Abstract
Purpose
To describe the association of anorectal malformation (ARM) and spinal dysraphism (SD) in terms of impact on the management of SD and embryogenetic implications.
Methods
Patients with SD associated with (A) or without (B) ARM were included. The two groups were further divided into operated on (A1/B1) or not (A2/B2) for SD. Groups A and B were compared for type of SD (embryogenetic classification) and prevalence of neurosurgery; Groups A1 vs. A2 for type of ARM (Wingspread classification); Groups A1 vs. B1 for age at neurosurgery, neurophysiology, and clinical symptoms.
Main results
One hundred twenty-one patients with SD, 83 with and 38 without ARM were consecutively treated (1999–2015). Group A was associated only with SDs developing after primary neurulation, corresponding to the period of cloacal septation and organogenesis (p = 0.0007). Untethering surgery was significantly less frequent in Group A (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.04, respectively). Higher ARMs were not associated with increased risk for neurosurgery. No other significant differences were detected.
Conclusions
In our series, ARMs were associated only with SD developing after primary neurulation, suggesting a single insult leading to both SD and the associated ARM. Neurosurgery is indicated less frequently in patients with ARM-associated SD, despite the similar preoperative clinical features.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Uchida K, Inoue M, Matsubara T, Otake K, Koike Y, Okugawa Y et al (2007) Evaluation and treatment for spinal cord tethering in patients with anorectal malformations. Eur J Pediatr Surg 17(6):408–411
Totonelli G, Catania VD, Morini F, Fusaro F, Mosiello G, Iacobelli BD, Bagolan P (2015) VACTERL association in anorectal malformation: effect on the outcome. Pediatr Surg Int 31(9):805–808. doi:10.1007/s00383-015-3745-5
Van den Hondel D, Sloots C, de Jong TH, Lequin M, Wijnen R (2016) Screening and treatment of tethered spinal cord in anorectal malformation patients. Eur J Pediatr Surg 26(1):22–28. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1563673
Scottoni F, Iacobelli BD, Zaccara AM, Totonelli G, Schingo AM, Bagolan P (2014) Spinal ultrasound in patients with anorectal malformations: is this the end of an era? Pediatr Surg Int 30(8):829–831. doi:10.1007/s00383-014-3546-2
Stephens FD, Durham-Smith E (1986) Classification, identification, and assessment of surgical treatment of anorectal anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int 1:200–205
Morota N, Ihara S, Ogiwara H (2017) New classification of spinal lipomas based on embryonic stage. J Neurosurg Pediatr 19(4):428–439
McComb JC (2015) A practical clinical classification of spinal neural tube defects. Childs Nerv Syst 31(10):1641–1657. doi:10.1007/s00381-015-2845-9
Kluth D (2010) Embryology of anorectal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg 19(3):201–208. doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2010.03.005 (review)
Tuuha SE, Aziz D, Drake J, Wales P, Kim PC (2004) Is surgery necessary for asymptomatic tethered cord in anorectal malformation patients? J Pediatr Surg 39(5):773–777
Kyrklund K, Pakarinen MP, Taskinen S, Kivisaari R, Rintala RJ (2016) Spinal cord anomalies in patients with anorectal malformations without severe sacral abnormalities or meningomyelocele: outcomes after expectant, conservative management. J Neurosurg Spine 25(6):782–789
Totonelli G, Morini F, Catania VD, Schingo PM, Mosiello G, Palma P, Iacobelli BD, Bagolan P (2016) Anorectal malformations associated spinal cord anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int 32(8):729–735
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Totonelli, G., Messina, R., Morini, F. et al. Embryological and clinical implications of the association between anorectal malformations and spinal dysraphisms. Pediatr Surg Int 33, 843–847 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4104-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4104-5