Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of physical functions and psychosocial conditions between adolescents with pectus excavatum, pectus carinatum and healthy controls

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The present study aimed to compare the physical and psychosocial conditions of adolescents with pectus excavatum (PE) and pectus carinatum (PC), who had mild-severe deformities, with those of healthy controls (HC).

Methods

This study included 180 adolescents (aged 10–18 years) with pectus deformity [PE (n = 90) and PC (n = 90)] and 90 age-matched HC. The following parameters were evaluated for each participant: clinical parameters, perceived appearance of the chest area (PAC), physical functions (grip strength, flexibility, muscle strength, endurance, physical activity), posture, psychosocial conditions, and quality of life (QOL).

Results

Patients with PE and PC had a lower body weight, a worse, a poorer posture, lower scores for physical functions compared to the HC group (p < 0.001, all). The PE group had lower scores (p < 0.05) for some psychosocial conditions and quality of life subscales compared to the HC and PC (except for the QOL) group (p < 0.05). The PC group had a poorer posture compared to the PE group (p < 0.05). PAC was associated with physical functions and psychosocial status (r = 0.19–0.40, p < 0.05) but pectus severity was not associated with these parameters (r = 0.02–0.12, p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Our results indicate that all adolescents with mild, moderate, or severe pectus deformity should undergo a biopsychosocial evaluation, receive psychosocial support, and be referred for physiotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blanco FC, Elliott ST, Sandler AD (2011) Management of congenital chest wall deformities. Semin Plast Surg 25:107–116. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1275177

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Shamberger RC (1994) Chest wall deformities. In: Shields TW (ed) General thoracic surgery. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 529–557

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kuhn MA, Nuss D (2011) Pectus deformities. In: Mattei P (ed) Fundamentals of pediatric surgery. Springer, New York, pp 313–322

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Welch KJ (1958) Satisfactory surgical correction of pektus excavatum deformity in childhood. J Thorac Surg 36:697–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-5588(20)30116-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morhuis WJ, Mulder H, Wapperom G et al (1992) Pectus excavatum. a clinical study with longterm postoperative follow-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 6:318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/1010-7940(92)90149-r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Quigley PM, Haller JA Jr, Jelus KL, Loughin GM, Marcus CL (1996) Cardiorespiratory function before and after corrective surgery in pektus excavatum. J Pediatr 128:638–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(96)80128-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Einsiedel E, Clausner A, Funnel Chest (1999) Psychological and psychosomatic aspects in children, youngsters, and young adults. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 40:733–736

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roberts J, Hayashi A, Anderson JO, Martin JM, Maxwell LL (2003) Quality of life of patients who have undergone the Nuss procedure for pektus excavatum: preliminary findings. J Pediatr Surg 38:779–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/jpsu.2003.50166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Steinmann C, Krille S, Mueller A et al (2011) Pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum patients suffer from lower quality of life and impaired body image: a control group comparison of psychological characteristics prior to surgical correction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40(5):1138–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly RE Jr, Cash TF, Shamberger RC et al (2008) Surgical repair of pektus excavatum markedly improves body image and perceived ability for physical activity: multicenter study. Pediatrics 122:1218–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Krasopoulos G, Dusmet M, Ladas G, Goldstraw P et al (2006) Nuss procedure improves the quality of life in young male adults with pectus excavatum deformity. Eur J Cardıo-Thorac 29:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shneerson JM (2005) Rehabilitation in thoracic wall deformities. In: Donner CF, Ambrossino N, Goldstein RS (eds) Pulmonary rehabilitation, 1st edn. Edward Arnold, New York, pp 266–277

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozyılmaz S (2015) Pulmonary rehabilitation in chest wall deformities. Toraks Cerrahisi Bülteni 6:91–96. https://doi.org/10.5152/tcb.2015.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rowland T, Moriarty K, Banever G (2005) Effect of pectus excavatum deformity on cardiorespiratory fitness in adolescent boys. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 159(11):1069–1073. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.159.11.1069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly RE, Shamberger RC (2012) Congenital wall deformities. In: Coran AG, Adzick NS, Krummel TM, Laberge JM (eds) Pediatric Surgery, 7th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 779–808

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Akkaş Y, Peri NG, Koçer B, Gülbahar G, Aksakal FNB (2018) The prevalence of chest wall deformity in Turkish children. Turk J Med Scı 48(6):1200–1206. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1807-180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ewert F, Syed J, Wagner S et al (2017) Does an external chest wall measurement correlate with a CT-based measurement in patients with chest wall deformities? J Pediatr Surg 52(10):1583–1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.04.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Canavan PK, Cahalin L (2008) Integrated physical therapy intervention for a person with pectus excavatum and bilateral shoulder pain: a single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89(11):2195–2204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.04.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Magee DJ (1987) Orthopedic physical assessment. Gait assessment chapter 13. W.B.Saunders Company, Toronto, pp 362–376

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dunkan M, Howard AW (1991) Physiological testing of the high—performance athlete, 2nd edn. Human Kineties Boks Champaign, IlIionis, pp 330–333

