Skip to main content
Log in

Challenges and opportunities in the design of age-appropriate drug products

Herausforderungen und Chancen in der Gestaltung altersgerechter Arzneimittel

  • Beiträge zum Themenschwerpunkt
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The age appropriateness of a pharmaceutical product for older patient populations is most important in achieving ease of use, administration, and adherence as well as the therapeutic benefit of the drug. Drug development is a lengthy and risky investment accompanied by extensive regulatory requirements to meet all the safety, efficacy, and quality criteria of a pharmaceutical product. Older adults represent a very heterogeneous patient population with different needs compared to younger adults. Major areas that should be considered in the design of age-appropriate products (AAP) are age- and disease-related aspects such as (a) different dose strengths, (b) issues in handling, administering, and managing the drug product, (c) and complex medication regimens. The application of different technologies can meet these specific needs and should be considered at the very beginning of product development when setting the targeted quality product profile (TQPP) or later on during the product life-cycle management.

Zusammenfassung

Der einfache Gebrauch und Anwendung von Arzneimitteln ist eine Grundvoraussetzung für Adhärenz und das Erreichen der therapeutischen Ziele. Die altersgerechte Gestaltung von Arzneimitteln spielt dabei für ältere Menschen eine entscheidende Rolle. Die Entwicklung von Arzneimitteln ist eine langfristige und risikoreiche Investition, die begleitet wird von regulatorischen Vorgaben, um die Sicherheit, Wirksamkeit und Qualität des Arzneimittels zu belegen. Ältere Patienten stellen ein sehr heterogenes Patientenkollektiv dar, deren Bedürfnisse sich von denen jüngerer Menschen unterscheiden. Altersgerechte Arzneimittel berücksichtigen die alters- und krankheitsbedingten Veränderungen wie Dosierungen, Probleme der Applikation und Umgang mit Arzneimitteln auch in komplexen therapeutischen Schemata. Durch die Anwendung verschiedener pharmazeutischer Technologien kann diesen Aspekten entsprechend Rechnung getragen werden. Altersgerechte Arzneimittel sollten deshalb bereits am Anfang der Entwicklung im Targeted Quality Product Profile (TQPP) berücksichtigt oder im Zuge des Life Cycle Managements eingeführt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jaruzelski B, Loehr J, Holman R (2011) The global innovation 1000: why culture is key. Booz & Co Report 65

  2. DiMasi JA, Hansen RW, Grabowski HG (2003) The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. J Health Econ 22:151–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. (o A) (2010) Pharmaceutical key trends 2010. Report DMHC2599, Datamonitor

  4. Kola I, Landis J (2004) Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:711–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mullard A (2011) 2010 FDA drug approvals. Nat Rev Drug Discov 10:82–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kneller R (2010) The importance of new companies for drug discovery: origins of a decade of new drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:867–882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Snow V, Barry P, Fihn SD et al (2004) Primary care management of chronic stable angina and asymptomatic suspected or known coronary artery disease: a clinical practice guideline from the American college of physicians. Ann Intern Med 141:562–567

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maas J, Kamm W, Hauck G (2007) An integrated early formulation strategy – from hit evaluation to preclinical candidate profiling. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 66:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffman AS (2008) The origin and evolution of “controlled” drug delivery systems. J Contr Rel 132:153–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Swain S, Beg S, Singh A et al (2011) Advanced techniques for penetration enhancement in transdermal drug delivery systems. Curr Drug Deliv 8(4):456–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hohenegger M (2010) Novel and current treatment concepts using pulmonary drug delivery. Curr Pharm Design 16:2484–2492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stegemann S, Ecker F, Maio M et al (2010) Geriatric drug therapy: neglecting the inevitable majority. Ageing Res Rev 9(4):384–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klotz U (2009) Pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism in the elderly. Drug Metab Rev 41(2):67–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bushardt RL, Massey EB, Simpson TW et al (2008) Polypharmacy: misleading, but manageable. Clin Interv Aging 3(2):383–389

