (2010) Examining attitudes and knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer risk among female clinic attendees in Johannesburg, South Africa. Vaccine 28:8023–8026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gamarra CJ, Paz EPA, Griep RH (2009) Social support and cervical and breast cancer screening in Argentinean women from rural population. Public Health Nurs 26:269–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kesic V, Markovic M, Matejic B et al (2005) Awareness of cervical cancer screening among women in Serbia. Gynecol Oncol 99:S222–S225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lartey M, Joubert G, Cronje HS (2003) Knowledge, attitudes and practices of rural women in South Africa regarding the Pap smear. Int J Gynecol Obstet 83:315–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Markovic M, Kesic V, Topic L et al (2005) Barriers to cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study with women in Serbia. Soc Sci Med 61:2528–2535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. McFarland DM (2003) Cervical cancer and Pap smear screening in Botswana: knowledge and perceptions. Int Nurs Rev 50:167–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Moreira ED, Oliveira BG, Ferraz FM et al (2006) Knowledge and attitudes about human papillomavirus, Pap smears, and cervical cancer among young women in Brazil: implications for health education and prevention. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16:599–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Paz Soldan VA, Lee FH, Carcamo C et al (2008) Who is getting Pap smears in urban Peru? Int J Epidemiol 37:862–869

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rafael R, de Moura ATMS (2010) Barreiras na realização da colpocitologia oncótica: um inquétito domiciliar na área de abrangência de Saúde da família de Nova Iguaçu, Rio de Janeiro, brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 26:1045–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Todorova I, Baban A, Alexandrova-Karamanova A et al (2009) Inequalities in cervical cancer screening in Eastern Europe: perspectives from Bulgaria and Romania. Int J Public Health 54:222–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Watkins MM, Gabali C, Winkleby M et al (2002) Barriers to cervical cancer screening in rural Mexico. Int J Gynecol Cancer 12:475–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wellensiek N, Moodley M, Moodley M et al (2002) Knowledge of cervical cancer screening and use of cervical cancer facilities among women from various socioeconomic backgrounds in Durban Kwazulu Natal, South Africa. Int J Gynecol Cancer 12:376–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Wiesner C, Cendales R, Murillo R et al (2010) Seguimento fe mujers con anormalidad citológica de cuello uterino, en Colombia. Rev Salud Pública 12:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wiesner-Ceballos C, Vejarano-Velandia M, Caicedo-Mera JC et al (2006) La citología de cuello uterino en Soacha, Colombia: representaciones sociales, barreras y motivaciones. Rev Salud Pública 8:185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Winkler J, Bingham A, Coffey P et al (2008) Women’s participation in a cervical cancer screening program in northern Peru. Health Educ Res 23:10–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Wilkinson R (2005) The impact of inequality: how to make sick societies healthier. The New York Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wilkinson R, Marmot M (2003) Social support. In: Wilkinson R, Marmot M (eds) Social determinants of health: the solid facts, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, Copenhagen, pp 22–23

    Google Scholar 

  56. Weber L (2006) Reconstructing the landscape of health disparities research: promoting dialogue and collaboration between feminist intersectional and biomedical paradigms. In: Schulz A, Mullings L (eds) Gender, race, class & health: intersectional approaches. Wiley, San Francisco, pp 21–59

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hankivsky O, Christoffersen A (2008) Intersectionality and the determinants of health: a Canadian perspective. Crit Public Health 18:271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Cramer EP, Plummer SB (2009) People of color with disabilities: intersectionality as a framework for analyzing intimate partner violence in social, historical and political contexts. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma 18:162–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hankivsky O, Reid C, Cormier R et al (2010) Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women’s health research. Int J Equity Health 2010(9):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  60. Van herk K, Smith D, Andrew C (2011) Examining our privileges and oppressions: incorporating an intersectionality paradigm into nursing. Nurs Inquiry 18:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Brotman S, Ryan B (2004) An intersectionality approach to queer health policy and practice: two-spirit people in Canada. Can Divers 2004(3):59–64

    Google Scholar 

  62. Dick S, Varcoe C (2004) Violence against women and substance use in rural context. Vis BC’s Ment Health Addict J 2:15–16

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hallgrimsdottir H, Phillips R, Benoit C et al (2008) Sporting girls, streetwalkers, and inmates of houses of ill-repute: media narratives and the historical mutability of prostitution stigmas. Sociol Perspect 51:119–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Shumka L, Benoit C (2008) Social suffering and the identification of gaps in primary health care for vulnerable women. Res Sociol Health Care 25:255–278

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Denise Gastaldo

  2. Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Rm 18-727, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada

    Leslie Williams-Brennan

  3. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Donald C. Cole

  4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Lawrence Paszat

Authors
  1. Leslie Williams-Brennan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Denise Gastaldo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Donald C. Cole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lawrence Paszat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie Williams-Brennan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams-Brennan, L., Gastaldo, D., Cole, D.C. et al. Social determinants of health associated with cervical cancer screening among women living in developing countries: a scoping review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286, 1487–1505 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2575-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2575-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation