Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the NiTi Shape Memory BioDynamix ColonRing™ in colorectal anastomosis: first in human multi-center study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Shape-memory compression bowel anastomosis using a nickel and titanium alloy may reduce leak rates and eliminate foreign anastomotic material. Its safety and efficacy had been demonstrated by animal studies. We conducted the first prospective multi-center clinical evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of BioDynamix anastomosis with ColonRing™ for large-bowel end-to-end or side-to-end anastomosis.

Materials and methods

The ColonRing™ was compared to the standard double-stapled colorectal/colocolonic anastomosis. Intraoperative and immediate postoperative and 1- and 3-month postoperative follow-up data were recorded.

Results

Ten study patients (four males, median age 62 years, range 35–75) were compared to 13 demographically matched controls (six males, median age 62 years, range 47–82). Colorectal neoplasia was the most frequent indication for surgery (21/23 patients, 91%). The median anastomotic distance from the anal verge for both groups was 10 cm (6–20 cm). The first postoperative bowel movement was on day 5 ±2.2 (study group) and on day 4 ±1.8 (controls), and the median hospital stay was 8 days (6–14 days) and 7 days (6–13 days), respectively. There were no anastomotic leaks. There were three minor complications in each group, unrelated to the device in the study group. Two patients required transanal digital extraction of the ring which was detached but not expelled (one had a soft anastomotic stricture).

Conclusions

Our preliminary results in this first study on humans indicate that the safety and efficacy of BioDynamix anastomosis with ColonRing™ in colorectal anastomosis in human is comparable to standard staples technology and warrant larger studies for further validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hardy KJ (1990) Non-suture anastomosis: the historical development. Aust N Z J Surg 60:625–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCue JL, Phillips RK (1991) Sutureless intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 78:1291–1296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thiede A, Geiger D, Dietz UA, Debus ES, Engemann R, Lexer GC et al (1988) Overview on compression anastomoses: biofragmentable anastomosis ring multicenter prospective trial of 1666 anastomoses. World J Surg 22:78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wullstein C, Gross E (2000) Compression anastomosis (AKA-2) in colorectal surgery: results in 442 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 87:1071–1075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kapanen A, Ryhänen J, Danilov A, Tuukkanen J (2001) Effect of nickel–titanium shape memory metal alloy on bone formation. Biomaterials 22:2475–2480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aggarwal R, Darzi A (2005) Compression anastomoses revisited. J Am Coll Surg 201:965–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baynosa RC, Stutman R, Mahabir RC, Zamboni WA, Khiabani KT (2008) Use of a novel penetrating, sutureless anastomotic device in arterial microvascular anastomoses. J Reconstr Microsurg 24:39–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lustosa SAS, Matos D, Atallah AN, Castro AA (2001) Stapled versus hand sewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ravitch MM (1982) Development of intestinal anastomotic devices. S Med J 75:1520–1524

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy JB (1982) Chloecysto-intestinal, gastrointestinal, enterointestinal anastomosis and approximation without sutures. Med Rec 42:665–676

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hardy TG Jr, Pace WG, Maney JW, Katz AR, Kaganov AL (1985) A biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis. An experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 28:484–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanshin NN, Lytkin MI, Knysh VI, Klur VIu, Khamidov AI (1984) First experience with application of compression anastomoses with the apparatus AKA-2 in operations on the large intestine. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek 132:52–57

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Waxman BP, Yii MK, Pahlman L (1995) Stapling in colorectal surgery. In: Mazier WP (ed) Surgery of the colon, rectum and anus. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kopelman D, Lelcuk S, Sayfan J, Matter I, Willenz EP, Zaidenstein L et al (2007) End-to-end compression anastomosis of the rectum: a pig model. World J Surg 31:532–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart D, Hunt S, Pierce R, Mao D, Frisella M, Cook K et al (2007) Validation of the NITI endoluminal compression anastomosis ring (EndoCAR) device and comparison to the traditional circular stapled colorectal anastomosis in a porcine model. Surg Innov 14:252–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nudelman I, Fuko V, Waserberg N, Niv Y, Rubin M, Szold A et al (2005) Colonic anastomosis performed with a memory-shaped device. Am J Surg 190:434–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. D'Hoore A, Hompes D, Folkesson J, Penninckx F, Pahlman L (2008) Circular 'superelastic' compression anastomosis: from the animal lab to the clinical practice. Minim Invasive Ther 17(3):172–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Stephen Cohen for generously providing the colonoscopy pictures. Esther Eshkol is thanked for the editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hagit Tulchinsky.

Additional information

This project was funded by NiTi™ Surgical Solutions, Inc.,.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tulchinsky, H., Kashtan, H., Rabau, M. et al. Evaluation of the NiTi Shape Memory BioDynamix ColonRing™ in colorectal anastomosis: first in human multi-center study. Int J Colorectal Dis 25, 1453–1458 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-0985-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-0985-7

Keywords

Navigation