Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic versus open repair of recto-bladderneck and recto-prostatic anorectal malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The laparoscopically-assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) for recto-bladderneck and recto-prostatic anorectal malformations (RB/RP-ARMs) is believed to improve patient outcomes. We performed a systematic review of the effect of LAARP on postoperative mucosal prolapse and defecation dysfunction.

Methods

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and grey literature was performed (2000–2014). Full-text screening, data abstraction and quality appraisal were conducted in duplicate. Included studies reported a primary diagnosis of RB/RP-ARM and compared LAARP versus open repair (OPEN).

Results

From 3681 retrieved articles, 7 studies enrolling 187 patients were analyzed. One was a randomized control trial, 6 were retrospective observational studies, and all were single-centre. The majority were of poor-moderate quality (MINORS scores: mean 16.42 (SD 2.225) out of 24). Mucosal prolapse was not significantly different after LAARP versus OPEN (p = 0.18). Defecation outcomes were inconsistently reported but were no different between LAARP and OPEN for either children >3 years old (p = 0.84), or all ages combined (p = 0.11).

Conclusion

We found no significant difference in rates of mucosal prolapse or defecation scores for LAARP compared to OPEN for children with RB/RP-ARMs. However, studies are small and of poor-moderate quality and results are heterogeneous. Comprehensive, standardized, reliable reporting is necessary to guide practice and inform postoperative guidelines.

Level of evidence

1c.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coran AG, Caldamone A, Adzick NS, Krummel TM, Laberge JM, Shamberger R (2012) Pediatric Surgery, 7th edn. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brenner E (1915) Congenital defects of the anus and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 220:579–598

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stephens FD, Smith ED, Paoul NW (1998) Anorectal malformations in children: update 1988. March of Dimes Birth Defect Foundation Original series, Vol. 24 (4). New York, NY: Alan R. Liss Inc

  4. Holschneider A, Hutson J, Pena A et al (2005) Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations. J Pediatr Surg 40:1521–1526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levitt MA, Pena A (2007) Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2:33–45

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bischoff A, Tovilla M (2010) A practical approach to the management of pediatric fecal incontinence. Semin Pediatr Surg 19:154–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. deVries PA, Pena A (1982) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 17:638–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Okada A, Kamata S, Fukuzawa M et al (1992) Anterior sagittal anorectoplasty for rectovestibular and anovestibular fistula. J Pediatr Surg 27:85–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Willital GH (1998) Endosurgical intrapuborectal reconstruction of high anorectal anomalies. Pediatr Endosurg Innov Tech 2:5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Georgeson KE, Inge TH, Albanese CT (2000) Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus—a new technique. J Pediatr Surg 35:927–930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Attard JP, MacLean AR (2007) Adhesive small bowel obstruction: epidemiology, biology and prevention. Can J Surg 504:291–300

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ponsky TA, Rothenberg SS (2008) Minimally invasive surgery in infants less than 5 kg: experience of 649 cases. Surg Endosc 22:2214–2219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walsh PC, Schlegel PN (1998) Radical pelvic surgery with preservation of sexual function. Ann Surg 208:391–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bischoff A, Levitt MA, Peña A (2011) Laparoscopy and its use in the repair of anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 46:1609–1617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li X, Zhang J, Sang L et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy- a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 10:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin CL, Wong KKY, Lan LC et al (2003) Earlier appearance and higher incidence of the rectoanal relaxation reflex in patients with imperforate anus repaired with laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty. Surg Endosc 17:1646–1649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D et al (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Braga LH, Mijovic H, Farrokhyar F et al (2013) Antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections in antenatal hydronephrosis. Pediatrics 131:e251–e261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Holschneider AM, Hutson JM (2006) Anorectal Malformations in Children. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kelly JH (1972) The clinical and radiological assessment of anal continence in childhood. Aust NZ J Surg 42:62–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rintala RJ, Lindahl H (1995) Is normal bowel function possible after repair of intermediate and high anorectal malformations? J Pediatr Surg 30:491–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bai Y, Yuan Z, Wang W et al (2000) Quality of life for children with fecal incontinence after surgically corrected anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 35:462–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hassnick EA, Rieu PN, Brugman AT et al (1994) Quality of life after operatively corrected high anorectal malformation: a long-term follow-up study of patients aged 18 years and older. J Pediatr Surg 29:773–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Higgens JP (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 15:1539–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Steward DJ (1982) Preterm infants are more prone to complications following minor surgery than are term infants. Anesthesiology 56:304–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun L (2010) Early childhood general anaesthesia exposure and neurocognitive development. Brit J Anaesth 105:i61–i68

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Boemers T, Beek F, van Gool J et al (1996) Urologic problems in anorectal malformations. Part 1: urodynamic findings and significance of sacral anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 31:407–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Boemers T, de Jong T, van Gool J et al (1996) Urologic problems in anorectal malformations. Part 2: functional urologic sequelae. J Pediatr Surg 31:634–637

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Higgins JPT, Green S (2009) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org; Accessed August 25, 1014

  30. Grade Working Group (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490–1494

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. GRADEpro (2008) [Computer program]. Version 3.2 for Windows. Jan Brozek, Andrew Oxman, Holger Schünemann

