Abstract
Background and aims
Treatment of anorectal sepsis requires prompt surgical drainage, but it is important to identify any associated anal fistula for preventing recurrence. We evaluated whether microbiological analysis and/or endoanal ultrasonography could be used to predict anal fistula in patients with acute anorectal sepsis.
Methods
Five hundred fourteen consecutive patients with acute anorectal sepsis were studied. Clinical data, digital examination findings, endosonographic findings, and results of microbiological analysis were compared with definitive surgical findings of the presence or absence of anal fistula.
Results
Anorectal abscess with anal fistula was found in 418 patients, and anorectal abscess without anal fistula was found in 96 patients. Microbiological examination showed that Escherichia coli, Bacteroides, Bacillus, and Klebsiella species were significantly more prevalent in patients with fistula (P<0.01), and coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Peptostreptococcus species were significantly more prevalent in patients without fistula (P<0.01). Results of endoanal ultrasonography were concordant with the definitive surgical diagnosis in 421 (94%) of 448 patients studied.
Conclusion
Acute anorectal sepsis due to colonization of “gut-derived” microorganisms rather than “skin-derived” organisms is more likely to be associated with anal fistula. When the microbiological analysis yields gut-derived bacteria, but no fistula has been found in the initial drainage operation, repeat examinations during a period of quiescence, including careful digital assessment and meticulous endosonography, are warranted to identify a potentially missed anal fistula.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Whitehead SM, Leach RD, Eykyn SJ, Phillips I (1982) The aetiology of perirectal sepsis. Br J Surg 69:166–168
Grace RH, Harper IA, Thompson RG (1982) Anorectal sepsis: microbiology in relation to fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 69:401–403
Eykyn SJ, Grace RH (1986) The relevance of microbiology in the management of anorectal sepsis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 68:237–239
Henrichsen S, Christiansen J (1986) Incidence of fistula-in-ano complicating anorectal sepsis: a prospective study. Br J Surg 73:371–372
Nicholls G, Heaton ND, Lewis AM (1990) Use of bacteriology in anorectal sepsis as an indicator of anal fistula: experience in a distinct general hospital. J R Soc Med 83:625–626
Lunniss PJ, Phillips RK (1994) Surgical assessment of acute anorectal sepsis is a better predictor of fistula than microbiological analysis. Br J Surg 81:368–369
Brook I, Frazier EH (1997) The aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology of perirectal abscesses. J Clin Microbiol 35:2974–2976
Stoker J, Rociu E, Wiersma TG, Lameris JS (2000) Imaging of anorectal disease. Br J Surg 87:10–27
Kumar A, Scholefield JH (2000) Endosonography of the anal canal and rectum. World J Surg 24:208–215
Hussain SM, Stoker J, Schouten WR, Hop WC, Lameris JS (1996) Fistula in ano: endoanal sonography versus endoanal MR imaging in classification. Radiology 200:475–481
Choen S, Burnett S, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ (1991) Comparison between anal endosonography and digital examination in the evaluation of anal fistulae. Br J Surg 78:445–447
Law PJ, Talbot RW, Bartram CI, Northover JM (1989) Anal endosonography in the evaluation of perianal sepsis and fistula in ano. Br J Surg 76:752–755
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toyonaga, T., Matsushima, M., Tanaka, Y. et al. Microbiological analysis and endoanal ultrasonography for diagnosis of anal fistula in acute anorectal sepsis. Int J Colorectal Dis 22, 209–213 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-006-0121-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-006-0121-x