Abstract
Objective
To compare the failure rate (pregnancies) of a Pomeroy procedure and Filshie clips tubal occlusion at the time of Caesarean section.
Method
This is a retrospective observational study done in a district general hospital in the UK. There were 290 sterilisations performed at the time of Caesarean section over the period of 1994–2007. Studied population included 203 Pomeroy procedures and 87 Filshie clips applications. Follow-up period ranged from 2 to 15 years. A birth register and an operating theatre database were used to identify patients who underwent Caesarean section with a tubal occlusion. These patients’ names were checked against the antenatal booking database, the early pregnancy assessment unit database, the operating theatre database in case of ectopic pregnancies, and a termination of pregnancy database to recognise failed sterilisation.
Results
There was no failure of tubal occlusion with a Pomeroy procedure (0/203). The failure rate of Filshie clips tubal occlusion was 1.15% (1/87) (p = 0.3). The length of the follow-up period ranged from 2 to 15 years (for Pomeroy procedure, median was 9 years and inter-quartile range (IQR) was 7; for Filshie clip, median was 8 years and IQR was 7).
Conclusion
Pomeroy technique appears to carry a lower risk of a failed sterilisation than Filshie clips tubal occlusion at the time of Caesarean section. However, Pomeroy procedure needs to be balanced against the speed and simplicity of Filshie clips tubal occlusion.
References
United Nations, Department of Economic, Social Affairs, Population Division (1998) Levels and trends of contraceptive use as assessed in 1998. United Nations, New York
Rowlands S, Hannaford P (2003) The incidence of sterilisation in the UK. BJOG 110:4–819
Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM, Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussell J (1996) The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. collaborative review of sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:1161–1168
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2004) Male and female sterilisation. Evidence-based clinical guideline number 4. London. ISBN 1-900364-93-X
Chi IC, Siemens AJ, Champion CB, Gates D, Cilenti D (1987) Pregnancy following mini-laparotomy tubal sterilization: an update of an international data set. Contraception 35:171–178
Kohaut BA, Musselman BL, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM (2004) Randomized trial to compare perioperative outcomes of Filshie clip vs. Pomeroy technique for postpartum and intraoperative cesarean tubal sterilization: a pilot study. Contraception 69(4):267–270
Nardin JM, Kulier R, Boulvain M (2002) Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4): CD003034. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003034
Yan J-S, Hsu J, Yin CS (1990) Comparative study of Filshie clip and Pomeroy method for postpartum sterilization. Int J Gynecol Obstet 33:263–267
Conflict of interest statement
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oligbo, N., Revicky, V. & Udeh, R. Pomeroy technique or Filshie clips for postpartum sterilisation? Retrospective study on comparison between Pomeroy procedure and Filshie clips for a tubal occlusion at the time of Caesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281, 1073–1075 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1314-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1314-7