Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Onychomycosis in underrepresented groups: an all of us database analysis

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few research studies evaluating the impact of dermatologic diseases in the United States (US) have adequately included underrepresented groups. All of Us (AoU) is an ongoing precision medicine-based research initiative by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) that facilitates research in populations traditionally underrepresented in biomedical research by prioritizing them for data collection. Our objective was to evaluate the burden of onychomycosis in underrepresented groups defined by the framework provided by AoU. The AoU Registered Tier dataset version 5 was used which includes data collected between May 30, 2017 and April 1, 2021. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis linking survey and electronic health record (EHR) data to estimate the prevalence of onychomycosis in underrepresented groups defined by race, ethnicity, age (≥ 75 years), disability, sexual orientation/gender identity (LGBTQIA +), income (annual household income ≤ $35 000) and education (less than a high school degree). The latest All of Us data release includes 329,038 participants. Of these, 251,597 (76%) had EHR data and 13,874 had onychomycosis (overall prevalence, 5.5%; 95% CI, 5.4–5.6). Multivariate analyses adjusted by tinea pedis, diabetes mellitus, immune compromise, nail psoriasis, and insurance status, in addition to the aforementioned variables, revealed that, compared with White participants, Black and Hispanic participants had a higher adjusted odds of onychomycosis (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23–1.36 and OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.17–1.31, respectively). Higher adjusted odds of onychomycosis were also observed in underrepresented groups. Our findings suggest a disproportionately high burden of onychomycosis in underrepresented groups, although further studies are needed to replicate our findings and address this disparity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Availability of data and materials

Datasets related to this article can be found at https://allofus.nih.gov, hosted at the National Institutes of Health All of Research Program All of Us Research Program.” National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, https://allofus.nih.gov/.

References

  1. Kaur R, Kashyap B, Bhalla P (2008) Onychomycosis-epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Indian J Med Microbiol 26:108–116. https://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.40522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta AK et al (2000) Prevalence and epidemiology of onychomycosis in patients visiting physicians’ offices: a multicenter Canadian survey of 15,000 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 43:244–248. https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2000.104794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta AK et al (1997) Prevalence and epidemiology of unsuspected onychomycosis in patients visiting dermatologists’ offices in Ontario, Canada-a multicenter survey of 2001 patients. Int J Dermatol 36:783–787. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.1997.00349.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elewski BE, Charif MA (1997) Prevalence of onychomycosis in patients attending a dermatology clinic in northeastern Ohio for other conditions. Arch Dermatol 133:1172–1173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vender RB, Lynde CW, Poulin Y (2006) Prevalence and epidemiology of onychomycosis. J Cutan Med Surg. https://doi.org/10.2310/7750.2006.00056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Investigators AOURP (2019) The “All of Us” research program. New Eng J Med. 381(7):668–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Health, N.I.o., The All of Us research program initial protocol. 2017, August.

  8. Welsh O, Vera-Cabrera L (2014) Onychomycosis. Clin Dermatol 28:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayo T, Cantrell W (2014) Putting onychomycosis under the microscope. Nurse Pract 39:8–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPR.0000444656.40636.00

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adams C, Athanasoula E, Lee W, Mahmudova N, Vlahovic TC (2015) Environmental and genetic factors on the development of onychomycosis. J Fungi 1:211–216. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof1020211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Panackal AA, Halpern EF, Watson AJ (2009) Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: analysis of the national ambulatory medical care survey (NAMCS) and national hospital ambulatory medical care survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004. Int J Dermatol 48:704–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04025.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the data acquisition and analysis and the preparation of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Moseley.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moseley, I., Ragi, S.D., Ouellette, S. et al. Onychomycosis in underrepresented groups: an all of us database analysis. Arch Dermatol Res 315, 647–651 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02413-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02413-4

Keywords

Navigation