Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical overreduction and hyperlordotic fusion of C1–C2 joint are associated with cervical sagittal malalignment

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Previous studies have shown that hyperlordotic C1–C2 fusion was related to postoperative subaxial kyphosis. However, most of the patients in these studies were complicated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Moreover, no studies have specifically evaluated the relationship between C1–C2 fusion angle and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope or cranial tilt (CRT) after posterior C1–C2 fusion. This study aimed to investigate the cervical sagittal alignment in non-RA patients following posterior C1–C2 fusion and the correlation between C1–C2 fusion angle and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment.

Materials and methods

From August 2004 to December 2015, twenty-eight consecutive patients with an average age of 39.2 years (range 6–70 years) who underwent posterior C1–C2 fusion from a single institution were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 30.7 months (range 12–77 months). Angles of Oc–C1, C1–C2, C2–C3 and C2–C7, cSVA, T1 slope and CRT were measured in lateral cervical radiographs in neutral position before surgery and at the final follow-up.

Results

C1–C2 angle significantly increased from 13.6° ± 12.4° to 22.0° ± 8.1° at the final follow-up (P < 0.001). A significant decrease was found both in Oc–C1 and C2–C7 angles from pre-operation to the final follow-up (P < 0.001 and P = 0.011, respectively). Moreover, cSVA and CRT dramatically increased from pre-operation to the final follow-up (P < 0.001). C1–C2 fusion angle was significantly associated with Oc–C1, C2–C7 angle, cSVA and CRT at the final follow-up. A significant correlation was also observed between postoperative change of C1–C2 angle and that of Oc–C1, C2–C7 angle, cSVA and CRT.

Conclusions

Apart from decreased subaxial lordosis, posterior C1–C2 fusion in hyperextension may also lead to kyphotic change of atlanto-occipital alignment and increased tilting forward of the cervical spine. Therefore, intraoperative overreduction of C1–C2 angle and hyperlordotic C1–C2 fusion should be avoided to maintain the physiologic cervical sagittal alignment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goel A, Laheri V (1994) Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 129:47–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Harms J, Melcher RP et al (2001) Posterior C1–C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2467–2471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yeom JS, Kafle D, Nguyen NQ et al (2012) Routine insertion of the lateral mass screw via the posterior arch for C1 fixation: feasibility and related complications. Spine J 12:476–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zheng YH, Hao DJ, Wang B et al (2016) Clinical outcome of posterior C1–C2 pedicle screw fixation and fusion for atlantoaxial instability: a retrospective study of 86 patients. J Clin Neurosci 32:47–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fielding JW, Hawkins RJ, Ratzan SA (1976) Spine fusion for atlanto-axial instability. J Bone Jt Surg Am 58:400–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haid RW Jr, Subach BR, McLaughlin MR et al (2001) C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability: a 6-year experience. Neurosurgery 49:65–68 (discussion 69–70)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoshimoto H, Ito M, Abumi K et al (2004) A retrospective radiographic analysis of subaxial sagittal alignment after posterior C1–C2 fusion. Spine 29(2):175–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mukai Y, Hosono N, Sakaura H et al (2007) Sagittal alignment of the subaxial cervical spine after C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(6):436–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, Chiba K (1994) Realignment of postoperative cervical kyphosis in children by vertebral remodeling. Spine 19(22):2565–2570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kraus DR, Peppelman WC, Agarwal AK (1991) Incidence of subaxial subluxation in patients with generalized rheumatoid arthritis who have had previous occipital cervical fusions. Spine 16(10 Suppl):S486–S489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nojiri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K (2003) Relationship between alignment of upper and lower cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals. J Neurosurg 99(1 Suppl):80–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo Q, Ni B, Yang J et al (2011) Relation between alignments of upper and subaxial cervical spine: a radiological study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(6):857–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oshima S, Sudo H, Ito M et al (2015) Subaxial sagittal alignment after atlantoaxial fixation techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(1):E49–E55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshida G, Kamiya M, Yoshihara H et al (2010) Subaxial sagittal alignment and adjacent-segment degeneration after atlantoaxial fixation performed using C-1 lateral mass and C-2 pedicle screws or transarticular screws. J Neurosurg Spine 13(4):443–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kato Y, Itoh T, Kanaya K et al (2006) Relation between atlantoaxial (C1/2) and cervical alignment (C2–C7) angles with Magerl and Brooks techniques for atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Orthop Sci 11(4):347–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith JS, Lafage V, Ryan DJ et al (2013) Association of myelopathy scores with cervical sagittal balance and normalized spinal cord volume: analysis of 56 preoperative cases from the AOSpine North America Myelopathy study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(22 Suppl 1):S161–S170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK et al (2013) Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(22 Suppl 1):S149–S160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roguski M, Benzel EC, Curran JN et al (2014) Postoperative cervical sagittal imbalance negatively affects outcomes after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(25):2070–2077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin S, Zhou F, Sun Y et al (2015) The severity of operative invasion to the posterior muscular-ligament complex influences cervical sagittal balance after open-door laminoplasty. Eur Spine J 24(1):127–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Qian J, Qiu Y, Qian BP et al (2016) Compensatory modulation for severe global sagittal imbalance: significance of cervical compensation on quality of life in thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 25(11):3715–3722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weng C, Wang J, Tuchman A et al (2016) Influence of T1 Slope on the cervical sagittal balance in degenerative cervical spine: an analysis using kinematic MRI. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(3):185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee SH, Kim KT, Seo EM et al (2012) The influence of thoracic inlet alignment on the craniocervical sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(2):E41–E47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Janusz P, Tyrakowski M, Kotwicki T et al (2015) Cervical sagittal alignment in scheuermann disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(23):E1226–E1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tennant S, Thomas M, Murphy JP et al (2002) The Marchetti–Vincenzi humeral nail-a useful device in fresh fractures. Injury 33(6):507–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dodwad SN, Dodwad SJ, Wisneski R et al (2015) Retrospective analysis of thoracolumbar junction injuries using the thoracolumbar injury severity and classification score, American spinal injury association class, injury severity score, age, sex, and length of hospitalization. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(7):E410–E416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Resnick DK, Benzel EC (2002) C1–C2 pedicle screw fixation with rigid cantilever beam construct: case report and technical note. Neurosurgery 50:426–428