  32. Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp

  34. Review Manager (RevMan) (2008) [Computer program]. Version 5.0. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration

  35. Bailez MM, Cuenca ES, Mauri V et al (2011) Outcome of males with high anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 46:473–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. England RJ, Warren SL, Bezuidenhout L et al (2012) Laparoscopic repair of anorectal malformations at the Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital: taking stock. J Pediatr Surg 47:565–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kimura O, Iwai N, Sasaki Y et al (2010) Laparoscopic versus open abdominoperineal rectoplasty for infants with high-type anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 45:2390–2393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Koga H, Miyano G, Takahashi T et al (2010) Comparison of anorectal angle and continence after Georgeson and Peña procedures for high/intermediate imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg 45:2394–2397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tong Q, Tang S, Pu J et al (2011) Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus in infants: intermediate results. J Pediatr Surg 46:1578–1586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang J, Zhang W, Feng J et al (2009) Comparison of clinical outcomes and anorectal manometry in patients with congenital anorectal malformations treated with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull through. J Pediatr Surg 44:2380–2383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wood AH (1993) Pulmonary surfactant therapy. NEJM 328:861–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Veyrac C, Couture A, Saguintaah M et al (2004) MRI of fetal GI tract abnormalities. Abdom Imaging 29:411–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Al-Hozaim O, Al-Maary J, AlQahtani A et al (2010) Laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations: a systematic review and the need for standardization of outcome reporting. J Pediatr Surg 45:1500–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Beck CA (2009) Selection bias in observational studies: out of control? Neurology 72:108–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B et al (2007) Associated malformations in patients with anorectal anomalies. Eur J Med Genet 50:281–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Levitt MA, Patel M, Rodriguez G et al (1997) The tethered spinal cord in patients with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 32:462–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Belizon A, Levitt M, Shoshany G et al (2005) Rectal prolapse following posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 40:192–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Laberge JM (1997) The anterior sagittal approach to the treatment of anorectal malformations: evolution of the Mollard approach. Semin Pediatr Surg 6:196–203

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hartman EE, Oort FJ, Aronson DC et al (2011) Quality of life and disease-specific functioning of patients with anorectal malformations or Hirschsprung’s disease: a review. Arch Dis Child 96:398–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Diseth TH, Egeland T, Emblem R (1998) Effects of anal invasive treatment and incontinence on mental health and psychosocial functioning of adolescents with Hirschsprung’s disease and low anorectal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 33:468–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Langemeijer RA, Molenaar JC (1991) Continence after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 26:587–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. deVries PA, Cox KL (1985) Surgery of anorectal anomalies. Surg Clin North Am 65:1139–1169

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Rintala R, Lindahl H, Louhimo I (1991) Anorectal malformations - results of treatment and long-term follow-up in 208 patients. Peditri Surg Int 6:36–41

    Google Scholar 

  54. Levitt MA, Pena A (2005) Outcomes from the correction of anorectal malformation. Curr Opin Pediatr 17:394–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hassett S, Snell S, Hughes-Thomas A et al (2009) 10-Year outcome of children born with anorectal malformation, treated by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, assessed according to the Krickenbeck classification. J Pediatr Surg 44:399–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rintala RJ, Pakarinen MP (2008) Imperforate anus: long- and short-term outcome. Semin Pediatr Surg 17:79–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP et al (2003) Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surgeons 197:177–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Pena A, Hong A (2000) Advances in the management of anorectal malformations. Am J Surg 80:370–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Vinnicombe SJ, Good CD, Hall CM (1996) Posterior urethral diverticula: a complication of surgery for high anorectal malformations. Pediatr Radiol 26:120–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lopez PJ, Guelfand M, Angel L et al (2010) Urethral diverticulum after laparoscopically-assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) for anorectal malformation: is resection of the diverticulum always necessary? Arch Esp Urol 63:297–301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Koga H, Okazaki T, Yamataka A et al (2005) Posterior urethral diverticulum after laparoscopic-assisted repair of high-type anorectal malformation in a male patient: surgical treatment and prevention. Pediatr Surg Int 21:58–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Alam S, Lawal TA, Pena A et al (2011) Acquired posterior urethral diverticulum following surgery for anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 46:1231–1235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sheldon CA, Gilbert A, Lewis AG et al (1994) Surgical implications of genitourinary anomalies in patients with imperforate anus. J Urol 152:196–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Choby BA, George S (2008) Toilet Training. Am Fam Physician 8:1059–1064

    Google Scholar 

  65. Witvliet MJ, Slaar A, Heij HA et al (2013) Qualitative analysis of studies concerning quality of life in children and adults with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 48:372–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Grano C, Aminoff A, Lucidi F et al (2011) Long-term disease-specific quality of life in adult anorectal malformation patients. J Pediatr Surg 46:691–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Neera Bhatnagar for her assistance with the search strategy, and Molly Barber for her assistance with editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna C. Shawyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shawyer, A.C., Livingston, M.H., Cook, D.J. et al. Laparoscopic versus open repair of recto-bladderneck and recto-prostatic anorectal malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 31, 17–30 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3626-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3626-3

Keywords

Navigation