Abstract
We describe the treatment of a patient with long-gap esophageal atresia with an upper pouch fistula, mircogastria and minimal distal esophageal remnant. After 4.5 months of feeding via gastrostomy, a proximal fistula was identified by bronchoscopy and a thoracoscopic modified Foker procedure was performed reducing the gap from approximately 7–5 cm over 2 weeks of traction. A second stage to ligate the fistula and suture approximate the proximal and distal esophagus resulted in a gap of 1.5 cm. IRB and FDA approval was then obtained for endoscopic placement of 10-French catheter mounted magnets in the proximal and distal pouches promoting a magnetic compression anastomosis (magnamosis). Magnetic coupling occurred at 4 days and after magnet removal at 13 days an esophagram demonstrated a 10 French channel without leak. Serial endoscopic balloon dilation has allowed drainage of swallowed secretions as the baby learns bottling behavior at home.
References
Eraklis AJ, Rossello PJ, Ballantine TV (1976) Circular esophagomyotomy of upper pouch in primary repair of long-segment esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 11:709–712
Gough MH (1980) Esophageal atresia—use of an anterior flap in the difficult anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg 15:310–311
Foker JE, Linden BC, Boyle EM Jr et al (1997) Development of a true primary repair for the full spectrum of esophageal atresia. Ann Surg 226:533
Bagolan P, Iacobelli B, De Angelis P et al (2004) Long gap esophageal atresia and esophageal replacement: moving toward a separation? J Pediatr Surg 39:1084–1090
Zaritzky M, Ben R, Johnston K (2014) Magnetic gastrointestinal anastomosis in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg 49:1131–1137
Rothenberg SS (2013) Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula in neonates, first decade’s experience. Dis Esophagus 26:359–364
Hendren WH, Hale JR (1975) Electromagnetic bougienage to lengthen esophageal segments in congenital esophageal atresia. N Engl J Med 293:428–432
Cope C (1995) Creation of compression gastroenterostomy by means of the oral, percutaneous, or surgical introduction of magnets: feasibility study in swine. J Vasc Interv Radiol 6:539–545
Murphy JB (1892) Cholecysto-intestinal, gastro-intestinal, entero-intestinal anastomosis and approximation without sutures:(original research), vol 42. Printing and Bookbinding Co., New York, pp 665–673
Yamanouchi E (1998) A new interventional method: magnetic compression anastomosis with rare-earth magnets. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol (United States) 21:S155
Haruta H, Yamanouchi E, Hosoya Y et al (2011) Magnetic compression anastomosis of a severe anastomotic stenosis after esophagoesophagostomy for long gap esophageal atresia: a case report. Gastroenterol Endosc 53:2001–2005
Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Clay JG et al (2009) Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. J Pediatr Surg 44:222–228
Pichakron KO, Jelin EB, Hirose S et al (2011) Magnamosis II: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy. J Am Coll Surg 212:42–49
Zaritzky M, Ben R, Zylberg GI et al (2009) Magnetic compression anastomosis as a nonsurgical treatment for esophageal atresia. Pediatr Radiol 39:945–949
Lovvorn HN, Baron CM, Danko ME et al (2014) Staged repair of esophageal atresia: pouch approximation and catheter-based magnetic anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg Case Reports 2:170–175
Acknowledgments
Cook Medical provided the device used in this patient.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Dr. Zaritzky is an advisor and proctor for Cook Medical, and shares the patent and future royalty payments pending catheter-based magnetic device commercialization. The other authors have no relevant disclosures.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dorman, R.M., Vali, K., Harmon, C.M. et al. Repair of esophageal atresia with proximal fistula using endoscopic magnetic compression anastomosis (magnamosis) after staged lengthening. Pediatr Surg Int 32, 525–528 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3889-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3889-y