Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) using a meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials.
Materials and methods
Electronic searches of the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 11 of 12, Nov 2012), PUBMED (1980 to Dec 2012), and EMBASE (1980 to Dec 2012) were used to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated endoscopic vs open methods for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Studies to be used were independently identified by two researchers. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias.
Results
Fifteen randomized controlled trials involving 1,596 hands were included. Based on the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias, four studies were rated as high quality, five studies were rated as moderate quality, and six were rated as low quality. Our meta-analysis indicated that ECTR resulted in better recovery of pinch strength, earlier time of return to work, but a higher rate of reversible nerve problems (including neurapraxia and numbness) than OCTR. ECTR also resulted in a lower rate of irreversible nerve damage (P > 0.05), wound problems (including wound infection, wound hematoma and wound dehiscence) and reflex sympathetic dystrophy (P > 0.05) compared with OCTR. Our meta-analysis revealed no obvious statistical differences in relief of symptoms (pain and paraesthesia), recovery of grip strength and reoperation rate.
Conclusion
Our meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials demonstrated that ECTR and OCTR were similar in relief of symptoms, but ECTR resulted in better recovery of function and earlier return to work and was safer than OCTR.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stecco C, Aldegheri R (2008) Historical review of carpal tunnel syndrome. Chir Org Mov 92(1):7–10
Atroshi I et al (2011) Incidence of physician-diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome in the general population. Arch Intern Med 171(10):943–944
Latinovic R, Gulliford MC, Hughes RA (2006) Incidence of common compressive neuropathies in primary care. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77(2):263–265
Duncan KH et al (1987) Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by members of the American Society for surgery of the hand: results of a questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 12(3):384–391
Faraj AA, Ahmed MH, Saeed OA (2012) A comparative study of the surgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome by mini-transverse wrist incisions versus traditional longitudinal technique. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 22(3):221–225
Kessler FB (1986) Complications of the management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Hand Clin 2(2):401–406
Scholten RJ et al (2007) Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17(4)
Agee JM et al (1992) Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: a randomized prospective multicenter study. J Hand Surg Am 17(6):987–995
Chow JC (1989) Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament: a new technique for carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthroscopy 5(1):19–24
Okutsu I et al (1989) Endoscopic management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthroscopy 5(1):11–18
Thoma A et al (2004) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(5):1137–1146
Helm RH, Vaziri S (2003) Evaluation of carpal tunnel release using the Knifelight instrument. J Hand Surg Br 28(3):251–254
Lee WP, Strickland JW (1998) Safe carpal tunnel release via a limited palmar incision. Plast Reconstr Surg 101(2):418–424
Bromley GS (1994) Minimal-incision open carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Am 19(1):119–120
Brown RA et al (1993) Carpal tunnel release. A prospective, randomized assessment of open and endoscopic methods. J Bone Jt Surg Am 75(9):1265–1275
Erdmann MW (1994) Endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Br 19(1):5–13
Dumontier C, et al (1995) Early results of conventional versus two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release—a prospective study. J Hand Surg 20B(5):658–662
Sennwald GR, Benedetti R (1995) The value of one-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3(2):113–116
Benedetti VR, Sennwald G (1996) Agee endoscopic decompression of the median nerve: prospective study with comparison to open decompression. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 28(3):151–155
Jacobsen MB, Rahme H (1996) A prospective, randomized study with an independent observer comparing open carpal tunnel release with endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Br 21(2):202–204
Stark B, Engkvist-Lofmark C (1996) Carpal tunnel syndrome. Endoscopic release or conventional surgery. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 28(3):128–132
Ferdinand RD, MacLean JGB (2002) Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. A prospective, randomised, blinded assessment. J Bone Jt Surg Ser B 84(3):375–379
Trumble TE et al (2002) Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared with open release: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A 84(7):1107–1115
Eichhorn J, Dieterich K (2003) Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Results of a prospective study. Chirurgische Praxis 61(2):279–283
MacDermid JC et al (2003) Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a randomized trial. J Hand Surg 28(3):475–480
Saw NLB, et al (2003) Early outcome and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a randomized prospective trial. J Hand Surg 28B(5):444–449
Malhotra R et al (2007) Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a short-term comparative study. Indian J Orthop 41(1):57–61
Tian Y, Zhao H, Wang T (2007) Prospective comparison of endoscopic and open surgical methods for carpal tunnel syndrome. Chin Med Sci J 22(2):104–107
Atroshi I et al (2009) Open compared with 2-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Am 34(2):266–272
Aslani HR et al (2012) Comparison of carpal tunnel release with three different techniques. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 114(7):965–968
Atroshi I et al (2006) Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among employed patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 332(7556):1473
Higgins JP, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Spitzer WO (1995) Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam consultation on meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 48(1):167–171
Boeckstyns ME, Sorensen AI (1999) Does endoscopic carpal tunnel release have a higher rate of complications than open carpal tunnel release? An analysis of published series. J Hand Surg Br 24(1):9–15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, L., Duan, X., Huang, X. et al. Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel decompression. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 585–593 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1898-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1898-z