Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ileocecal resection for Crohn’s disease before the era of biologics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Crohn’s disease (CD) of the terminal ileum not responding to standard medical treatment is more and more treated with biologics instead of surgery. In order to get more information on the results of surgery, we analyzed the outcome of laparoscopic ileocecal resection (LICR) performed before the widespread use of these drugs.

Methods

Chart reviews and telephone follow-ups were performed on 119 patients treated with laparoscopic ileocecal resection for CD. Follow-ups were performed at a median of 58 (17–124) and 113(69–164) months. Symptomatic restenosis requiring surgery or endoscopic dilatation was the primary endpoint. We further analyzed risk factors of recurrence.

Results

Of the 119 patients initially treated, 18 required surgery (n = 14) or endoscopic dilatation (n = 4). The calculated rates of re-intervention were 10 und 17.5 % at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Ninety percent of the patients had a Crohn-specific medication treatment at the time of surgery, but only 51.4 und 46.9 % at FU 1 und 2, respectively. Smoking increased the risk of recurrence (OR 3.7, P = 0.011).

Conclusion

The data demonstrate excellent long-term results of LICR for CD of the terminal ileum. Surgery should be considered as a first choice treatment in many patients with ileocecal CD not responding to conventional treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Binder V, Both H, Hansen PK, Hendriksen C, Kreiner S, Torp-Pedersen K (1982) Incidence and prevalence of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease in the County of Copenhagen, 1962 to 1978. Gastroenterology 83:563–568

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Loftus EV Jr, Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ (2010) The natural history of adult Crohn’s disease in population-based cohorts. Am J Gastroenterol 105:289–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Freeman HJ (2007) Application of the Montreal classification for Crohn’s disease to a single clinician database of 1,015 patients. Can J Gastroenterol = J Can Gastroenterol 21:363–366

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lichtenstein GR, Abreu MT, Cohen R, Tremaine W (2006) American Gastroenterological Association Institute medical position statement on corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 130:935–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Travis SP, Stange EF, Lemann M, Oresland T, Chowers Y et al (2006) European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: current management. Gut 55(Suppl 1):i16–i35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffmann JC, Preiss JC, Autschbach F, Buhr HJ, Hauser W et al (2008) Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of Crohn’s disease. Z Gastroenterol 46:1094–1146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rutgeerts P, Goboes K, Peeters M, Hiele M, Penninckx F et al (1991) Effect of fecal stream diversion on recurrence of Crohn’s disease in the neoterminal ileum. Lancet 338:771–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamamoto T (2005) Factors affecting recurrence after surgery for Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol: WJG 11:3971–3979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cullen G, O’Toole A, Keegan D, Sheahan K, Hyland JM, O’Donoghue DP (2007) Long-term clinical results of ileocecal resection for Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 13:1369–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Pierik EG et al (2006) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 243:143–149, discussion 50–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eshuis EJ, Slors JF, Stokkers PC, Sprangers MA, Ubbink DT et al (2010) Long-term outcomes following laparoscopically assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 97:563–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Milsom JW, Hammerhofer KA, Bohm B, Marcello P, Elson P, Fazio VW (2001) Prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1–8, discussion −9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stocchi L, Milsom JW, Fazio VW (2008) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 144:622–627, discussion 7–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Polle SW, Wind J, Ubbink DT, Hommes DW, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2006) Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. A systematic review. Dig Surg 23:346–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lesperance K, Martin MJ, Lehmann R, Brounts L, Steele SR (2009) National trends and outcomes for the surgical therapy of ileocolonic Crohn’s disease: a population-based analysis of laparoscopic versus open approaches. J Gastrointest Surg : Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 13:1251–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Salmon-Ceron D, Tubach F, Lortholary O, Chosidow O, Bretagne S et al (2011) Drug-specific risk of non-tuberculosis opportunistic infections in patients receiving anti-TNF therapy reported to the 3-year prospective French RATIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis 70:616–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shale M, Kanfer E, Panaccione R, Ghosh S (2008) Hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 57:1639–1641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eshuis EJ, Stokkers PC, Bemelman WA (2010) Decision-making in ileocecal Crohn’s disease management: surgery versus pharmacotherapy. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:181–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cunningham MF, Docherty NG, Coffey JC, Burke JP, O’Connell PR (2010) Postsurgical recurrence of ileal Crohn’s disease: an update on risk factors and intervention points to a central role for impaired host-microflora homeostasis. World J Surg 34:1615–1626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weston LA, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ Jr, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Rusin LC (1996) Ileocolic resection for acute presentation of Crohn’s disease of the ileum. Dis Colon Rectum 39:841–846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Simillis C, Yamamoto T, Reese GE, Umegae S, Matsumoto K et al (2008) A meta-analysis comparing incidence of recurrence and indication for reoperation after surgery for perforating versus nonperforating Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 103:196–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sachar DB, Lemmer E, Ibrahim C, Edden Y, Ullman T et al (2009) Recurrence patterns after first resection for stricturing or penetrating Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15:1071–1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolff BG (2001) Resection margins in Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 88:771–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vestweber B, Galetin T, Lammerting K, Paul C, Giehl J et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from 224 colonic resections performed at a single center using SILS. Surg Endosc 27:434–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas D. Rink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rink, A.D., Fischer, I.R., Vestweber, B. et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ileocecal resection for Crohn’s disease before the era of biologics. Int J Colorectal Dis 29, 127–132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1744-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1744-3

Keywords

Navigation