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lundström A, Lundström F (1995) The Frankfort horizontal as a basis for cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107:537–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McGreger M (1948) The significance of certain measurements of the skull in the diagnosis of basilar impression. Br J Radiol 21:171–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kwon WK, Kim PS, Ahn SY et al (2017) Analysis of associating factors with C2-7 sagittal vertical axis after two-level anterior cervical fusion: comparison between plate augmentation and stand-alone cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(5):318–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gluf WM, Schmidt MH, Apfelbaum RI (2005) Atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation: a review of surgical indications, fusion rate, complications, and lessons learned in 191 adult patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2(2):155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R et al (2000) Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(16):2072–2078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang JA, Scheer JK, Smith JS et al (2012) The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 71(3):662–669 (discussion 669)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim TH, Lee SY, Kim YC et al (2013) T1 slope as a predictor of kyphotic alignment change after laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(16):E992–E997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Passias PG, Wang S, Zhao D et al (2013) The reversibility of swan neck deformity in chronic atlantoaxial dislocations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(7):E379–E385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Guo Q, Deng Y, Wang J et al (2016) Influence of the T1-slope on sagittal alignment of the subaxial cervical spine after posterior atlantoaxial fusion in os odontoideum. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 149:39–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fujiwara K, Fujimoto M, Owaki H et al (1998) Cervical lesions related to the systemic progression in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(19):2052–2056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Oda T, Fujiwara K, Yonenobu K et al (1995) Natural course of cervical spine lesions in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(10):1128–1135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Yonezawa T, Tsuji H, Matsui H et al (1995) Subaxial lesions in rheumatoid arthritis. Radiographic factors suggestive of lower cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(2):208–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Nakamura M et al (2005) Impact of interlaminar graft materials on the fusion status in atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 2:23–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hardacker JW, Shuford RF, Capicotto PN et al (1997) Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22(13):1472–1480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

One of the authors (Bang-ping Qian) has received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81372009) and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Talent Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bang-ping Qian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ji-chen Huang, Bang-ping Qian, Yong Qiu, Yang Yu, and Hong-bin Ni declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Jc., Qian, Bp., Qiu, Y. et al. Surgical overreduction and hyperlordotic fusion of C1–C2 joint are associated with cervical sagittal malalignment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137, 1631–1639 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2814-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2814-8

Keywords

Navigation