Skip to main content
Log in

Duodeno-duodenostomy or duodeno-jejunostomy for duodenal atresia: is one repair better than the other?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The surgical management of neonates with duodenal atresia (DA) involves re-establishment of intestinal continuity, either by duodeno-duodenostomy (DD) or by duodeno-jejunostomy (DJ). Although the majority of pediatric surgeons perform DD repair preferentially, we aimed to analyze the outcome of DA neonates treated with either surgical technique.

Methods

Following ethical approval (REB:1000047737), we retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent DA repair between 2004 and 2014. Patients with associated esophageal/intestinal atresias and/or anorectal malformations were excluded. Outcome measures included demographics (gender, gestational age, and birth weight), length of mechanical ventilation, time to first and full feed, length of hospital admission, weight at discharge (z-scores), and postoperative complications (anastomotic stricture/leak, adhesive obstruction, and need for re-laparotomy). Both DD and DJ groups were compared using parametric or non-parametric tests, with data presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range).

Results

During the study period, 92 neonates met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 47 (51%) had DD and 45 (49%) DJ repair. All procedures were performed open, apart from one laparoscopic DJ. Overall, DD and DJ groups had similar demographics. Likewise, we found no differences between the two groups for length of ventilation (p = 0.6), time to first feed (p = 0.5), time to full feed (p = 0.4), length of admission (p = 0.6), prokinetic use (p = 0.5), nor weight at discharge (p = 0.1). When the 30/92 (33%) patients with trisomy-21 (DD = 16, DJ = 14) were excluded from analysis, the groups still had similar weight at discharge (p = 0.2). Postoperative complication rate was not different between the two groups. One patient per group died, due to respiratory failure (DD) and sepsis (DJ).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that in neonates with duodenal atresia, duodeno-duodenostomy and duodeno-jejunostomy have similar outcomes. These findings are relevant for surgeons who repair duodenal atresia laparoscopically, as duodeno-jejunostomy had equal clinical outcomes and may be easier to perform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Applebaum H, Sydorak R (2013) Duodenal atresia and stenosis—annular pancreas. In: Coran A, Adzick NS, Krummel T, Laberge JM, Shamberger R, Caldamone A (eds) Pediatric surgery, 7th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1051–1057

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gray SW, Skandalakis JE (1986) Embryology for surgeons: the embryological basis for treatment of congenital defects. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ernst NP (1916) A case of congenital atresia of the duodenum treated successfully by operation. Br Med J 1:644–645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Loitman C (1927) Congenital occlusion of the intestine. Boston Med Surg J 197:21–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ward CS, Cooper FW (1943) Atresia of the duodenum: a case successfully treated by duodenoduodenostomy. Ann Surg 117:718–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gross RE (1953) The surgery of infancy and childhood; its principles and techniques. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kimura K, Tsugawa C, Ogawa K et al (1977) Diamond-shaped anastomosis for congenital duodenal obstruction. Arch Surg 112:1262–1263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stauffer UG, Irving I (1977) Duodenal atresia and stenosis—long term results. Prog Pediatr Surg 10:49–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spigland N, Yazbeck S (1990) Complications associated with surgical treatment of congenital intrinsic duodenal obstruction. J Pediatr Surg 25:1127–1130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grosfeld JL, Rescorla FJ (1993) Duodenal atresia and stenosis: reassessment of treatment and outcome based on antenatal diagnosis, pathologic variance, and long-term follow-up. World J Surg 17:301–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bax NM, Ure BM, van der Zee DC et al (2001) Laparoscopic duodenoduodenostomy for duodenal atresia. Surg Endosc 15:217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Parmentier B, Peycelon M, Muller C et al (2015) Laparoscopic management of congenital duodenal atresia or stenosis: a single-center early experience. J Pediatr Surg 50:1833–1836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Augusto Zani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zani, A., Yeh, JP.B., King, S.K. et al. Duodeno-duodenostomy or duodeno-jejunostomy for duodenal atresia: is one repair better than the other?. Pediatr Surg Int 33, 245–248 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-4016-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-4016-9

Keywords

Navigation