Abstract
Introduction
When locking intramedullary nails, inserting the distal interlocking screw accurately and quickly with less radiation exposure is very important. The purpose of this randomized control study was to compare radiation exposure and accuracy of distal locking screws between free-hand fluoroscopic guidance and the use of a distal targeting system (DTS).
Materials and methods
Inclusion criteria of this study were patients older than 60 years who need an intramedullary nailing due to unstable intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture. The primary outcome was the attempt numbers of image intensifier during the insertion of distal locking screws. Secondary outcomes were operative time and angles between distal locking screws and nail.
Results
A total of 36 patients participated in the study. Eighteen patients using free-hand fluoroscopic guidance were assigned to Group I while 18 patients using DTS were assigned to Group II. The number of attempts of image intensifier during distal screw insertion (57.3 ± 31.42 vs. 11.5 ± 7.41, p < 0.001), ratio of attempt number for distal screws to the total attempts (0.33 ± 0.21 vs. 0.12 ± 0.08, p = 0.001), the number of hand exposure to image intensifier directly (75.0 ± 29.55 vs. 13.5 ± 19.07, p < 0.001), and the time of radiation exposure during distal screws insertion (42.57 ± 2.42 s vs. 12.72 ± 8.10 s, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in Group II compared to those in Group I. And, operation time (96.3 min ± 18.94 vs. 76.1 min ± 14.10, p < 0.001) was also statistically significantly lower in Group II. Both distal locking screws were significantly closer to perpendicular direction to the nail in Group II.
Conclusion
The attempt number of image intensifier during the insertion of two distal locking screws was significantly reduced with DTS compared with that with free hand fluoroscopic guidance. Angle between distal locking screws and nail was also more accurate using DTS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Choi YJ, Oh HJ, Kim DJ et al (2012) The prevalence of osteoporosis in Korean adults aged 50 years or older and the higher diagnosis rates in women who were beneficiaries of a national screening program: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2009. J Bone Miner Res 27:1879–1886. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1635
Shin CS, Choi HJ, Kim MJ et al (2010) Prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in Korea: a community-based cohort study with lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density. Bone 47:378–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.03.017
Lee Y-K, Yoon B-H, Koo K-H (2013) Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in South Korea. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 28:90–93. https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2013.28.2.90
Ahn S-K, Kam S, Chun B-Y (2014) Incidence of and factors for self-reported fragility fractures among middle-aged and elderly women in rural Korea: an 11-year follow-up study. J Prev Med Public Health 47:289–297. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.14.020
Hong W, Cheng Q, Zhu X et al (2015) Prevalence of sarcopenia and its relationship with sites of fragility fractures in elderly chinese men and women. PLoS One 10:e0138102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138102
Ha Y-C, Park Y-G, Nam KW, Kim S-R (2015) Trend in hip fracture incidence and mortality in Korea: a prospective cohort study from 2002 to 2011. J Korean Med Sci 30:483–488. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.4.483
Kang H-Y, Yang K, Kim YN et al (2010) Incidence and mortality of hip fracture among the elderly population in South Korea: a population-based study using the national health insurance claims data. BMC Public Health 10:230. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-230
Kim S-R, Ha Y-C, Kim J-R et al (2010) Incidence of hip fractures in Jeju Island, South Korea: a prospective study (2002–2006). Clin Orthop Surg 2:64–68. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2010.2.2.64
Park Y-G, Jang S, Ha Y-C (2014) Incidence, morbidity and mortality in patients older than 50 years with second hip fracture in a jeju cohort study. Hip Pelvis 26:250–255. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2014.26.4.250
Wu X, Yang M, Wu L, Niu W (2015) A biomechanical comparison of two intramedullary implants for subtrochanteric fracture in two healing stages: a finite element analysis. Appl Bionics Biomech 2015:1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/475261
Kummer FJ, Olsson O, Pearlman CA et al (1998) Intramedullary versus extramedullar fixation of subtrochanteric fractures: a biomechanical study. Acta Orthop Scand 69:580–584. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679808999259
Hsu W-E, Yu C-H, Chang C-J, et al (2018) C-arm image-based surgical path planning method for distal locking of intramedullary nails. In: applied bionics and biomechanics. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/abb/2018/4530386/. Accessed 2 Oct 2018
Tasbas BA, Yagmurlu MF, Bayrakci K et al (2003) Which one is at risk in intraoperative fluoroscopy? Assistant surgeon or orthopaedic surgeon? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123:242–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0516-x
O’Rourke PJ, Crerand S, Harrington P, et al (1996) Risks of radiation exposure to orthopaedic surgeons. J R Coll Surg Edinb 41:40–43
Kaplan DJ, Patel JN, Liporace FA, Yoon RS (2016) Intraoperative radiation safety in orthopaedics: a review of the ALARA (As low as reasonably achievable) principle. Patient Saf Surg. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-016-0115-8
Anastopoulos G, Ntagiopoulos PG, Chissas D et al (2008) Evaluation of the stryker S2 IM nail distal targeting device for reduction of radiation exposure: a case series study. Injury 39:1210–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.04.020
Brecher ME, Monk T, Goodnough LT (1997) A standardized method for calculating blood loss. Transfusion 37:1070–1074
Han B, Shi Z, Fu Y et al (2017) Comparison of free-hand fluoroscopic guidance and electromagnetic navigation in distal locking of femoral intramedullary nails. Med (Baltim). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007450
Krettek C, Könemann B, Miclau T et al (1998) A new mechanical aiming device for the placement of distal interlocking screws in femoral nails. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:147–152
Veliceasa B, Bandac R, Popescu D, et al (2015) Evaluation of TRIGEN SURESHOT® distal targeting system—a new electromagnetic computer-assisted guidance system. In: 2015 E-health and bioengineering conference (EHB), pp 1–4
Gausden EB, Christ AB, Zeldin R et al (2017) Tracking cumulative radiation exposure in orthopaedic surgeons and residents: what dose are we getting? J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:1324–1329. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01557
Shim DM, Kim YM, Oh SK et al (2014) Radiation induced hand necrosis of an orthopaedic surgeon who had treated a patient with fluoroscopy-guided spine injection. J Korean Orthop Assoc 49:250. https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2014.49.3.250
Anastopoulos G, Ntagiopoulos PG, Chissas D et al (2008) Distal locking of tibial nails. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:216–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0036-z
Vopat BG, Kane PM, Mansuripur PK et al (2015) The effects of distal interlocking screws on torsional stability in three-part intertrochanteric hip fractures. Springerplus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1196-z
Funding
There is no funding source.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. The design and protocol of this study were approved by the institutional review board of Gyeongsang Medical University (GNUH-2017–06-008–003).
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoo, JI., Jeong, H., Na, J. et al. Comparison of intraoperative radiation exposure with and without use of distal targeting device: a randomized control study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139, 1579–1586 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03238-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03238-z