Abstract
Objective
To investigate the differences in steroid receptor expression patterns between glandular and stromal portions in endometrial polyps among premenopausal and postmenopausal patients and the relationship between the receptor expression in endometrial polyps and clinical parameters.
Materials and methods
A total of 25 postmenopausal and 25 premenopausal patients with solitary endometrial polyp detected by office hysteroscopy were involved in the study. All patients underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy under general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia. Estrogen and progesterone expression patterns were investigated in the polyps using immunohistochemistry. The mean age was 57.6 years in postmenopausal patients and 36.9 in premenopausal patients. Average gravida, body mass index (BMI), and frequency of smokers did not differ between groups. However, the patient’s age and their concomitant diseases were significantly different between premenopausal and postmenopausal patients (P = 0.01).
Results
Comparison in postmenopausal patients showed that glandular estrogen and progesterone receptor expression were both significantly greater than stromal estrogen and progesterone receptor expression (P = 0.037 and <0.001, respectively). Proliferative phase endometrial polyps also demonstrated significantly greater expression of progesterone receptors in glandular epithelium compared with stroma (P = 0.019). However, stromal and glandular estrogen receptor expression did not differ among premenopausal patients. There was a statistically significant correlation among stromal progesterone receptor expression, plasma estrogen and FSH level (P = 0.01). A negative correlation was found between stromal progesterone receptor expression and patient’s age (P = 0. 01).
Conclusion
Estrogen and progesterone receptor expression were lower in the stromal portion of the endometrial polyp than in the glandular portion in postmenopausal patients. Stromal progesterone receptor expression was lower in older patients and there was a relation between low estrogen hormone levels and lower stromal progesterone receptor expression.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McGurgan P, Taylor LJ, Duffy SR, O’Donovan PJ (2006) Are endometrial polyps from pre-menopausal women similar to post-menopausal women? An immunohistochemical comparison of endometrial polyps from pre- and post-menopausal women. Maturitas 54(3):277–284
Nuovo MA, Nuovo GJ, McCaffrey RM, Levine RU, Barron B, Winkler B (1989) Endometrial polyps in postmenopausal patients receiving tamoxifen. Int J Gynecol Pathol 8(2):125–131
Fox H, Buckley H (eds) (1998) Gynaecological and obstetric pathology for the MRCOG. RCOG Press, London
Reslova T, Tosner J, Resl M, Kugler R, Vavrova I (1999) Endometrial polyps. A clinical study of 245 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 262(3/4):133–139
Lopes RG, Baracat EC, de Albuquerque Neto LC, Ramos JF, Yatabe S, Depesr DB, Lippi UG (2007) Analysis of estrogen- and progesterone-receptor expression in endometrial polyps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:300–303
Mittal K, Schwartz L, Goswami S, Denopoulos R (1996) Estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in endometrial polyps. Int J Gynecol Pathol 15:345–348
Belisario MS, Vassallo J, Andrade LA, Alvarenga M, Pinto GA, Monteiro IM (2006) The expression of the hormone receptors in the endometrium and endometrial polyps in postmenopausal women and its relationship to body mass index. Maturitas 53:114–118
Sant’Ana de Almeida EC, Nogueira AA, Candido dos Reis FJ, Zambelli Ramalho LN, Zucoloto S (2004) Immunohistochemical expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in endometrial polyps and adjacent endometrium in postmenopausal women. Maturitas 49:229–233
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gul, A., Ugur, M., Iskender, C. et al. Immunohistochemical expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in endometrial polyps and its relationship to clinical parameters. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281, 479–483 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1142-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1142-9