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jackson AW, Morrow JR, Brill PA, Kohl HW, Gordon NF, Blair SN (1998) Relations of sit-up and sit-and-reach tests to low back pain in adults. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 27(1):22–26. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1998.27.1.22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hannibal NS III, Plowman SA, Looney MA, Brandenburg J (2006) Reliability and validity of low back strength/muscular endurance field tests in adolescents. J Phys Act Health 3(Suppl. S2):78–89. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.3.s2.s78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sinaki M (1989) Relationship of muscle strength of back and upper extremity with level of physical activity in healthy women. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 68:134–138. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-198906000-00007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S (1985) Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66:69–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, Stewart SM (2011) Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phy 8(1):115. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, Inal-Ince D, Bosnak-Guclu M, Karabulut E, Tokgozoglu L (2010) International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills 111(1):278–284. https://doi.org/10.2466/06.08.PMS.111.4.278-284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Deragotis LR (1992) The brief symptom ınventory (BSI); administration scoring and procedures manual-II. II. Clinical Psychometric Research Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sahin NH, Durak A (1994) A study of the brief symptom ınventory in Turkish youth. Turk J Psyc 9(31):44–56

    Google Scholar 

  29. Secord PF, Jourard SM (1953) The appraisal of body-cathexis: bodycathexis and the self. J Consult Psychol 17:343–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hovardaoğlu S (1990) Üniversite öğrencilerinde depresyon düzeyinin kontrol inancı ve kendi vücudunu algılamayla ilişkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi 34:131–140

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hart TA, Flora DB, Palyo SA, Fresco D, Holle C, Heimberg RC (2008) Development and examination of the social appearance anxiety scala. Assessment 15:48–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107306673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Doğan T (2010) Sosyal Görünüş Kaygısı Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 39:151–159

    Google Scholar 

  33. La Greca AM, Dandes SK, Wick P et al (1988) Development of the social anxiety scale for children: reliability and concurrent validity. J Clin Child Psychol 17:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1701_11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. La Greca LJ, Lopez N (1998) Social anxiety among adolescents: linkages with peer relations and friendships. J Abnorm Child Psychol 26:83–94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022684520514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aydın A, Sütçü TS (2007) Ergenler için sosyal kaygı ölçeği’ nin geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin incelenmesi. Turk J Child Adolesc Ment Health 14(2):79–89

    Google Scholar 

  36. Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA (1999) The PedsQLTM: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care 37(2):126–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199902000-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS (2001) PedsQLTM 4.0: Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTMVersion 4.0 Generic Core Scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pilegaard HK (2016) Growth and pectus excavatum: is there a relation? Eur J Cardio-Thorac 50(6):1110. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Park HJ, Sung SW, Park JK, Kim JJ, Jeon HW, Wang YP (2012) How early can we repair pectus excavatum: the earlier the better? Eur J Cardio-Thorac 42(4):667–672. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezs130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hebra A (2009) Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 21(1):76–84. https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2016.03.21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Saxena AK (2005) Pectus excavatum, pectus carinatum and other forms of thoracic deformities. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 10:147–157. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.16964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Koumbourlis AC (2009) Pectus excavatum: pathophysiology and clinical characteristics. Paedıatr Respır Rev 10(1):3–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2008.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Harris DL (1982) The symptomatology of abnormal appearance. Br J Plast Surg 35:281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(82)90120-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Archer R, Cash TF (1985) Physical attractiveness and maladjustment among psychiatric inpatients. J Soc Clin Psychol 3:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1985.3.2.170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cash TF (1985) Physical appearance and mental health. In: Graham JA, Kligman AM (eds) The psychology of cosmetic treatments. Praeger Scientific, New York, pp 196–132

    Google Scholar 

  47. Noles SW, Cash TF, Winstead BA (1985) Body-image, physical attractiveness, and depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 53:88–94. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.53.1.88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pruzinsky T, Cash TF (1990) Medical interventions for the enhancement of adolescents’ physical appearance: Implications for social competence. In: Gullotta TP, Adams GR, Montemayor R (eds) Developing social competency in adolescence. England, Sage, London, pp 220–242

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cash TF, Fleming EC (2002) The impact of body image experiences: development of the body image quality of life inventory. Int J Eat Disord 31:455–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Fonkalsrud EW, Dunn JCY, Atkinson JB (2000) Repair of pectus excavatum deformities: 30 years experience with 375 patients. Ann Surg 231:443–448. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200003000-00019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Fonkalsrud EW, Bustorff-Silva J (1999) Repair of pectus excavatum and carinatum in adults. Am J Surg 177:121–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00316-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pawlak K, Gąsiorowski Ł, Gabryel P, Gałęcki B, Zieliński P, Dyszkiewicz W (2016) Early and late results of the Nuss procedure in surgical treatment of pectus excavatum in different age groups. Ann Thorac Surg 102(5):1711–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kim DH, Hwang JJ, Lee MK, Lee DY, Paik HC (2005) Analysis of the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum in different age groups. Ann Thorac Surg 80(3):1073–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Alaca N, Alaca I, Yüksel M (2020) Does physiotherapy applied in conjunction with compression brace treatment in patients with pectus carinatum have efficacy? A preliminary randomized-controlled study. Pediatr Surg Int 36:789–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04675-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Alaca N, Alaca I, Yüksel M (2020) Physiotherapy in addition to vacuum bell therapy in patients with pectus excavatum. ICVTS 31(5):650–656. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaa161

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The first draft of the manuscript was written by NA and MY commented on the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuray Alaca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The Research Ethics Committee of Acıbadem University and Acıbadem Healthcare Group has approved the study (reference no. ATADEK-2019–14/15). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alaca, N., Yüksel, M. Comparison of physical functions and psychosocial conditions between adolescents with pectus excavatum, pectus carinatum and healthy controls. Pediatr Surg Int 37, 765–775 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-04857-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-04857-7

Keywords

Navigation