Skip to main content
Log in

Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Cobb angle in the measurement of vertebral, local and segmental kyphosis of traumatic lumbar spine fractures in the lateral X-ray

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Measurement of the vertebral, local and segmental kyphosis according to Cobb is a standard procedure in the assessment of traumatic, idiopathic and degenerative spinal deformities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of these three radiological angles on the basis of lateral X-rays in lumbar spine fractures with spinal kyphosis.

Patients and methods

A consecutive series of 88 patients with traumatic lumbar spine fractures with kyphotic deformities were included in the study. All patients were younger that 50 years of age and had an adequate trauma leading to the fracture. Three independent observers with different levels of clinical training measured the vertebral, segmental and local kyphosis of these patients on the basis of lateral X-rays. The readings were repeated 4 weeks later to assess intra-observer reliability.

Results

The most common injury mechanism was a fall from a height of more than 3 m. The first lumbar vertebra was the most commonly affected. Mean inter- and intra-observer reliabilities were good for the vertebral (mean ICC: 0.6607; mean ICC: 0.6979) and local (mean ICC: 0.7778; mean ICC: 0.7642) kyphosis and excellent (mean ICC: 0.8129; mean ICC: 0.8103) for the segmental kyphosis.

Conclusion

In this study, the segmental-, vertebral-, and local kyphosis angle according to Cobb showed sufficient inter- and intra-observer reliability for the use in daily practice and scientific studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cybulski GR, Douglas RA, Meyer PR Jr, Rovin RA (1992) Complications in three-column cervical spine injuries requiring anterior–posterior stabilization. Spine 17(3):253–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Farcy JP, Weidenbaum M, Glassman SD (1990) Sagittal index in management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 15(9):958–965

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Denis F, Armstrong GW, Searls K, Matta L (1984) Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficit. A comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 189:142–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gertzbein SD (1994) Neurologic deterioration in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures after admission to the hospital. Spine 19(15):1723–1725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hertlein H, Hartl WH, Dienemann H, Schurmann M, Lob G (1995) Thoracoscopic repair of thoracic spine trauma. Eur Spine J 4(5):302–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stotts AK, Smith JT, Santora SD, Roach JW, D’Astous JL (2002) Measurement of spinal kyphosis: implications for the management of Scheuermann’s kyphosis. Spine 27(19):2143–2146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cobb J (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect 5:261–275

    Google Scholar 

  8. Böhler J (1971) Conservative treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Z Unfallmed Berufskr 2:100–104

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goutallier D, Louis R (1977) Therapeutic indications in unstable fractures of the spine. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 63(5):475–481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trojan E (1972) Long-term results of 200 vertebral fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine without paralysis. Z Unfallmed Berufskr 65(2):122–134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McLain RF, Sparling E, Benson DR (1993) Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoraco-lumbar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:162–169

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gebhard F, Schultheiss M (2009) Surgical treatment of fractures of the lumbar spine, vol 1. Steinkopff, Darmstatt, pp 129–136

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter R, Bach CM (2007) Inter- and intra-observer reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J 16(10):1587–1592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sutherland CJ, Miller F, Wang GJ (1983) Early progressive kyphosis following compression fractures. Two case reports from a series of “stable” thoracolumbar compression fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173:216–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tayyab NA, Samartzis D, Altiok H, Shuff CE, Lubicky JP, Herman J, Khanna N (2007) The reliability and diagnostic value of radiographic criteria in sagittal spine deformities: comparison of the vertebral wedge ratio to the segmental Cobb angle. Spine 32(16):E451–E459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tribus CB (1998) Scheuermann’s kyphosis in adolescents and adults: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 6(1):36–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ulmar B, Richter M, Kelsch G, Cakir B, Puhl W, Huch K (2005) Distractible vertebral body replacement for the thoracic and lumbar spine. Acta Orthop Belg 71(4):467–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Voutsinas SA, MacEwen GD (1986) Sagittal profiles of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 210:235–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Briggs AM, Wrigley TV, Tully EA, Adams PE, Greig AM, Bennell KL (2007) Radiographic measures of thoracic kyphosis in osteoporosis: Cobb and vertebral centroid angles. Skeletal Radiol 36(8):761–767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(3):328–333

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hicks GE, George SZ, Nevitt MA, Cauley JA, Vogt MT (2006) Measurement of lumbar lordosis: inter-rater reliability, minimum detectable change and longitudinal variation. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(7):501–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee SW, Hong JT, Son BC, Sung JH, Kim IS, Park CK (2007) Analysis of accuracy of kyphotic angle measurement for vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures. J Clin Neurosci 14(10):961–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3(4):184–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pfleischifter J (2006) Evidenzbasierte Konsensus Leitlinie zur Osteoporose. Prophylaxe, Diagnostik und Therapie bei Frauen ab der Menopause, bei Männern ab dem 60. Lebensjahr. Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 1–343

    Google Scholar 

  25. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Fredrickson BE, Lubicky JP (1983) The value of computed tomography in thoracolumbar fractures. An analysis of one hundred consecutive cases and a new classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(4):461–473

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Holland B (2001) Reliability of centroid, Cobb, and Harrison posterior tangent methods: which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis. Spine 26(11):E227–E234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(3):320–327

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Polly DW Jr, Kilkelly FX, McHale KA, Asplund LM, Mulligan M, Chang AS (1996) Measurement of lumbar lordosis. Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine 21(13):1530–1535 discussion 5–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kuklo TR, Polly DW, Owens BD, Zeidman SM, Chang AS, Klemme WR (2001) Measurement of thoracic and lumbar fracture kyphosis: evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine 26(1):61–65 discussion 6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Seel EH, Verrill CL, Mehta RL, Davies EM (2005) Measurement of fracture kyphosis with the Oxford Cobbometer: intra- and interobserver reliabilities and comparison with other techniques. Spine 30(8):964–968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Badke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulmar, B., Gühring, M., Schmälzle, T. et al. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Cobb angle in the measurement of vertebral, local and segmental kyphosis of traumatic lumbar spine fractures in the lateral X-ray. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130, 1533–1538 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1104-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1104-5

Keywords

Navigation