Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of preoperative diagnosis of congenital heart disease on the treatment of esophageal atresia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Congenital heart disease (CHD) has a major impact on the survival of babies with esophageal atresia (EA). The present study assesses whether early diagnosis influences the management strategies in a large series of EA. Cases of EA treated between 1982 and 2002 were retrospectively divided into groups according to the presence or absence of CHD and to whether this was diagnosed or not prior to tracheo-esophageal fistula repair. Patients were also staged according to Spitz’s classification in which major congenital heart disease (MCHD) are those associated with cyanosis and/or heart failure requiring surgery. Comparisons between groups of patients were made by standard statistical tests. Among 195 babies with EA (99 boys and 96 girls), 82 (42%) had CHD (31 boys, 39% and 51 girls, 61%, χ2 P<0.05) and 43 out of these 82 (52%) had MCHD. Six children died without treatment. CHD was diagnosed prenatally in six cases and before EA repair in 26 cases. The diagnoses were missed in 12 instances (in five it was a MCHD). Regardless of preoperative diagnosis of right aortic arch in 3/6 cases, the oesophagus was approached from the right thorax in all cases and only in one of them the operation was not completed due to hemodynamic instability. There were 145/195 (75%) Spitz group I patients; 44/195 (22%) were group II and 6/195 (3%) group III. The mortality was respectively 9.5, 59 and 83%. We lost 15/113 (13%) babies with EA without CHD, 4/39 (10.2%) with EA and CHD and 26/43 (60%) with EA and MCHD. In children with CHD diagnosed prior to the esophageal operation 8/26 (30.7%) died and among those without diagnoses 3/12 (25%) died, (χ2 P>0.1).

  1. 1.

    CHD was diagnosed after EA repair in one-third of cases.

  2. 2.

    Preoperative diagnosis of CHD changed the operative indication only in one case.

  3. 3.

    Survival after treatment for EA was not influenced by the moment or the accuracy of the diagnosis of CHD in this series.

  4. 4.

    With only a few exceptions, associated CHD should not change the strategies of EA repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chittmittrapap S, Spitz L, Kiely EM, Brereton RJ (1989) Oesophageal atresia and associated anomalies. Arch Dis Child 64:364–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Myers NA, Beasley SW, Auldist AW (1992) Oesophageal atresia and associated anomalies: a plea of uniform documentation. Pediatr Surg Int 7:97–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Okada A, Usui N (1992) Esophageal atresia in Osaka: a review of 39 years of experience. J Pediatr Surg 32:1570–1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spitz L, Kiely EM, Morecroft JA (1994) Oesophageal atresia: at risk groups for the 1990. J Pediatr Surg 29:723–725

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Waterston DJ, Bonham Carter RE, Aberdeen E (1962) Oesophageal atresia: tracheoesophageal fistula. A study of survival of 218 infants. Lancet 1:819–822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mellins RB, Blumenthal S, Sheppard M (1964) Cardiovascular anomalies and esophageal atresia. Am J Child Dis 107:96–100

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ein SH, Shandling B, Newcastle R (1994) Pure esophageal atresia: a 50 years review. J Pediatr Surg 29:1208–1211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Holder TM, Ashcraft KW, Sharp RJ, Amoury RA (1987) Care of infants with oesophageal atresia, tracheoesophageal fistula and associated anomalies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 94:828–835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tulloh RMR, Tansey SP, Parashar K (1994) Echocardiographic screening in neonates undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal malformations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 70:206–208

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abu-Harb M, Hey E, Wren C (1993) Death in infancy from unrecognised heart disease. Arch Dis Child 71:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Touloukian RJ, Keller MS (1988) High proximal pouch esophageal atresia with vertebra, rib and sternal anomalies: an additional component to the VATER association. J Pediatr Surg 23:76–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta DK, Arora M, Srinivas M (2001) Azygos vein anomaly: the best predictor of a long gap in esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. Pediatr Surg Int 17:101–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kulkarni B, Rao RS, Oak S, Upadhyaya MA (1998) 13 pairs of ribs-a predictor of long gap atresia in tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 33:1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffman JL (1995) Incidence of congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 106:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bull C, Ashcraft KW, Sharp RJ (1999) Current and potential impact of fetal diagnosis prevalence and spectrum of serious congenital heart disease at term in the UK. Lancet 354:1242–1247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Choudhury R, Ashcraft K, Sharp R, Murphy J, Snyder CH, Sigalet D (1999) Survival of patients with esophageal atresia: influence of birth, weight, cardiac anomaly and late respiratory complications. J Pediatr Surg 34:70–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Greenwood A, Rosenthal A (1974) Cardiovascular malformations associated with tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal atresia. Pediatrics 1:87–91

    Google Scholar 

  18. Louhimo I (1999) Esophageal atresia: primary results of 500 consecutively treated patients. J Pediatr Surg 18:823–828

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bishop PJ, Klein MD, Philippart Al, Hixson DS (1983) Transpleural repair of esophageal atresia without primary gastrostomy: 240 patients treated between 1951 and 1983. J Pediatr Surg 20:823–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferenz C (1990) On the birth prevalence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 21:1701–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Otten C, Migliazza L, Xia H, Rodriguez J, Diez-Pardo JA, Tovar JA (2000) Neural crest-derived defects in experimental esophageal atresia. Pediatr Res 47:178–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morini F, Ilari M, Casati F (2001) Pattern of cardiovascular anomalies associated with esophageal atresia: support for a caudal pharyngeal arch neurocristopathy. Pediatr Res 50:565–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Driver CP, Shankar KR, Jones MO, Lamont GA, Turnok RR, LLoyd DA, Losty PD (2001) Phenotypic presentation and outcome of esophageal atresia in the era of Spitz classification. J Pediatr Surg 36:1419–1422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stringel G, Coln D, Guerrin L (1990) Esophageal atresia and right aortic arch: right or left thoracotomy. Pediatr Surg Int 5:103–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bowett B, Beasley SW, Myers NA (1999) The frequency, significance and management of right aortic arch in association with esophageal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 15:28–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Burrows P, Mc Donald C, Morecroft JA (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric thoracic aorta. Semin Ultrasound 14:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Berdon WE, Baker DH, Neilson IR (1974) Plain film detection of a right aortic arch in infants with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 14:436–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Son J (1993) Demonstration of vascular ring anatomy with CT. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 36:277–279

    Google Scholar 

  29. Harrison R, Weithman J, Waterston DJ (1980) Localization of the aortic arch prior to repair of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 15:312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. van Son J (1994) Imaging strategies for vascular rings. Ann Thorac Surg 57:604–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hands LJ, Dudley NE (1986) A comparison between gap length and Waterston classification as guides to mortality and morbidity after surgery for esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 21:404–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, P. de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain

    J. L. Encinas, A. L. Luis, L. F. Avila, L. Martinez, L. Guereta, L. Lassaletta & Juan A. Tovar

Authors
  1. J. L. Encinas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. L. Luis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. F. Avila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L. Martinez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. L. Guereta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. L. Lassaletta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Juan A. Tovar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan A. Tovar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Encinas, J.L., Luis, A.L., Avila, L.F. et al. Impact of preoperative diagnosis of congenital heart disease on the treatment of esophageal atresia. Ped Surgery Int 22, 150–153 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-005-1595-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-005-1595-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation