Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) performed by experienced endoscopists with limited experience in gastric ESD

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Since colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) requires higher-level skills than endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), it is recommended to acquire sufficient experience in gastric ESD prior to attempting colorectal ESD. We evaluated the ability of experienced endoscopists with limited experience in gastric ESD to perform colorectal ESD.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 120 colorectal ESDs performed by two endoscopists who had expertise in colonoscopy and colorectal EMR but experience of fewer than five gastric ESDs. Main outcomes were the en bloc resection rate with tumor-free margins (R0 resection rate) and adverse events rate. Using only clinical characteristics prior to ESD, we also identified factors affecting outcomes.

Results

A total of 113 patients (94.2 %) received en bloc resection, and the R0 resection rate was 80.0 % (96/120). Perforation and postoperative hemorrhage occurred in eight (6.7 %) and two (1.7 %) patients, respectively. Dividing the 120 cases into three learning phases, R0 resection and perforation rates improved from 77.5 % (31/40) and 12.5 % (5/40) in phase 1 to 85.0 % (34/40) and 2.5 % (1/40) in phase 3, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that lesions at junctions (dentate line, sigmoid-descending junction, splenic flexure, hepatic flexure, ileocecal valve) and lesions with factors reflecting fibrosis in the submucosal layer (based on endoscopic findings before ESD) were significantly correlated with R0 resection failure, with adjusted odds ratios of 10.5 (95 % CI 2.1–67.6) and 10.4 (2.7–48.6), respectively.

Conclusions

Colorectal ESD is feasible for experienced endoscopists with limited experience in gastric ESD. Novices should avoid lesions at junctions or those with factors reflecting fibrosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Repici A, Hassan C, De Paula PD, Pagano N, Arezzo A, Zullo A, Lorenzetti R, Marmo R (2012) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review. Endoscopy 44(2):137–150. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1291448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Taku K, Sano Y, Fu KI, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Uraoka T, Yoshino T, Yamaguchi Y, Fujita M, Hattori S, Ishikawa T, Saito D, Fujii T, Kaneko E, Yoshida S (2007) Iatrogenic perforation associated with therapeutic colonoscopy: a multicenter study in Japan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22(9):1409–1414. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05022.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oka S, Tanaka S, Kanao H, Ishikawa H, Watanabe T, Igarashi M, Saito Y, Ikematsu H, Kobayashi K, Inoue Y, Yahagi N, Tsuda S, Simizu S, Iishi H, Yamano H, Kudo SE, Tsuruta O, Tamura S, Saito Y, Cho E, Fujii T, Sano Y, Nakamura H, Sugihara K, Muto T (2010) Current status in the occurrence of postoperative bleeding, perforation and residual/local recurrence during colonoscopic treatment in Japan. Dig Endosc: Official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society 22(4):376–380. doi:10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.01016.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K (2008) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 43(9):641–651. doi:10.1007/s00535-008-2223-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshida N, Wakabayashi N, Kanemasa K, Sumida Y, Hasegawa D, Inoue K, Morimoto Y, Kashiwa A, Konishi H, Yagi N, Naito Y, Yanagisawa A, Yoshikawa T (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors: technical difficulties and rate of perforation. Endoscopy 41(9):758–761. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1215028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hotta K, Oyama T, Shinohara T, Miyata Y, Takahashi A, Kitamura Y, Tomori A (2010) Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors. Dig Endoscopy: official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society 22(4):302–306. doi:10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.01005.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Goto O, Kodashima S, Koike K (2012) Safety and efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection by the trainee endoscopists. Dig Endosc: official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society 24(Suppl 1):154–158. doi:10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01251.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, Kodashima S, Muraki Y, Ono S, Yamamichi N, Tateishi A, Oka M, Ogura K, Kawabe T, Ichinose M, Omata M (2007) Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 5(6):678–683. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2007.01.006, quiz 645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N, Hinohara C, Oshima T, Kogure E, Liu Y, Uemura N, Saito K (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors. Endoscopy 39(5):418–422. doi:10.1055/s-2007-966427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I, Hirata M, Mouri R, Kanao H, Yoshida S, Chayama K (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 66(1):100–107. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T, Emura F, Ikehara H, Mashimo Y, Kikuchi T, Fu KI, Sano Y, Saito D (2007) Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointestinal endoscopy 66(5):966–973. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Isomoto H, Nishiyama H, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ishii H, Ikeda K, Ohnita K, Nakao K, Kohno S, Shikuwa S (2009) Clinicopathological factors associated with clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms. Endoscopy 41(8):679–683. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1214979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, Hotta K, Sakamoto N, Ikematsu H, Fukuzawa M, Kobayashi N, Nasu J, Michida T, Yoshida S, Ikehara H, Otake Y, Nakajima T, Matsuda T, Saito D (2010) A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72(6):1217–1225. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Deprez PH, Bergman JJ, Meisner S, Ponchon T, Repici A, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Haringsma J (2010) Current practice with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe: position statement from a panel of experts. Endoscopy 42(10):853–858. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1255563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Iacopini F, Bella A, Costamagna G, Gotoda T, Saito Y, Elisei W, Grossi C, Rigato P, Scozzarro A (2012) Stepwise training in rectal and colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection with differentiated learning curves. Gastrointest Endosc 76(6):1188–1196. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Suzuki H, Gotoda T, Sasako M, Saito D (2006) Detection of early gastric cancer: misunderstanding the role of mass screening. Gastric Cancer: official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 9(4):315–319. doi:10.1007/s10120-006-0399-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shiga H, Endo K, Kuroha M, Kakuta Y, Takahashi S, Kinouchi Y, Shimosegawa T (2014) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia during the clinical learning curve. Surg Endosc 28(7):2120–2128. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3443-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hori K, Uraoka T, Harada K, Higashi R, Kawahara Y, Okada H, Ramberan H, Yahagi N, Yamamoto K (2014) Predictive factors for technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colorectum. Endoscopy 46(10):862–870. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1377205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hayashi N, Tanaka S, Nishiyama S, Terasaki M, Nakadoi K, Oka S, Yoshihara M, Chayama K (2014) Predictors of incomplete resection and perforation associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 79(3):427–435. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2013.09.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mizushima T, Kato M, Iwanaga I, Sato F, Kubo K, Ehira N, Uebayashi M, Ono S, Nakagawa M, Mabe K, Shimizu Y, Sakamoto N (2014) Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors. Surgical endoscopy. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3665-9

  21. Sato K, Ito S, Kitagawa T, Kato M, Tominaga K, Suzuki T, Maetani I (2014) Factors affecting the technical difficulty and clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Surgical endoscopy. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3558-y

  22. Workshop. PitP (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon. Gastrointest Endosc 58(6 Suppl):S3–43

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tanaka S, Tamegai Y, Tsuda S, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano HO (2010) Multicenter questionnaire survey on the current situation of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan. Dig Endosc: official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society 22(Suppl 1):S2–8. doi:10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.00952.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Probst A, Golger D, Anthuber M, Markl B, Messmann H (2012) Endoscopic submucosal dissection in large sessile lesions of the rectosigmoid: learning curve in a European center. Endoscopy 44(7):660–667. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1309403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Terasaki M, Tanaka S, Shigita K, Asayama N, Nishiyama S, Hayashi N, Nakadoi K, Oka S, Chayama K (2014) Risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(7):877–882. doi:10.1007/s00384-014-1901-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interests

Hisashi Shiga, Masatake Kuroha, Katsuya Endo, Tomoya Kimura, Yoichi Kakuta, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Shoichi Kayaba, and Tooru Shimosegawa have no conflicts of interest or financial relationships to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hisashi Shiga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shiga, H., Kuroha, M., Endo, K. et al. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) performed by experienced endoscopists with limited experience in gastric ESD. Int J Colorectal Dis 30, 1645–1652 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2334-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2334-3

Keywords

Navigation