Skip to main content
Log in

Intra- and inter-observer variation during femoral jig rotational alignment in knee arthroplasty

  • Knee Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction/aims

Rotational alignment of the femoral prosthesis is important in total knee arthroplasty to improve performance and reduce complications. This study investigates the differences between two popular referencing methods and evaluates the variability of surgeons’ techniques (inter-observer) and their reproducibility (intra-observer) of femoral alignment.

Methods

Eight surgeons each established the femoral rotational alignment on four duplicate sets of six cadaveric femoral bone casts, referencing from the epicondylar axis and from the posterior femoral condyles. These derived axes were compared against a reference Whiteside’s line (anteroposterior axis).

Results/summary

There was no significant difference between referencing techniques and a tendency to align the femoral component in slight external rotation. Femoral rotational alignment was reproducible by each surgeon. Extensive and significant variation in alignment exists between surgeons, independent of other factors (p < 0.001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T et al (1999) Effects of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 366:155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ et al (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 356:144–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:40–47

    Google Scholar 

  4. Briard JL, Hungerford DS (1989) Patellofemoral instability in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 4(Suppl):S87–S97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grace JN, Rand JA (1998) Patellar instability after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 237:184–189

    Google Scholar 

  6. Insall JN, Scott WN, Ranawat CS (1979) The total condylar prosthesis: a report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] A 61:173–180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2004) Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 75:74–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE (2001) Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392:38–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mochizuki RM, Schurman DJ (1979) Patella complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] A 61:879–883

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moreland JR, Basset LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] A 69:745

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR et al (1996) Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 331:35–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Mahoney OM, Tullos HS (1990) The effect of femoral component position on patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 260:43–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Singerman R, Pagan HD, Peyser AB, Goldberg VM (1997) Effect of femoral component rotation and patella design on patellar forces. Clin Orthop 334:345–353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Giori NJ (2005) The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] A 87:2276–2280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V (2002) Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84(Suppl 2):90–98

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tew M, Waugh W (1985) Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] B 67:551–556

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wasiliewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty R, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG (1994) Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 299:31–43

    Google Scholar 

  18. Whiteside LA, Arima J (1995) The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:168–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yosioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TD (1987) The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:873–880

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip J. Wraighte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wraighte, P.J., Sikand, M. & Livesley, P.J. Intra- and inter-observer variation during femoral jig rotational alignment in knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131, 1283–1286 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1273-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1273-x

Keywords

Navigation