Abstract
Introduction
This study was a systematic review comparing the clinical outcomes of using the transtibial (TT) versus the outside-in (OI) technique for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Materials and methods
A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple databases, including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. All databases were searched from the earliest records through August 2017 using the following Boolean operators: transtibial AND (outside-in OR out-in OR two incisions) AND anterior cruciate ligament. All prospective and retrospective controlled trials were retrieved that directly compared physical examination and knee function scores and patient-rated outcomes between the TT and OI techniques.
Results
Four prospective and three retrospective articles were identified by the search, and the findings suggested that the OI was superior to the TT technique for preparing the femoral tunnel based on the pivot shift test (p = 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grades, IKDC scores, Lysholm scores, Tegner scores, or the Lachman test.
Conclusions
No statistically significant differences were found in clinical functional results when comparing patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with the TT or OI techniques. However, the OI technique was found to be advantageous in conferring increased rotational stability as revealed by the pivot shift test. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to make more precise conclusions.
Level of evidence
Therapeutic study (systematic review), Level III.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Emond CE, Woelber EB, Kurd SK, Ciccotti MG, Cohen SB (2011) A comparison of the results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bioabsorbable versus metal interference screws a meta-analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93(6):572–580
Csintalan RP, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT (2008) Incidence rate of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Perm J 12:17–21
Steiner M (2009) Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc 17(4):247–251
Marchant BG, Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Fleckenstein C (2010) Prevalence of nonanatomical graft placement in a series of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 38:1987–1996
Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Refshauge K, Kader D, Connolly C, Linklater J, Pinczewski LA (2006) Long-term outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft: minimum 13-year review. Am J Sports Med 34:721–732
Graf BK, Henry J, Rothenberg M et al (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon. An ex vivo study of wear-related damage and failure at the femoral tunnel. Am J Sports Med 22:131–135
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269
Higgins JPT, Green S (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews for intervention. Version 5.0.0:180 (updated February 2008) The Cochrane Collaboration
Matassi F, Sirleo L, Carulli C et al (2015) Anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: transtibial versus outside-in technique: SIGASCOT Best Paper Award Finalist 2014. Joints 3(1):6–14
Monaco E, Fabbri M, Redler A et al (2017) In-out versus out-in technique for ACL reconstruction: a prospective clinical and radiological comparison. J Orthop Traumatol 18:335 (Epub ahead of print)
Cury RPL, Sprey JWC, Bragatto ALL et al (2017) Comparative evaluation of the results of three techniques in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, with a minimum follow-up of two years. Rev Bras Ortop 52(3):319–324
Brandsson S, Faxén E, Eriksson BI et al (1999) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: comparison of outside-in and all-inside techniques. Br J Sports Med 33(1):42–45
Yanasse RH, Lima AA, Antoniassi RS et al (2016) Transtibial technique versus two incisions in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: tunnel positioning, isometricity and functional evaluation. Rev Bras Ortop 51(3):274–281
Ahn JH, Lee YS, Jeong HJ et al (2017) Comparison of transtibial and retrograde outside-in techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in terms of graft nature and clinical outcomes: a case control study using 3T MRI. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(3):357–365
Suruga M, Horaguchi T, Iriuchishima T, Yahagi Y, Iwama G, Tokuhashi Y, Aizawa S (2017 Aug) Morphological size evaluation of the mid-substance insertion areas and the fan-like extension fibers in the femoral ACL footprint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(8):1107–1113
Robin BN, Jani SS, Marvil SC et al (2015) Advantages and disadvantages of transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in femoral tunnel drilling in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: asystematic review. Arthroscopy 31(7):1412–1417
Osaki K, Okazaki K, Matsubara H, Kuwashima U, Murakami K, Iwamoto Y (2015) Asymmetry in femoral tunnel socket length during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transportal, outside-in, and modified transtibial techniques. Arthroscopy 31(12):2365–70.19
Zhu M, Li S, Su Z, Zhou X, Peng P, Li J, Wang J, Lin L (2018) Tibial tunnel placement in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison study of outcomes between patient-specific drill template versus conventional arthroscopic techniques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (Epub ahead of print)
Heming JF, Rand J, Steiner ME (2007) Anatomical limitations of transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35(10):1708–1715
Jaecker V, Zapf T, Naendrup JH, Pfeiffer T, Kanakamedala AC, Wafaisade A, Shafizadeh S (2017) High non-anatomic tunnel position rates in ACL reconstruction failure using both transtibial and anteromedial tunnel drilling techniques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(9):1293–1299
Bedi A, Musahl V, Steuber V, Kendoff D, Choi D, Allen AA et al (2011) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique. Arthroscopy 27(3):380–390
Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK, Tashman S, Fu FH (2010) Non anatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92:1427–1431
Panni AS, Milano G, Tartarone M, Demontis A, Fabbriciani C (2001) Clinical and radiographic results of ACL reconstruction: a 5- to 7-year follow-up study of outside-in versus inside-out reconstruction techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:77–85
Takeda Y, Iwame T, Takasago T et al (2013) Comparison of tunnel orientation between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Arthroscopy 29:195–204
Silva A, Sampaio R, Pinto E (2012) ACL reconstruction: comparison between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:896–903
Yagi M, Kuroda R, Nagamune K, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2007) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:100–107
Lane CG, Warren R, Pearle AD (2008) The pivot shift. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:679–688
Seo SS, Kim CW, Kim JG et al (2013) Clinical results comparing transtibial technique and outside in technique in single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Relat Res 25(3):133–140
Acknowledgements
We thank Peter Mittwede, MD, PhD, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Editing China, for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.
Funding
There is no funding source.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ji, G., Han, A., Hao, X. et al. Better rotational control but similar outcomes with the outside-in versus the transtibial drilling technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of comparative trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138, 1575–1581 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2976-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2976-z