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Delafuente JC (2003) Understanding and preventing drug interactions in elderly patients. Crit Rev Oncolo Hematol 48:133–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodenhuis N, De Smet PAGM, Barends DM (2004) The rational of scored tablets as dosage form. Eur J Pharm Sci 21:305–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. (o A) (2009) FDA Tablet splitting: a risky practice. 21. July 2009 http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm171492.htm

  18. Quinzler R, Gasse C, Schneider A et al (2006) The frequency of inappropriate tablet splitting in primary care. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 62:1065–1073

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Atkin PA, Finnegan TP, Ogle SJ, Shenfield GM (1994) Functional ability of patients to manage medication packaging: a survey of geriatric inpatients. Age Ageing 23:113–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JK, Grace KA, Taylor AJ (2006) Effect of a pharmacy care program on medication adherence and persistence, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. JAMA 296(21):2563–2571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Klaver CW, Wolfs RCW, Vingerling JR et al (1998) Age-specific prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population. Arch Ophathalmol 116:653–658

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wijk H, Berg S, Bergman B et al (2002) Colour perception among the very elderly related to visual and cognitive function. Scand J Caring Sci 16:91–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hersberger J (1997) Differenzierbarkeit und Präferenz von Kapselfarben bei älteren Menschen. Lizentiatsarbeit Universität Basel, Institut für Psychologie, November 1997

  24. Perrig JW, Wippich W, Perrig-Chiello P (1993) Unbewußte Informationsbearbeitung. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern

  25. Perrig-Chiello P, Perrig JW, Staehelin H et al (1994) IDA-Die Basler Interdisziplinäre Altersstudie

  26. Stegemann S (2005) Colored capsules – a contribution to drug safety. Pharm Ind 67(9):1088–1095

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stegemann S, Gosch M, Breitkreutz J (o J) Swallowing dysfunction and dysphagia is an unrecognized challenge for oral drug therapy. Int J Pharm (in press)

  28. Kottke MK, Stetsko G, Rosenbaum SE, Rhodes CT (1990) Problems encountered by the elderly in the use of conventional dosage forms. J Geriatr Drug Ther 5(2):77–92

    Google Scholar 

  29. Payot V, Cordonier A-C, Marquis J et al (2011) Prevalence of patients’ difficulties in swallowing solid SODF. Int J Clin Pharm 33:402

    Google Scholar 

  30. Paradiso LM, Roughead EE, Gilbert AL et al (2002) Crushing or atering medications: what’s happening in residential aged-care facilities? Aust J Ageing 21(3):123–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Strachan I, Greener M (2005) Medication related swallowing difficulties may be more common than we realize. Pharm Pract 15(10) 411–414

    Google Scholar 

  32. Clave P, Arreola V, Romea M et al (2008) Accuracy of the volume viscosity swallow test for clinical screening of oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration. Clin Nutri 27:806–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Spomer N, Klingmann V, Stoltenberg I et al (2012) Acceptance of uncoated mini-tablets in young children: results from a prospective exploratory cross-over study. Arch Dis Child 97:283–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Metz DC, Vakily M, Dixit T, Mulford D (2009) Review article: dual delayed release formulation of dexlansoprazole MR, a novel approach to overcome the limitations of conventional single release proton pumb inhibitor therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 29:928–937

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Carneby-Mann G, Crary M (2005) Pill swallowing by adults with dysphagia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(11):970–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Breitkreutz J, Boos J (2007) Paediatric and geriatric drug delivery. Exp Opin Drug Deliv 4(1):37–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Geriatric Medicine Society (2011) Expert meeting on geriatric medicines. March 16, 2011 http://www.geriatric-medicine.org/images/downloads/gme_meeting20110311.pdf

  38. Guidance for Industry: container closure systems for packaging human drugs and biologics. FDA May 1999 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm070551.pdf

  39. Woodcock J, Griffin JP, Behrman RE (2011) Development of novel combination therapies. N Engl J Med 364(11):985–987

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Stegemann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stegemann, S. Challenges and opportunities in the design of age-appropriate drug products. Z Gerontol Geriat 45, 479–484 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-012-0361-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-012-0361-z

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation