Skip to main content
Log in

Microbiological analysis and endoanal ultrasonography for diagnosis of anal fistula in acute anorectal sepsis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Treatment of anorectal sepsis requires prompt surgical drainage, but it is important to identify any associated anal fistula for preventing recurrence. We evaluated whether microbiological analysis and/or endoanal ultrasonography could be used to predict anal fistula in patients with acute anorectal sepsis.

Methods

Five hundred fourteen consecutive patients with acute anorectal sepsis were studied. Clinical data, digital examination findings, endosonographic findings, and results of microbiological analysis were compared with definitive surgical findings of the presence or absence of anal fistula.

Results

Anorectal abscess with anal fistula was found in 418 patients, and anorectal abscess without anal fistula was found in 96 patients. Microbiological examination showed that Escherichia coli, Bacteroides, Bacillus, and Klebsiella species were significantly more prevalent in patients with fistula (P<0.01), and coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Peptostreptococcus species were significantly more prevalent in patients without fistula (P<0.01). Results of endoanal ultrasonography were concordant with the definitive surgical diagnosis in 421 (94%) of 448 patients studied.

Conclusion

Acute anorectal sepsis due to colonization of “gut-derived” microorganisms rather than “skin-derived” organisms is more likely to be associated with anal fistula. When the microbiological analysis yields gut-derived bacteria, but no fistula has been found in the initial drainage operation, repeat examinations during a period of quiescence, including careful digital assessment and meticulous endosonography, are warranted to identify a potentially missed anal fistula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whitehead SM, Leach RD, Eykyn SJ, Phillips I (1982) The aetiology of perirectal sepsis. Br J Surg 69:166–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grace RH, Harper IA, Thompson RG (1982) Anorectal sepsis: microbiology in relation to fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 69:401–403

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eykyn SJ, Grace RH (1986) The relevance of microbiology in the management of anorectal sepsis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 68:237–239

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Henrichsen S, Christiansen J (1986) Incidence of fistula-in-ano complicating anorectal sepsis: a prospective study. Br J Surg 73:371–372

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholls G, Heaton ND, Lewis AM (1990) Use of bacteriology in anorectal sepsis as an indicator of anal fistula: experience in a distinct general hospital. J R Soc Med 83:625–626

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lunniss PJ, Phillips RK (1994) Surgical assessment of acute anorectal sepsis is a better predictor of fistula than microbiological analysis. Br J Surg 81:368–369

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brook I, Frazier EH (1997) The aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology of perirectal abscesses. J Clin Microbiol 35:2974–2976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stoker J, Rociu E, Wiersma TG, Lameris JS (2000) Imaging of anorectal disease. Br J Surg 87:10–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar A, Scholefield JH (2000) Endosonography of the anal canal and rectum. World J Surg 24:208–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hussain SM, Stoker J, Schouten WR, Hop WC, Lameris JS (1996) Fistula in ano: endoanal sonography versus endoanal MR imaging in classification. Radiology 200:475–481

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Choen S, Burnett S, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ (1991) Comparison between anal endosonography and digital examination in the evaluation of anal fistulae. Br J Surg 78:445–447

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Law PJ, Talbot RW, Bartram CI, Northover JM (1989) Anal endosonography in the evaluation of perianal sepsis and fistula in ano. Br J Surg 76:752–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takayuki Toyonaga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toyonaga, T., Matsushima, M., Tanaka, Y. et al. Microbiological analysis and endoanal ultrasonography for diagnosis of anal fistula in acute anorectal sepsis. Int J Colorectal Dis 22, 209–213 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-006-0121-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-006-0121-x

Keywords

Navigation